Financhill
Buy
59

EMN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$71.42
Seasonality move :
9.11%
Day range:
$67.82 - $72.38
52-week range:
$56.11 - $103.82
Dividend yield:
4.8%
P/E ratio:
16.93x
P/S ratio:
0.92x
P/B ratio:
1.37x
Volume:
4M
Avg. volume:
1.6M
1-year change:
-25.2%
Market cap:
$7.9B
Revenue:
$8.8B
EPS (TTM):
$4.09

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
EMN
Eastman Chemical Co.
$2B $0.72 -5.48% -23.46% $73.94
CENX
Century Aluminum Co.
$661.6M $1.30 4.84% 207.24% $50.00
FRD
Friedman Industries, Inc.
-- -- -- -- --
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum Corp.
$902M $1.51 4.58% 34.76% $112.50
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
-- -$0.02 -- -50% $1.70
XPL
Solitario Resources Corp.
-- -$0.01 -- -64.16% $1.50
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
EMN
Eastman Chemical Co.
$69.32 $73.94 $7.9B 16.93x $0.84 4.8% 0.92x
CENX
Century Aluminum Co.
$45.33 $50.00 $4.2B 56.76x $0.00 0% 1.75x
FRD
Friedman Industries, Inc.
$19.63 -- $139.6M 12.06x $0.04 0.82% 0.27x
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum Corp.
$122.62 $112.50 $2B 22.15x $0.77 2.51% 0.63x
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
$1.77 $1.70 $138.7M -- $0.00 0% --
XPL
Solitario Resources Corp.
$0.78 $1.50 $70.9M -- $0.00 0% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
EMN
Eastman Chemical Co.
46.79% 0.437 -- 0.66x
CENX
Century Aluminum Co.
45.47% 1.088 22.94% 0.71x
FRD
Friedman Industries, Inc.
39.84% 0.329 59.86% 0.95x
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum Corp.
57.11% 1.536 85.84% 0.92x
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
27.01% 1.458 12.18% 1.08x
XPL
Solitario Resources Corp.
0.07% 0.553 0.03% 17.12x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
EMN
Eastman Chemical Co.
$338M $121M 4.33% 11.97% 6.13% $390M
CENX
Century Aluminum Co.
$77.3M $58.3M 5.64% 10.05% 9.22% -$18.1M
FRD
Friedman Industries, Inc.
$9.2M $2.9M 6.68% 8.53% 1.89% -$2M
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum Corp.
$82.7M $48.8M 5.03% 12.44% 5.79% $34.5M
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
-$95.7K -$1.5M -25.69% -34.36% -- -$1.1M
XPL
Solitario Resources Corp.
-$18K -$2M -20.56% -20.59% -- -$1.7M

Eastman Chemical Co. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns EMN or CENX?

    Century Aluminum Co. has a net margin of 5.32% compared to Eastman Chemical Co.'s net margin of 1.68%. Eastman Chemical Co.'s return on equity of 11.97% beat Century Aluminum Co.'s return on equity of 10.05%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical Co.
    17.13% $0.92 $10.9B
    CENX
    Century Aluminum Co.
    12.23% $0.14 $1.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About EMN or CENX?

    Eastman Chemical Co. has a consensus price target of $73.94, signalling upside risk potential of 5.85%. On the other hand Century Aluminum Co. has an analysts' consensus of $50.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.3%. Given that Century Aluminum Co. has higher upside potential than Eastman Chemical Co., analysts believe Century Aluminum Co. is more attractive than Eastman Chemical Co..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical Co.
    7 7 0
    CENX
    Century Aluminum Co.
    3 0 0
  • Is EMN or CENX More Risky?

    Eastman Chemical Co. has a beta of 1.237, which suggesting that the stock is 23.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum Co. has a beta of 2.237, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.674%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMN or CENX?

    Eastman Chemical Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.8%. Century Aluminum Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eastman Chemical Co. pays 81.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eastman Chemical Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EMN or CENX?

