Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
37
LAC.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$6.54
Seasonality move
:
-3.34%
Day range:
$6.29 - $6.69
52-week range:
$3.30 - $14.75
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
2.98x
Volume:
1.6M
Avg. volume:
1.7M
1-year change:
79.06%
Market cap:
$2B
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$1.36
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LAC.TO
Lithium Americas Corp.
|
-- | -$0.08 | -- | -43.58% | $7.41 |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GGO.V
Galleon Gold Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $2.75 |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.03 | -- | -13.88% | $9.08 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LAC.TO
Lithium Americas Corp.
|
$6.50 | $7.41 | $2B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
$0.22 | -- | $20.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GGO.V
Galleon Gold Corp.
|
$1.08 | $2.75 | $137M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
$0.0250 | -- | $9.6M | 32.41x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
$5.53 | $9.08 | $954.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LAC.TO
Lithium Americas Corp.
|
46.01% | 3.417 | 22.44% | 3.74x |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | 2.213 | -- | 2.04x |
|
GGO.V
Galleon Gold Corp.
|
36.64% | 0.392 | 38.5% | 3.05x |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -3.404 | -- | 0.06x |
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
0.09% | -4.747 | 0.02% | 1.56x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LAC.TO
Lithium Americas Corp.
|
-$369.1K | -$13.4M | -30.14% | -32.83% | -- | -$231.3M |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | -$1.5M | -61.67% | -61.76% | -- | -$942.3K |
|
GGO.V
Galleon Gold Corp.
|
-$5.4K | -$432.2K | -3.04% | -3.89% | -- | -$1.2M |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$108.9K | -- | -- | -- | -$46K |
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -$4.7M | -32.63% | -32.66% | -- | -$840K |
Lithium Americas Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LAC.TO or BFG.CX?
Giant Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Lithium Americas Corp.'s net margin of --. Lithium Americas Corp.'s return on equity of -32.83% beat Giant Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -61.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LAC.TOLithium Americas Corp.-- -$1.14 $1.8B BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.-- -$0.02 $13.1M -
What do Analysts Say About LAC.TO or BFG.CX?
Lithium Americas Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.41, signalling upside risk potential of 13.99%. On the other hand Giant Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lithium Americas Corp. has higher upside potential than Giant Mining Corp., analysts believe Lithium Americas Corp. is more attractive than Giant Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LAC.TOLithium Americas Corp.2 9 0 BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.0 0 0 -
Is LAC.TO or BFG.CX More Risky?
Lithium Americas Corp. has a beta of 1.215, which suggesting that the stock is 21.54% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Giant Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.260, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.965%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LAC.TO or BFG.CX?
Lithium Americas Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Giant Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lithium Americas Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Giant Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LAC.TO or BFG.CX?
Lithium Americas Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Giant Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Lithium Americas Corp.'s net income of -$274.3M is lower than Giant Mining Corp.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Lithium Americas Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Giant Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium Americas Corp. is -- versus -- for Giant Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LAC.TOLithium Americas Corp.-- -- -- -$274.3M BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.-- -- -- -$1.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns LAC.TO or GGO.V?
Galleon Gold Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Lithium Americas Corp.'s net margin of --. Lithium Americas Corp.'s return on equity of -32.83% beat Galleon Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -3.89%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LAC.TOLithium Americas Corp.-- -$1.14 $1.8B GGO.VGalleon Gold Corp.-- -$0.01 $42.3M -
What do Analysts Say About LAC.TO or GGO.V?
Lithium Americas Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.41, signalling upside risk potential of 13.99%. On the other hand Galleon Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $2.75 which suggests that it could grow by 154.63%. Given that Galleon Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Lithium Americas Corp., analysts believe Galleon Gold Corp. is more attractive than Lithium Americas Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LAC.TOLithium Americas Corp.2 9 0 GGO.VGalleon Gold Corp.1 0 0 -
Is LAC.TO or GGO.V More Risky?
Lithium Americas Corp. has a beta of 1.215, which suggesting that the stock is 21.54% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Galleon Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.896, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.591%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LAC.TO or GGO.V?
Lithium Americas Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Galleon Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lithium Americas Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Galleon Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LAC.TO or GGO.V?
Lithium Americas Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Galleon Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Lithium Americas Corp.'s net income of -$274.3M is lower than Galleon Gold Corp.'s net income of -$800.8K. Notably, Lithium Americas Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Galleon Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium Americas Corp. is -- versus -- for Galleon Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LAC.TOLithium Americas Corp.-- -- -- -$274.3M GGO.VGalleon Gold Corp.-- -- -- -$800.8K
-
Which has Higher Returns LAC.TO or RFR.CX?
Renforth Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Lithium Americas Corp.'s net margin of --. Lithium Americas Corp.'s return on equity of -32.83% beat Renforth Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LAC.TOLithium Americas Corp.-- -$1.14 $1.8B RFR.CXRenforth Resources, Inc.-- -$0.00 -$680.2K -
What do Analysts Say About LAC.TO or RFR.CX?
Lithium Americas Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.41, signalling upside risk potential of 13.99%. On the other hand Renforth Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 380%. Given that Renforth Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lithium Americas Corp., analysts believe Renforth Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Lithium Americas Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LAC.TOLithium Americas Corp.2 9 0 RFR.CXRenforth Resources, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is LAC.TO or RFR.CX More Risky?
Lithium Americas Corp. has a beta of 1.215, which suggesting that the stock is 21.54% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Renforth Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.955%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LAC.TO or RFR.CX?
Lithium Americas Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Renforth Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lithium Americas Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Renforth Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LAC.TO or RFR.CX?
Lithium Americas Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Renforth Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Lithium Americas Corp.'s net income of -$274.3M is lower than Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$108.9K. Notably, Lithium Americas Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Renforth Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium Americas Corp. is -- versus -- for Renforth Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LAC.TOLithium Americas Corp.-- -- -- -$274.3M RFR.CXRenforth Resources, Inc.-- 32.41x -- -$108.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns LAC.TO or TMQ.TO?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Lithium Americas Corp.'s net margin of --. Lithium Americas Corp.'s return on equity of -32.83% beat Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -32.66%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LAC.TOLithium Americas Corp.-- -$1.14 $1.8B TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -$0.29 $173.2M -
What do Analysts Say About LAC.TO or TMQ.TO?
Lithium Americas Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.41, signalling upside risk potential of 13.99%. On the other hand Trilogy Metals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $9.08 which suggests that it could grow by 64.16%. Given that Trilogy Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lithium Americas Corp., analysts believe Trilogy Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Lithium Americas Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LAC.TOLithium Americas Corp.2 9 0 TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.3 3 0 -
Is LAC.TO or TMQ.TO More Risky?
Lithium Americas Corp. has a beta of 1.215, which suggesting that the stock is 21.54% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.544, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.417%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LAC.TO or TMQ.TO?
Lithium Americas Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trilogy Metals, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lithium Americas Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trilogy Metals, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LAC.TO or TMQ.TO?
Lithium Americas Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Trilogy Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Lithium Americas Corp.'s net income of -$274.3M is lower than Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$48.4M. Notably, Lithium Americas Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium Americas Corp. is -- versus -- for Trilogy Metals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LAC.TOLithium Americas Corp.-- -- -- -$274.3M TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$48.4M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4
Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is up 2.31% over the past day.
Buy
54
KORU alert for Mar 4
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is up 9.84% over the past day.
Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 4
Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is up 0.76% over the past day.
