Financhill
Buy
56

IVN.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$18.06
Seasonality move :
8.27%
Day range:
$16.48 - $17.06
52-week range:
$8.76 - $20.34
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
52.93x
P/S ratio:
47.66x
P/B ratio:
2.96x
Volume:
4.6M
Avg. volume:
4.1M
1-year change:
4.35%
Market cap:
$23.9B
Revenue:
$55.9M
EPS (TTM):
$0.32

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
IVN.TO
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
$134.7M $0.03 176.86% -55.03% $10.17
AII.TO
Almonty Industries, Inc.
$16.5M $0.01 391.7% -32.04% $15.36
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
-- -- -- -- --
FL.V
Frontier Lithium, Inc.
-- -$0.01 -- -14.53% $1.55
TECK.B.TO
Teck Resources Limited
$3B $0.94 34.58% 14.6% $74.74
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
-- -$0.01 -- -65.49% $4.89
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
IVN.TO
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
$16.81 $10.17 $23.9B 52.93x $0.00 0% 47.66x
AII.TO
Almonty Industries, Inc.
$19.28 $15.36 $3.8B -- $0.00 0% 119.83x
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
$0.39 -- $37M -- $0.00 0% --
FL.V
Frontier Lithium, Inc.
$0.85 $1.55 $196M -- $0.00 0% --
TECK.B.TO
Teck Resources Limited
$75.15 $74.74 $36.7B 31.06x $0.13 0.67% 3.58x
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
$6.37 $4.89 $1.1B -- $0.00 0% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
IVN.TO
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
16.75% 1.846 7.84% 3.60x
AII.TO
Almonty Industries, Inc.
53.65% -1.753 12.02% 2.11x
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
-- 2.493 -- 7.80x
FL.V
Frontier Lithium, Inc.
-194.47% -2.511 4.06% 0.44x
TECK.B.TO
Teck Resources Limited
27.88% 2.847 31.41% 1.90x
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
0.1% -3.757 0.04% 62.66x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
IVN.TO
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
-$4.2M -$24.5M 4.78% 5.52% -13.72% -$165.8M
AII.TO
Almonty Industries, Inc.
$1.3M -$3.1M -27.94% -112.47% -36.21% -$27.1M
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
-- -$1.6M -57.76% -57.93% -- -$2.2M
FL.V
Frontier Lithium, Inc.
-$206K -$1.9M -129.02% -195.5% -- -$624K
TECK.B.TO
Teck Resources Limited
$581M $451M 2.2% 3.02% 13.32% $255M
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
-- -$1.6M -7.07% -7.08% -- -$1.7M

Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns IVN.TO or AII.TO?

    Almonty Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 23.61% compared to Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net margin of -809.36%. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.52% beat Almonty Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -112.47%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IVN.TO
    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
    -2.37% $0.03 $9.5B
    AII.TO
    Almonty Industries, Inc.
    14.42% $0.13 $368.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About IVN.TO or AII.TO?

    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of $10.17, signalling downside risk potential of -39.7%. On the other hand Almonty Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.36 which suggests that it could fall by -29.67%. Given that Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has more downside risk than Almonty Industries, Inc., analysts believe Almonty Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IVN.TO
    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
    9 2 0
    AII.TO
    Almonty Industries, Inc.
    7 0 0
  • Is IVN.TO or AII.TO More Risky?

    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.909, which suggesting that the stock is 90.927% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Almonty Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.332, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.233%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVN.TO or AII.TO?

    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Almonty Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Almonty Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IVN.TO or AII.TO?

    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are $178.2M, which are larger than Almonty Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.7M. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net income of $42.1M is higher than Almonty Industries, Inc.'s net income of $33.2M. Notably, Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.93x while Almonty Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. is 47.66x versus 119.83x for Almonty Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IVN.TO
    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
    47.66x 52.93x $178.2M $42.1M
    AII.TO
    Almonty Industries, Inc.
    119.83x -- $8.7M $33.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns IVN.TO or BFG.CX?

    Giant Mining Corp. has a net margin of 23.61% compared to Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net margin of --. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.52% beat Giant Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -57.93%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IVN.TO
    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
    -2.37% $0.03 $9.5B
    BFG.CX
    Giant Mining Corp.
    -- -$0.02 $14.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About IVN.TO or BFG.CX?

    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of $10.17, signalling downside risk potential of -39.7%. On the other hand Giant Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has higher upside potential than Giant Mining Corp., analysts believe Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. is more attractive than Giant Mining Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IVN.TO
    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
    9 2 0
    BFG.CX
    Giant Mining Corp.
    0 0 0
  • Is IVN.TO or BFG.CX More Risky?

    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.909, which suggesting that the stock is 90.927% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Giant Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.519, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.139%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVN.TO or BFG.CX?

    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Giant Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Giant Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IVN.TO or BFG.CX?

