LAC.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Lithium Americas Corp.'s net margin of --. Lithium Americas Corp.'s return on equity of -32.83% beat Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -112.85%.

Lithium Americas Corp. has a consensus price target of $6.94, signalling downside risk potential of -9.34%. On the other hand Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -72.53%. Given that Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has more downside risk than Lithium Americas Corp., analysts believe Lithium Americas Corp. is more attractive than Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd..

Lithium Americas Corp. has a beta of 1.215, which suggesting that the stock is 21.54% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 0.154, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.561%.

Lithium Americas Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lithium Americas Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lithium Americas Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Lithium Americas Corp.'s net income of -$274.3M is lower than Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$7.9M. Notably, Lithium Americas Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium Americas Corp. is -- versus -- for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Standard Lithium Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Lithium Americas Corp.'s net margin of --. Lithium Americas Corp.'s return on equity of -32.83% beat Standard Lithium Ltd.'s return on equity of -7.12%.

Lithium Americas Corp. has a consensus price target of $6.94, signalling downside risk potential of -9.34%. On the other hand Standard Lithium Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $6.33 which suggests that it could fall by -12.16%. Given that Standard Lithium Ltd. has more downside risk than Lithium Americas Corp., analysts believe Lithium Americas Corp. is more attractive than Standard Lithium Ltd..

Lithium Americas Corp. has a beta of 1.215, which suggesting that the stock is 21.54% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Standard Lithium Ltd. has a beta of 1.791, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.1%.

Lithium Americas Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Standard Lithium Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lithium Americas Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Standard Lithium Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lithium Americas Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Standard Lithium Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Lithium Americas Corp.'s net income of -$274.3M is lower than Standard Lithium Ltd.'s net income of -$8.4M. Notably, Lithium Americas Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Standard Lithium Ltd.'s PE ratio is 5.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium Americas Corp. is -- versus 7,872.23x for Standard Lithium Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Teck Resources Limited has a net margin of -- compared to Lithium Americas Corp.'s net margin of 3.93%. Lithium Americas Corp.'s return on equity of -32.83% beat Teck Resources Limited's return on equity of 3.02%.

Lithium Americas Corp. has a consensus price target of $6.94, signalling downside risk potential of -9.34%. On the other hand Teck Resources Limited has an analysts' consensus of $63.18 which suggests that it could fall by -7.72%. Given that Lithium Americas Corp. has more downside risk than Teck Resources Limited, analysts believe Teck Resources Limited is more attractive than Lithium Americas Corp..

Lithium Americas Corp. has a beta of 1.215, which suggesting that the stock is 21.54% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Teck Resources Limited has a beta of 1.501, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.07%.

Lithium Americas Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Teck Resources Limited offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Lithium Americas Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teck Resources Limited pays out 79.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Teck Resources Limited's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lithium Americas Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Teck Resources Limited quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Lithium Americas Corp.'s net income of -$274.3M is lower than Teck Resources Limited's net income of $133M. Notably, Lithium Americas Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Teck Resources Limited's PE ratio is 28.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium Americas Corp. is -- versus 3.26x for Teck Resources Limited. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Lithium Americas Corp.'s net margin of --. Lithium Americas Corp.'s return on equity of -32.83% beat Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.08%.

Lithium Americas Corp. has a consensus price target of $6.94, signalling downside risk potential of -9.34%. On the other hand Trilogy Metals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.27 which suggests that it could grow by 16.78%. Given that Trilogy Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lithium Americas Corp., analysts believe Trilogy Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Lithium Americas Corp..

Lithium Americas Corp. has a beta of 1.215, which suggesting that the stock is 21.54% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.720, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.048%.

Lithium Americas Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trilogy Metals, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lithium Americas Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trilogy Metals, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lithium Americas Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Trilogy Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Lithium Americas Corp.'s net income of -$274.3M is lower than Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Lithium Americas Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium Americas Corp. is -- versus -- for Trilogy Metals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.