Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Buy
57
NDM.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$2.83
Seasonality move
:
16.69%
Day range:
$2.82 - $3.06
52-week range:
$0.65 - $4.19
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
25.80x
Volume:
860.3K
Avg. volume:
853.8K
1-year change:
291.67%
Market cap:
$1.6B
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.15
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NDM.TO
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -$0.01 | -- | -100% | -- |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IVN.TO
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
|
$178.6M | $0.01 | 364.6% | -58.79% | $17.95 |
|
LAC.TO
Lithium Americas Corp.
|
-- | -$0.07 | -- | -43.58% | $7.71 |
|
TECK.B.TO
Teck Resources Limited
|
$3B | $0.57 | -1.9% | -21.87% | $62.94 |
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.01 | -- | -0.31% | $7.94 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NDM.TO
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
|
$2.82 | -- | $1.6B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
$0.24 | -- | $22.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
IVN.TO
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
|
$13.71 | $17.95 | $19.5B | 43.18x | $0.00 | 0% | 38.88x |
|
LAC.TO
Lithium Americas Corp.
|
$6.66 | $7.71 | $2B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TECK.B.TO
Teck Resources Limited
|
$59.30 | $62.94 | $29B | 24.51x | $0.13 | 0.84% | 2.83x |
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
$6.14 | $7.94 | $1.1B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NDM.TO
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
|
51.28% | -4.310 | 6.82% | 0.67x |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | 1.127 | -- | 7.80x |
|
IVN.TO
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
|
16.75% | 1.857 | 7.84% | 3.60x |
|
LAC.TO
Lithium Americas Corp.
|
46.01% | 5.077 | 22.44% | 3.74x |
|
TECK.B.TO
Teck Resources Limited
|
27.88% | 2.937 | 31.41% | 1.90x |
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
0.1% | -2.042 | 0.04% | 62.66x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NDM.TO
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
|
-$43K | -$6.5M | -64.33% | -112.85% | -- | -$5.2M |
|
BFG.CX
Giant Mining Corp.
|
-- | -$1.6M | -57.76% | -57.93% | -- | -$2.2M |
|
IVN.TO
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.
|
-$4.2M | -$24.5M | 4.78% | 5.52% | -13.72% | -$165.8M |
|
LAC.TO
Lithium Americas Corp.
|
-$369.1K | -$13.4M | -30.14% | -32.83% | -- | -$231.3M |
|
TECK.B.TO
Teck Resources Limited
|
$581M | $451M | 2.2% | 3.02% | 13.32% | $255M |
|
TMQ.TO
Trilogy Metals, Inc.
|
-- | -$1.6M | -7.07% | -7.08% | -- | -$1.7M |
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NDM.TO or BFG.CX?
Giant Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of --. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -112.85% beat Giant Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -57.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NDM.TONorthern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.-- -$0.01 $124M BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.-- -$0.02 $14.6M -
What do Analysts Say About NDM.TO or BFG.CX?
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -72.53%. On the other hand Giant Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Giant Mining Corp., analysts believe Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Giant Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NDM.TONorthern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.2 0 0 BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.0 0 0 -
Is NDM.TO or BFG.CX More Risky?
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 0.151, which suggesting that the stock is 84.853% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Giant Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.535, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.477%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NDM.TO or BFG.CX?
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Giant Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Giant Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NDM.TO or BFG.CX?
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Giant Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$7.9M is lower than Giant Mining Corp.'s net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Giant Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. is -- versus -- for Giant Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NDM.TONorthern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- -$7.9M BFG.CXGiant Mining Corp.-- -- -- -$1.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns NDM.TO or IVN.TO?
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of 23.61%. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -112.85% beat Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.52%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NDM.TONorthern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.-- -$0.01 $124M IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.-2.37% $0.03 $9.5B -
What do Analysts Say About NDM.TO or IVN.TO?
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -72.53%. On the other hand Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $17.95 which suggests that it could grow by 30.92%. Given that Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has higher upside potential than Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. is more attractive than Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NDM.TONorthern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.2 0 0 IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.9 1 0 -
Is NDM.TO or IVN.TO More Risky?
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 0.151, which suggesting that the stock is 84.853% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has a beta of 1.958, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.823%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NDM.TO or IVN.TO?
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NDM.TO or IVN.TO?
