Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
36
IVN.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$13.97
Seasonality move
:
0.76%
Day range:
$13.57 - $14.80
52-week range:
$8.76 - $20.34
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
52.07x
P/S ratio:
31.28x
P/B ratio:
2.46x
Volume:
7.4M
Avg. volume:
5.3M
1-year change:
10.17%
Market cap:
$19.9B
Revenue:
$617.1M
EPS (TTM):
$0.27
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IVN.TO
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
|
$251.6M | $0.05 | 125.94% | -13.84% | $19.08 |
|
AII.TO
Almonty Industries, Inc.
|
$14M | $0.00 | 338.6% | -54.1% | $20.46 |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FL.V
Frontier Lithium, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.01 | -- | -14.53% | $1.55 |
|
TECK.B.TO
Teck Resources Limited
|
$3.1B | $0.96 | 28.88% | 52.82% | $80.71 |
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.03 | -- | -13.88% | $9.08 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IVN.TO
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
|
$13.97 | $19.08 | $19.9B | 52.07x | $0.00 | 0% | 31.28x |
|
AII.TO
Almonty Industries, Inc.
|
$26.43 | $20.46 | $6.8B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 164.27x |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
$0.22 | -- | $20.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
FL.V
Frontier Lithium, Inc.
|
$0.91 | $1.55 | $209.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TECK.B.TO
Teck Resources Limited
|
$75.77 | $80.71 | $37.1B | 26.77x | $0.13 | 0.66% | 3.49x |
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
$5.53 | $9.08 | $954.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IVN.TO
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
|
17.66% | 0.362 | 7.9% | 2.04x |
|
AII.TO
Almonty Industries, Inc.
|
53.65% | 2.464 | 12.02% | 2.11x |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | 2.213 | -- | 2.04x |
|
FL.V
Frontier Lithium, Inc.
|
-100.89% | -1.631 | 3.42% | 0.36x |
|
TECK.B.TO
Teck Resources Limited
|
27.68% | 2.539 | 29.1% | 1.72x |
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
0.09% | -4.747 | 0.02% | 1.56x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IVN.TO
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
|
-$3.8M | $38.2M | 3.68% | 4.39% | 19.78% | -$222.1M |
|
AII.TO
Almonty Industries, Inc.
|
$1.3M | -$3.1M | -27.94% | -112.47% | -36.21% | -$27.1M |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | -$1.5M | -61.67% | -61.76% | -- | -$942.3K |
|
FL.V
Frontier Lithium, Inc.
|
-$201K | -$2.6M | -326.05% | -195.5% | -- | -$2.8M |
|
TECK.B.TO
Teck Resources Limited
|
$916M | $652M | 2.98% | 4.09% | 21.32% | $294M |
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -$4.7M | -32.63% | -32.66% | -- | -$840K |
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IVN.TO or AII.TO?
Almonty Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 28.83% compared to Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net margin of -809.36%. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.39% beat Almonty Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -112.47%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.-1.96% $0.05 $9.6B AII.TOAlmonty Industries, Inc.14.42% $0.13 $368.6M -
What do Analysts Say About IVN.TO or AII.TO?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of $19.08, signalling upside risk potential of 36.61%. On the other hand Almonty Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.46 which suggests that it could fall by -22.6%. Given that Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has higher upside potential than Almonty Industries, Inc., analysts believe Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. is more attractive than Almonty Industries, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.8 3 0 AII.TOAlmonty Industries, Inc.8 1 0 -
Is IVN.TO or AII.TO More Risky?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.663, which suggesting that the stock is 66.278% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Almonty Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.549, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.893%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVN.TO or AII.TO?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Almonty Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Almonty Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVN.TO or AII.TO?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are $193M, which are larger than Almonty Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.7M. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net income of $55.7M is higher than Almonty Industries, Inc.'s net income of $33.2M. Notably, Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.07x while Almonty Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. is 31.28x versus 164.27x for Almonty Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.31.28x 52.07x $193M $55.7M AII.TOAlmonty Industries, Inc.164.27x -- $8.7M $33.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns IVN.TO or BFG.CX?