    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are $178.2M, which are larger than Giant Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net income of $42.1M is higher than Giant Mining Corp.'s net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.93x while Giant Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. is 47.66x versus -- for Giant Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IVN.TO
    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
    47.66x 52.93x $178.2M $42.1M
    BFG.CX
    Giant Mining Corp.
    -- -- -- -$1.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns IVN.TO or FL.V?

    Frontier Lithium, Inc. has a net margin of 23.61% compared to Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net margin of --. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.52% beat Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s return on equity of -195.5%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IVN.TO
    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
    -2.37% $0.03 $9.5B
    FL.V
    Frontier Lithium, Inc.
    -- -$0.01 -$2.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About IVN.TO or FL.V?

    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of $10.17, signalling downside risk potential of -39.7%. On the other hand Frontier Lithium, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.55 which suggests that it could grow by 82.35%. Given that Frontier Lithium, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd., analysts believe Frontier Lithium, Inc. is more attractive than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IVN.TO
    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
    9 2 0
    FL.V
    Frontier Lithium, Inc.
    1 1 0
  • Is IVN.TO or FL.V More Risky?

    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.909, which suggesting that the stock is 90.927% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Frontier Lithium, Inc. has a beta of 1.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.045%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVN.TO or FL.V?

    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Frontier Lithium, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Frontier Lithium, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IVN.TO or FL.V?

    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are $178.2M, which are larger than Frontier Lithium, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net income of $42.1M is higher than Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.93x while Frontier Lithium, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. is 47.66x versus -- for Frontier Lithium, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IVN.TO
    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
    47.66x 52.93x $178.2M $42.1M
    FL.V
    Frontier Lithium, Inc.
    -- -- -- -$1.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns IVN.TO or TECK.B.TO?

    Teck Resources Limited has a net margin of 23.61% compared to Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net margin of 3.93%. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.52% beat Teck Resources Limited's return on equity of 3.02%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IVN.TO
    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
    -2.37% $0.03 $9.5B
    TECK.B.TO
    Teck Resources Limited
    17.16% $0.57 $35.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About IVN.TO or TECK.B.TO?

    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of $10.17, signalling downside risk potential of -39.7%. On the other hand Teck Resources Limited has an analysts' consensus of $74.74 which suggests that it could fall by -1.1%. Given that Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has more downside risk than Teck Resources Limited, analysts believe Teck Resources Limited is more attractive than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IVN.TO
    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
    9 2 0
    TECK.B.TO
    Teck Resources Limited
    7 9 1
  • Is IVN.TO or TECK.B.TO More Risky?

    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.909, which suggesting that the stock is 90.927% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Teck Resources Limited has a beta of 1.481, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.149%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVN.TO or TECK.B.TO?

    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Teck Resources Limited offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teck Resources Limited pays out 79.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Teck Resources Limited's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IVN.TO or TECK.B.TO?

    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are $178.2M, which are smaller than Teck Resources Limited quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net income of $42.1M is lower than Teck Resources Limited's net income of $133M. Notably, Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.93x while Teck Resources Limited's PE ratio is 31.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. is 47.66x versus 3.58x for Teck Resources Limited. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IVN.TO
    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
    47.66x 52.93x $178.2M $42.1M
    TECK.B.TO
    Teck Resources Limited
    3.58x 31.06x $3.4B $133M
  • Which has Higher Returns IVN.TO or TMQ.TO?

    Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a net margin of 23.61% compared to Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net margin of --. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.52% beat Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.08%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IVN.TO
    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
    -2.37% $0.03 $9.5B
    TMQ.TO
    Trilogy Metals, Inc.
    -- -$0.01 $176.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About IVN.TO or TMQ.TO?

    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of $10.17, signalling downside risk potential of -39.7%. On the other hand Trilogy Metals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.89 which suggests that it could grow by 38.82%. Given that Trilogy Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd., analysts believe Trilogy Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IVN.TO
    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
    9 2 0
    TMQ.TO
    Trilogy Metals, Inc.
    1 4 0
  • Is IVN.TO or TMQ.TO More Risky?

    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.909, which suggesting that the stock is 90.927% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.700, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.975%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVN.TO or TMQ.TO?

    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trilogy Metals, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trilogy Metals, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IVN.TO or TMQ.TO?

    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are $178.2M, which are larger than Trilogy Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net income of $42.1M is higher than Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 52.93x while Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. is 47.66x versus -- for Trilogy Metals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IVN.TO
    Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
    47.66x 52.93x $178.2M $42.1M
    TMQ.TO
    Trilogy Metals, Inc.
    -- -- -- -$2.4M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?

Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…

Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?

Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…

Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?

Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…

Stock Ideas

Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x

Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
53
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 30x

Alerts

Sell
40
BILL alert for Feb 9

Bill Holdings, Inc. [BILL] is up 3.7% over the past day.

Buy
75
PRLB alert for Feb 9

Proto Labs, Inc. [PRLB] is down 2.16% over the past day.

Sell
30
MSTR alert for Feb 9

Strategy, Inc. [MSTR] is up 2.59% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock