Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
63
IVN.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$16.05
Seasonality move
:
12.34%
Day range:
$16.42 - $16.86
52-week range:
$8.76 - $17.85
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
52.50x
P/S ratio:
47.27x
P/B ratio:
2.93x
Volume:
4M
Avg. volume:
3.5M
1-year change:
-6.03%
Market cap:
$23.7B
Revenue:
$55.9M
EPS (TTM):
$0.32
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IVN.TO
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
|
$264.4M | $0.04 | 363.21% | -21.35% | $18.01 |
|
AII.TO
Almonty Industries, Inc.
|
$16.2M | $0.01 | 157.8% | -32.04% | $10.45 |
|
FL.V
Frontier Lithium, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.01 | -- | -14.53% | $1.85 |
|
NDM.TO
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -100% | -- |
|
TECK.B.TO
Teck Resources Limited
|
$2.7B | $0.59 | -1.9% | -15.67% | $63.18 |
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.01 | -- | -34.95% | $8.27 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IVN.TO
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
|
$16.67 | $18.01 | $23.7B | 52.50x | $0.00 | 0% | 47.27x |
|
AII.TO
Almonty Industries, Inc.
|
$13.43 | $10.45 | $2.6B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 83.47x |
|
FL.V
Frontier Lithium, Inc.
|
$0.71 | $1.85 | $163.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
NDM.TO
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
|
$3.06 | -- | $1.7B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TECK.B.TO
Teck Resources Limited
|
$70.92 | $63.18 | $34.6B | 29.31x | $0.13 | 0.71% | 3.38x |
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
$7.01 | $8.27 | $1.2B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IVN.TO
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
|
16.75% | 1.868 | 7.84% | 3.60x |
|
AII.TO
Almonty Industries, Inc.
|
53.65% | -1.344 | 12.02% | 2.11x |
|
FL.V
Frontier Lithium, Inc.
|
-194.47% | -1.512 | 4.06% | 0.44x |
|
NDM.TO
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
|
51.28% | -4.784 | 6.82% | 0.67x |
|
TECK.B.TO
Teck Resources Limited
|
27.88% | 3.168 | 31.41% | 1.90x |
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
0.1% | -3.895 | 0.04% | 62.66x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IVN.TO
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
|
-$4.2M | -$24.5M | 4.78% | 5.52% | -13.72% | -$165.8M |
|
AII.TO
Almonty Industries, Inc.
|
$1.3M | -$3.1M | -27.94% | -112.47% | -36.21% | -$27.1M |
|
FL.V
Frontier Lithium, Inc.
|
-$206K | -$1.9M | -129.02% | -195.5% | -- | -$624K |
|
NDM.TO
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
|
-$43K | -$6.5M | -64.33% | -112.85% | -- | -$5.2M |
|
TECK.B.TO
Teck Resources Limited
|
$581M | $451M | 2.2% | 3.02% | 13.32% | $255M |
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -$1.6M | -7.07% | -7.08% | -- | -$1.7M |
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IVN.TO or AII.TO?
Almonty Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 23.61% compared to Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net margin of -809.36%. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.52% beat Almonty Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -112.47%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.-2.37% $0.03 $9.5B AII.TOAlmonty Industries, Inc.14.42% $0.13 $368.6M -
What do Analysts Say About IVN.TO or AII.TO?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of $18.01, signalling upside risk potential of 8.02%. On the other hand Almonty Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.45 which suggests that it could fall by -22.2%. Given that Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has higher upside potential than Almonty Industries, Inc., analysts believe Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. is more attractive than Almonty Industries, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.9 2 0 AII.TOAlmonty Industries, Inc.7 1 0 -
Is IVN.TO or AII.TO More Risky?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.957, which suggesting that the stock is 95.657% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Almonty Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.346, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.629%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVN.TO or AII.TO?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Almonty Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Almonty Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVN.TO or AII.TO?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are $178.2M, which are larger than Almonty Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.7M. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net income of $42.1M is higher than Almonty Industries, Inc.'s net income of $33.2M. Notably, Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.50x while Almonty Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. is 47.27x versus 83.47x for Almonty Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.47.27x 52.50x $178.2M $42.1M AII.TOAlmonty Industries, Inc.83.47x -- $8.7M $33.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns IVN.TO or FL.V?
