Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Buy
55
SLI.V Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$6.43
Seasonality move
:
15.63%
Day range:
$6.48 - $6.99
52-week range:
$1.54 - $8.99
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
5.58x
P/S ratio:
7,872.23x
P/B ratio:
4.49x
Volume:
698K
Avg. volume:
405.2K
1-year change:
207.41%
Market cap:
$1.6B
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.12
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SLI.V
Standard Lithium Ltd.
|
-- | -$0.04 | -- | -141.38% | $6.33 |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LAC.TO
Lithium Americas Corp.
|
-- | -$0.07 | -- | -43.58% | $7.71 |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SX.CX
St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.01 | -- | -0.31% | $7.94 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SLI.V
Standard Lithium Ltd.
|
$6.64 | $6.33 | $1.6B | 5.58x | $0.00 | 0% | 7,872.23x |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
$0.24 | -- | $22.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
LAC.TO
Lithium Americas Corp.
|
$6.66 | $7.71 | $2B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
$0.0150 | -- | $5.8M | 32.41x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SX.CX
St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.
|
$0.0500 | -- | $15.6M | 15.05x | $0.00 | 0% | 5,524.25x |
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
$6.14 | $7.94 | $1.1B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SLI.V
Standard Lithium Ltd.
|
0.17% | 3.548 | 0.06% | 3.63x |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | 1.127 | -- | 7.80x |
|
LAC.TO
Lithium Americas Corp.
|
46.01% | 5.077 | 22.44% | 3.74x |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
-- | 1.769 | -- | 0.06x |
|
SX.CX
St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.
|
7.2% | -0.184 | 10.21% | 0.25x |
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
0.1% | -2.042 | 0.04% | 62.66x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SLI.V
Standard Lithium Ltd.
|
-$225.9K | -$9M | -7.11% | -7.12% | -- | -$4M |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | -$1.6M | -57.76% | -57.93% | -- | -$2.2M |
|
LAC.TO
Lithium Americas Corp.
|
-$369.1K | -$13.4M | -30.14% | -32.83% | -- | -$231.3M |
|
RFR.CX
Renforth Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$108.9K | -- | -- | -- | -$46K |
|
SX.CX
St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.
|
-$113.5K | -$490.8K | -9.58% | -10.32% | -- | -$70.6K |
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -$1.6M | -7.07% | -7.08% | -- | -$1.7M |
Standard Lithium Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SLI.V or BFG.CX?
Giant Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Standard Lithium Ltd.'s net margin of --. Standard Lithium Ltd.'s return on equity of -7.12% beat Giant Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -57.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SLI.VStandard Lithium Ltd.-- -$0.04 $352.8M BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.-- -$0.02 $14.6M -
What do Analysts Say About SLI.V or BFG.CX?
Standard Lithium Ltd. has a consensus price target of $6.33, signalling downside risk potential of -4.62%. On the other hand Giant Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Standard Lithium Ltd. has higher upside potential than Giant Mining Corp., analysts believe Standard Lithium Ltd. is more attractive than Giant Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SLI.VStandard Lithium Ltd.3 0 0 BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.0 0 0 -
Is SLI.V or BFG.CX More Risky?
Standard Lithium Ltd. has a beta of 1.791, which suggesting that the stock is 79.142% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Giant Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.535, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.477%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SLI.V or BFG.CX?
Standard Lithium Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Giant Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Standard Lithium Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Giant Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SLI.V or BFG.CX?
Standard Lithium Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Giant Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Standard Lithium Ltd.'s net income of -$8.4M is lower than Giant Mining Corp.'s net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Standard Lithium Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.58x while Giant Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Standard Lithium Ltd. is 7,872.23x versus -- for Giant Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SLI.VStandard Lithium Ltd.7,872.23x 5.58x -- -$8.4M BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.-- -- -- -$1.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns SLI.V or LAC.TO?
Lithium Americas Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Standard Lithium Ltd.'s net margin of --. Standard Lithium Ltd.'s return on equity of -7.12% beat Lithium Americas Corp.'s return on equity of -32.83%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SLI.VStandard Lithium Ltd.-- -$0.04 $352.8M LAC.TOLithium Americas Corp.-- -$1.14 $1.8B -
What do Analysts Say About SLI.V or LAC.TO?
Standard Lithium Ltd. has a consensus price target of $6.33, signalling downside risk potential of -4.62%. On the other hand Lithium Americas Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $7.71 which suggests that it could grow by 15.79%. Given that Lithium Americas Corp. has higher upside potential than Standard Lithium Ltd., analysts believe Lithium Americas Corp. is more attractive than Standard Lithium Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SLI.VStandard Lithium Ltd.3 0 0 LAC.TOLithium Americas Corp.2 9 0 -
Is SLI.V or LAC.TO More Risky?
Standard Lithium Ltd. has a beta of 1.791, which suggesting that the stock is 79.142% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lithium Americas Corp. has a beta of 1.215, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.54%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SLI.V or LAC.TO?
Standard Lithium Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lithium Americas Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Standard Lithium Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lithium Americas Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SLI.V or LAC.TO?