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues of $178.2M. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$7.9M is lower than Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s net income of $42.1M. Notably, Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.'s PE ratio is 43.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. is -- versus 38.88x for Ivanhoe Mines Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NDM.TONorthern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- -$7.9M IVN.TOIvanhoe Mines Ltd.38.88x 43.18x $178.2M $42.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns NDM.TO or LAC.TO?
Lithium Americas Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of --. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -112.85% beat Lithium Americas Corp.'s return on equity of -32.83%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NDM.TONorthern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.-- -$0.01 $124M LAC.TOLithium Americas Corp.-- -$1.14 $1.8B -
What do Analysts Say About NDM.TO or LAC.TO?
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -72.53%. On the other hand Lithium Americas Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $7.71 which suggests that it could grow by 15.79%. Given that Lithium Americas Corp. has higher upside potential than Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Lithium Americas Corp. is more attractive than Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NDM.TONorthern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.2 0 0 LAC.TOLithium Americas Corp.2 9 0 -
Is NDM.TO or LAC.TO More Risky?
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 0.151, which suggesting that the stock is 84.853% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lithium Americas Corp. has a beta of 1.215, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.54%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NDM.TO or LAC.TO?
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lithium Americas Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lithium Americas Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NDM.TO or LAC.TO?
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lithium Americas Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$7.9M is higher than Lithium Americas Corp.'s net income of -$274.3M. Notably, Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lithium Americas Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. is -- versus -- for Lithium Americas Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NDM.TONorthern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- -$7.9M LAC.TOLithium Americas Corp.-- -- -- -$274.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns NDM.TO or TECK.B.TO?
Teck Resources Limited has a net margin of -- compared to Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of 3.93%. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -112.85% beat Teck Resources Limited's return on equity of 3.02%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NDM.TONorthern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.-- -$0.01 $124M TECK.B.TOTeck Resources Limited17.16% $0.57 $35.4B -
What do Analysts Say About NDM.TO or TECK.B.TO?
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -72.53%. On the other hand Teck Resources Limited has an analysts' consensus of $62.94 which suggests that it could grow by 6.14%. Given that Teck Resources Limited has higher upside potential than Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Teck Resources Limited is more attractive than Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NDM.TONorthern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.2 0 0 TECK.B.TOTeck Resources Limited6 8 2 -
Is NDM.TO or TECK.B.TO More Risky?
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 0.151, which suggesting that the stock is 84.853% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Teck Resources Limited has a beta of 1.503, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.25%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NDM.TO or TECK.B.TO?
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Teck Resources Limited offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teck Resources Limited pays out 79.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Teck Resources Limited's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NDM.TO or TECK.B.TO?
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Teck Resources Limited quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$7.9M is lower than Teck Resources Limited's net income of $133M. Notably, Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Teck Resources Limited's PE ratio is 24.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. is -- versus 2.83x for Teck Resources Limited. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NDM.TONorthern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- -$7.9M TECK.B.TOTeck Resources Limited2.83x 24.51x $3.4B $133M
-
Which has Higher Returns NDM.TO or TMQ.TO?
Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of --. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -112.85% beat Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.08%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NDM.TONorthern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.-- -$0.01 $124M TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -$0.01 $176.8M -
What do Analysts Say About NDM.TO or TMQ.TO?
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -72.53%. On the other hand Trilogy Metals, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.94 which suggests that it could grow by 29.32%. Given that Trilogy Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Trilogy Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NDM.TONorthern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.2 0 0 TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.1 5 0 -
Is NDM.TO or TMQ.TO More Risky?
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 0.151, which suggesting that the stock is 84.853% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trilogy Metals, Inc. has a beta of 1.720, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.002%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NDM.TO or TMQ.TO?
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trilogy Metals, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trilogy Metals, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NDM.TO or TMQ.TO?
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Trilogy Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -$7.9M is lower than Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Trilogy Metals, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. is -- versus -- for Trilogy Metals, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NDM.TONorthern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- -$7.9M TMQ.TOTrilogy Metals, Inc.-- -- -- -$2.4M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
71
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 16
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 18.2% over the past day.
Sell
33
ZBIO alert for Dec 16
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is up 13.35% over the past day.
Sell
38
HUT alert for Dec 16
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 3.92% over the past day.