Frontier Lithium, Inc. has a net margin of 23.61% compared to Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net margin of --. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.52% beat Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s return on equity of -195.5%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.-2.37% $0.03 $9.5B FL.VFrontier Lithium, Inc.-- -$0.01 -$2.2M -
What do Analysts Say About IVN.TO or FL.V?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of $18.01, signalling upside risk potential of 8.02%. On the other hand Frontier Lithium, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.85 which suggests that it could grow by 160.56%. Given that Frontier Lithium, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd., analysts believe Frontier Lithium, Inc. is more attractive than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.9 2 0 FL.VFrontier Lithium, Inc.1 1 0 -
Is IVN.TO or FL.V More Risky?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.957, which suggesting that the stock is 95.657% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Frontier Lithium, Inc. has a beta of 0.996, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.41%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVN.TO or FL.V?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Frontier Lithium, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Frontier Lithium, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVN.TO or FL.V?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are $178.2M, which are larger than Frontier Lithium, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net income of $42.1M is higher than Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.50x while Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. is 47.27x versus -- for Frontier Lithium, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.47.27x 52.50x $178.2M $42.1M FL.VFrontier Lithium, Inc.-- -- -- -$1.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns IVN.TO or NDM.TO?
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of 23.61% compared to Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net margin of --. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.52% beat Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -112.85%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.-2.37% $0.03 $9.5B NDM.TONorthern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.-- -$0.01 $124M -
What do Analysts Say About IVN.TO or NDM.TO?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of $18.01, signalling upside risk potential of 8.02%. On the other hand Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -72.53%. Given that Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has higher upside potential than Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. is more attractive than Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.9 2 0 NDM.TONorthern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.2 0 0 -
Is IVN.TO or NDM.TO More Risky?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.957, which suggesting that the stock is 95.657% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 0.154, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.561%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVN.TO or NDM.TO?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVN.TO or NDM.TO?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are $178.2M, which are larger than Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net income of $42.1M is higher than Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$7.9M. Notably, Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.50x while Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. is 47.27x versus -- for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.47.27x 52.50x $178.2M $42.1M NDM.TONorthern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- -$7.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns IVN.TO or TECK.B.TO?
Teck Resources Limited has a net margin of 23.61% compared to Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net margin of 3.93%. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.52% beat Teck Resources Limited's return on equity of 3.02%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.-2.37% $0.03 $9.5B TECK.B.TOTeck Resources Limited17.16% $0.57 $35.4B -
What do Analysts Say About IVN.TO or TECK.B.TO?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of $18.01, signalling upside risk potential of 8.02%. On the other hand Teck Resources Limited has an analysts' consensus of $63.18 which suggests that it could fall by -10.92%. Given that Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has higher upside potential than Teck Resources Limited, analysts believe Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. is more attractive than Teck Resources Limited.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.9 2 0 TECK.B.TOTeck Resources Limited6 8 2 -
Is IVN.TO or TECK.B.TO More Risky?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.957, which suggesting that the stock is 95.657% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Teck Resources Limited has a beta of 1.501, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.07%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVN.TO or TECK.B.TO?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Teck Resources Limited offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teck Resources Limited pays out 79.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Teck Resources Limited's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVN.TO or TECK.B.TO?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are $178.2M, which are smaller than Teck Resources Limited quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net income of $42.1M is lower than Teck Resources Limited's net income of $133M. Notably, Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.50x while Teck Resources Limited's PE ratio is 29.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. is 47.27x versus 3.38x for Teck Resources Limited. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.47.27x 52.50x $178.2M $42.1M TECK.B.TOTeck Resources Limited3.38x 29.31x $3.4B $133M
-
Which has Higher Returns IVN.TO or TMQ.TO?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a net margin of 23.61% compared to Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net margin of --. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.52% beat Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.08%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.-2.37% $0.03 $9.5B TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -$0.01 $176.8M -
What do Analysts Say About IVN.TO or TMQ.TO?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of $18.01, signalling upside risk potential of 8.02%. On the other hand Trilogy Metals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.27 which suggests that it could grow by 17.94%. Given that Trilogy Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd., analysts believe Trilogy Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.9 2 0 TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.1 4 0 -
Is IVN.TO or TMQ.TO More Risky?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.957, which suggesting that the stock is 95.657% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.720, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.048%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVN.TO or TMQ.TO?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trilogy Metals, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trilogy Metals, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVN.TO or TMQ.TO?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are $178.2M, which are larger than Trilogy Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net income of $42.1M is higher than Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.50x while Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. is 47.27x versus -- for Trilogy Metals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.47.27x 52.50x $178.2M $42.1M TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$2.4M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Buy
59
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
69
RGC alert for Jan 7
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 36.12% over the past day.
Buy
69
WDC alert for Jan 7
Western Digital Corp. [WDC] is down 9.52% over the past day.
Buy
75
DRUG alert for Jan 7
Bright Minds Biosciences, Inc. [DRUG] is down 3.68% over the past day.
