LAC.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

37 Capital has a net margin of -- compared to Lithium Americas's net margin of --. Lithium Americas's return on equity of -- beat 37 Capital's return on equity of --.

Lithium Americas has a consensus price target of $10.18, signalling upside risk potential of 130.94%. On the other hand 37 Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lithium Americas has higher upside potential than 37 Capital, analysts believe Lithium Americas is more attractive than 37 Capital.

Lithium Americas has a beta of 1.545, which suggesting that the stock is 54.509% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 37 Capital has a beta of 0.950, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.97%.

Lithium Americas has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 37 Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lithium Americas pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 37 Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lithium Americas quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than 37 Capital quarterly revenues of --. Lithium Americas's net income of -$11M is lower than 37 Capital's net income of -$33.8K. Notably, Lithium Americas's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 37 Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium Americas is -- versus -- for 37 Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Renforth Resources has a net margin of -- compared to Lithium Americas's net margin of --. Lithium Americas's return on equity of -- beat Renforth Resources's return on equity of --.

Lithium Americas has a consensus price target of $10.18, signalling upside risk potential of 130.94%. On the other hand Renforth Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 700%. Given that Renforth Resources has higher upside potential than Lithium Americas, analysts believe Renforth Resources is more attractive than Lithium Americas.

Lithium Americas has a beta of 1.545, which suggesting that the stock is 54.509% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Renforth Resources has a beta of 0.847, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.307%.

Lithium Americas has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Renforth Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lithium Americas pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Renforth Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lithium Americas quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Renforth Resources quarterly revenues of --. Lithium Americas's net income of -$11M is lower than Renforth Resources's net income of -$232.3K. Notably, Lithium Americas's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Renforth Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium Americas is -- versus -- for Renforth Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

St-Georges Eco-Mining has a net margin of -- compared to Lithium Americas's net margin of --. Lithium Americas's return on equity of -- beat St-Georges Eco-Mining's return on equity of --.

Lithium Americas has a consensus price target of $10.18, signalling upside risk potential of 130.94%. On the other hand St-Georges Eco-Mining has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lithium Americas has higher upside potential than St-Georges Eco-Mining, analysts believe Lithium Americas is more attractive than St-Georges Eco-Mining.

Lithium Americas has a beta of 1.545, which suggesting that the stock is 54.509% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison St-Georges Eco-Mining has a beta of 1.507, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.723%.

Lithium Americas has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. St-Georges Eco-Mining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lithium Americas pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. St-Georges Eco-Mining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lithium Americas quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than St-Georges Eco-Mining quarterly revenues of --. Lithium Americas's net income of -$11M is lower than St-Georges Eco-Mining's net income of -$740.8K. Notably, Lithium Americas's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while St-Georges Eco-Mining's PE ratio is 1.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium Americas is -- versus 3,224.35x for St-Georges Eco-Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Winston Gold has a net margin of -- compared to Lithium Americas's net margin of --. Lithium Americas's return on equity of -- beat Winston Gold's return on equity of --.

Lithium Americas has a consensus price target of $10.18, signalling upside risk potential of 130.94%. On the other hand Winston Gold has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lithium Americas has higher upside potential than Winston Gold, analysts believe Lithium Americas is more attractive than Winston Gold.

Lithium Americas has a beta of 1.545, which suggesting that the stock is 54.509% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Winston Gold has a beta of 0.852, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.819%.

Lithium Americas has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Winston Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lithium Americas pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Winston Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lithium Americas quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Winston Gold quarterly revenues of --. Lithium Americas's net income of -$11M is higher than Winston Gold's net income of --. Notably, Lithium Americas's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Winston Gold's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lithium Americas is -- versus -- for Winston Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.