Giant Mining Corp. has a net margin of 28.83% compared to Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net margin of --. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.39% beat Giant Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -61.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.-1.96% $0.05 $9.6B BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.-- -$0.02 $13.1M -
What do Analysts Say About IVN.TO or BFG.CX?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of $19.08, signalling upside risk potential of 36.61%. On the other hand Giant Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has higher upside potential than Giant Mining Corp., analysts believe Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. is more attractive than Giant Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.8 3 0 BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.0 0 0 -
Is IVN.TO or BFG.CX More Risky?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.663, which suggesting that the stock is 66.278% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Giant Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.260, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.965%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVN.TO or BFG.CX?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Giant Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Giant Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVN.TO or BFG.CX?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are $193M, which are larger than Giant Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net income of $55.7M is higher than Giant Mining Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.07x while Giant Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. is 31.28x versus -- for Giant Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.31.28x 52.07x $193M $55.7M BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.-- -- -- -$1.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns IVN.TO or FL.V?
Frontier Lithium, Inc. has a net margin of 28.83% compared to Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net margin of --. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.39% beat Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s return on equity of -195.5%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.-1.96% $0.05 $9.6B FL.VFrontier Lithium, Inc.-- -$0.01 -$4.9M -
What do Analysts Say About IVN.TO or FL.V?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of $19.08, signalling upside risk potential of 36.61%. On the other hand Frontier Lithium, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.55 which suggests that it could grow by 70.33%. Given that Frontier Lithium, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd., analysts believe Frontier Lithium, Inc. is more attractive than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.8 3 0 FL.VFrontier Lithium, Inc.1 1 0 -
Is IVN.TO or FL.V More Risky?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.663, which suggesting that the stock is 66.278% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Frontier Lithium, Inc. has a beta of 0.675, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.516%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVN.TO or FL.V?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Frontier Lithium, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Frontier Lithium, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVN.TO or FL.V?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are $193M, which are larger than Frontier Lithium, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net income of $55.7M is higher than Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.07x while Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. is 31.28x versus -- for Frontier Lithium, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.31.28x 52.07x $193M $55.7M FL.VFrontier Lithium, Inc.-- -- -- -$2.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns IVN.TO or TECK.B.TO?
Teck Resources Limited has a net margin of 28.83% compared to Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net margin of 17.17%. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.39% beat Teck Resources Limited's return on equity of 4.09%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.-1.96% $0.05 $9.6B TECK.B.TOTeck Resources Limited29.95% $1.11 $35.6B -
What do Analysts Say About IVN.TO or TECK.B.TO?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of $19.08, signalling upside risk potential of 36.61%. On the other hand Teck Resources Limited has an analysts' consensus of $80.71 which suggests that it could grow by 6.51%. Given that Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has higher upside potential than Teck Resources Limited, analysts believe Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. is more attractive than Teck Resources Limited.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.8 3 0 TECK.B.TOTeck Resources Limited6 10 2 -
Is IVN.TO or TECK.B.TO More Risky?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.663, which suggesting that the stock is 66.278% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Teck Resources Limited has a beta of 1.449, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.919%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVN.TO or TECK.B.TO?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Teck Resources Limited offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teck Resources Limited pays out 17.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Teck Resources Limited's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVN.TO or TECK.B.TO?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are $193M, which are smaller than Teck Resources Limited quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net income of $55.7M is lower than Teck Resources Limited's net income of $525M. Notably, Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.07x while Teck Resources Limited's PE ratio is 26.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. is 31.28x versus 3.49x for Teck Resources Limited. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.31.28x 52.07x $193M $55.7M TECK.B.TOTeck Resources Limited3.49x 26.77x $3.1B $525M
-
Which has Higher Returns IVN.TO or TMQ.TO?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a net margin of 28.83% compared to Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net margin of --. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.39% beat Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -32.66%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.-1.96% $0.05 $9.6B TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -$0.29 $173.2M -
What do Analysts Say About IVN.TO or TMQ.TO?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of $19.08, signalling upside risk potential of 36.61%. On the other hand Trilogy Metals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $9.08 which suggests that it could grow by 64.16%. Given that Trilogy Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd., analysts believe Trilogy Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.8 3 0 TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.3 3 0 -
Is IVN.TO or TMQ.TO More Risky?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.663, which suggesting that the stock is 66.278% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.544, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.417%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVN.TO or TMQ.TO?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trilogy Metals, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trilogy Metals, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVN.TO or TMQ.TO?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are $193M, which are larger than Trilogy Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net income of $55.7M is higher than Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$48.4M. Notably, Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.07x while Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. is 31.28x versus -- for Trilogy Metals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.31.28x 52.07x $193M $55.7M TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$48.4M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4
Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is down 1.76% over the past day.
Buy
54
KORU alert for Mar 4
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is down 3.76% over the past day.
Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 4
Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is down 1.33% over the past day.