Standard Lithium Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lithium Americas Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Standard Lithium Ltd.'s net income of -$8.4M is higher than Lithium Americas Corp.'s net income of -$274.3M. Notably, Standard Lithium Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.58x while Lithium Americas Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Standard Lithium Ltd. is 7,872.23x versus -- for Lithium Americas Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SLI.VStandard Lithium Ltd.7,872.23x 5.58x -- -$8.4M LAC.TOLithium Americas Corp.-- -- -- -$274.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns SLI.V or RFR.CX?
Renforth Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Standard Lithium Ltd.'s net margin of --. Standard Lithium Ltd.'s return on equity of -7.12% beat Renforth Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SLI.VStandard Lithium Ltd.-- -$0.04 $352.8M RFR.CXRenforth Resources, Inc.-- -$0.00 -$680.2K -
What do Analysts Say About SLI.V or RFR.CX?
Standard Lithium Ltd. has a consensus price target of $6.33, signalling downside risk potential of -4.62%. On the other hand Renforth Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 700%. Given that Renforth Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Standard Lithium Ltd., analysts believe Renforth Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Standard Lithium Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SLI.VStandard Lithium Ltd.3 0 0 RFR.CXRenforth Resources, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SLI.V or RFR.CX More Risky?
Standard Lithium Ltd. has a beta of 1.791, which suggesting that the stock is 79.142% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Renforth Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.706, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.447%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SLI.V or RFR.CX?
Standard Lithium Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Renforth Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Standard Lithium Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Renforth Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SLI.V or RFR.CX?
Standard Lithium Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Renforth Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Standard Lithium Ltd.'s net income of -$8.4M is lower than Renforth Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$108.9K. Notably, Standard Lithium Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.58x while Renforth Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Standard Lithium Ltd. is 7,872.23x versus -- for Renforth Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SLI.VStandard Lithium Ltd.7,872.23x 5.58x -- -$8.4M RFR.CXRenforth Resources, Inc.-- 32.41x -- -$108.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns SLI.V or SX.CX?
St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Standard Lithium Ltd.'s net margin of --. Standard Lithium Ltd.'s return on equity of -7.12% beat St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -10.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SLI.VStandard Lithium Ltd.-- -$0.04 $352.8M SX.CXSt-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.-- -$0.00 $24.4M -
What do Analysts Say About SLI.V or SX.CX?
Standard Lithium Ltd. has a consensus price target of $6.33, signalling downside risk potential of -4.62%. On the other hand St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Standard Lithium Ltd. has higher upside potential than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp., analysts believe Standard Lithium Ltd. is more attractive than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SLI.VStandard Lithium Ltd.3 0 0 SX.CXSt-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.0 0 0 -
Is SLI.V or SX.CX More Risky?
Standard Lithium Ltd. has a beta of 1.791, which suggesting that the stock is 79.142% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.582, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.792%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SLI.V or SX.CX?
Standard Lithium Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Standard Lithium Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SLI.V or SX.CX?
Standard Lithium Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Standard Lithium Ltd.'s net income of -$8.4M is lower than St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.'s net income of -$814K. Notably, Standard Lithium Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.58x while St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Standard Lithium Ltd. is 7,872.23x versus 5,524.25x for St-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SLI.VStandard Lithium Ltd.7,872.23x 5.58x -- -$8.4M SX.CXSt-Georges Eco-Mining Corp.5,524.25x 15.05x -- -$814K
-
Which has Higher Returns SLI.V or TMQ.TO?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Standard Lithium Ltd.'s net margin of --. Standard Lithium Ltd.'s return on equity of -7.12% beat Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.08%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SLI.VStandard Lithium Ltd.-- -$0.04 $352.8M TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -$0.01 $176.8M -
What do Analysts Say About SLI.V or TMQ.TO?
Standard Lithium Ltd. has a consensus price target of $6.33, signalling downside risk potential of -4.62%. On the other hand Trilogy Metals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.94 which suggests that it could grow by 29.32%. Given that Trilogy Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Standard Lithium Ltd., analysts believe Trilogy Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Standard Lithium Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SLI.VStandard Lithium Ltd.3 0 0 TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.1 5 0 -
Is SLI.V or TMQ.TO More Risky?
Standard Lithium Ltd. has a beta of 1.791, which suggesting that the stock is 79.142% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.720, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.002%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SLI.V or TMQ.TO?
Standard Lithium Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trilogy Metals, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Standard Lithium Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trilogy Metals, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SLI.V or TMQ.TO?
Standard Lithium Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Trilogy Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Standard Lithium Ltd.'s net income of -$8.4M is lower than Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Standard Lithium Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.58x while Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Standard Lithium Ltd. is 7,872.23x versus -- for Trilogy Metals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SLI.VStandard Lithium Ltd.7,872.23x 5.58x -- -$8.4M TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$2.4M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
71
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 16
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 18.2% over the past day.
Sell
33
ZBIO alert for Dec 16
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is up 13.35% over the past day.
Sell
38
HUT alert for Dec 16
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 3.92% over the past day.