    Eastman Chemical Co. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Century Aluminum Co. quarterly revenues of $632.2M. Eastman Chemical Co.'s net income of $105M is higher than Century Aluminum Co.'s net income of $10.6M. Notably, Eastman Chemical Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.93x while Century Aluminum Co.'s PE ratio is 56.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical Co. is 0.92x versus 1.75x for Century Aluminum Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical Co.
    0.92x 16.93x $2B $105M
    CENX
    Century Aluminum Co.
    1.75x 56.76x $632.2M $10.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns EMN or FRD?

    Friedman Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 5.32% compared to Eastman Chemical Co.'s net margin of 1.45%. Eastman Chemical Co.'s return on equity of 11.97% beat Friedman Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.53%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical Co.
    17.13% $0.92 $10.9B
    FRD
    Friedman Industries, Inc.
    6.02% $0.32 $231.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About EMN or FRD?

    Eastman Chemical Co. has a consensus price target of $73.94, signalling upside risk potential of 5.85%. On the other hand Friedman Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eastman Chemical Co. has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, Inc., analysts believe Eastman Chemical Co. is more attractive than Friedman Industries, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical Co.
    7 7 0
    FRD
    Friedman Industries, Inc.
    0 0 0
  • Is EMN or FRD More Risky?

    Eastman Chemical Co. has a beta of 1.237, which suggesting that the stock is 23.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.554, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.388%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMN or FRD?

    Eastman Chemical Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.8%. Friedman Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Eastman Chemical Co. pays 81.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries, Inc. pays out 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EMN or FRD?

    Eastman Chemical Co. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Friedman Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $152.4M. Eastman Chemical Co.'s net income of $105M is higher than Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net income of $2.2M. Notably, Eastman Chemical Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.93x while Friedman Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical Co. is 0.92x versus 0.27x for Friedman Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical Co.
    0.92x 16.93x $2B $105M
    FRD
    Friedman Industries, Inc.
    0.27x 12.06x $152.4M $2.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns EMN or KALU?

    Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a net margin of 5.32% compared to Eastman Chemical Co.'s net margin of 4.68%. Eastman Chemical Co.'s return on equity of 11.97% beat Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s return on equity of 12.44%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical Co.
    17.13% $0.92 $10.9B
    KALU
    Kaiser Aluminum Corp.
    9.8% $2.38 $1.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About EMN or KALU?

    Eastman Chemical Co. has a consensus price target of $73.94, signalling upside risk potential of 5.85%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $112.50 which suggests that it could fall by -8.25%. Given that Eastman Chemical Co. has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum Corp., analysts believe Eastman Chemical Co. is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical Co.
    7 7 0
    KALU
    Kaiser Aluminum Corp.
    0 2 0
  • Is EMN or KALU More Risky?

    Eastman Chemical Co. has a beta of 1.237, which suggesting that the stock is 23.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a beta of 1.421, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.06%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMN or KALU?

    Eastman Chemical Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.8%. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. offers a yield of 2.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Eastman Chemical Co. pays 81.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. pays out 107.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Eastman Chemical Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EMN or KALU?

    Eastman Chemical Co. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Kaiser Aluminum Corp. quarterly revenues of $843.5M. Eastman Chemical Co.'s net income of $105M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s net income of $39.5M. Notably, Eastman Chemical Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.93x while Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s PE ratio is 22.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical Co. is 0.92x versus 0.63x for Kaiser Aluminum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical Co.
    0.92x 16.93x $2B $105M
    KALU
    Kaiser Aluminum Corp.
    0.63x 22.15x $843.5M $39.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns EMN or PZG?

    Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of 5.32% compared to Eastman Chemical Co.'s net margin of --. Eastman Chemical Co.'s return on equity of 11.97% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -34.36%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical Co.
    17.13% $0.92 $10.9B
    PZG
    Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
    -- -$0.06 $43.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About EMN or PZG?

    Eastman Chemical Co. has a consensus price target of $73.94, signalling upside risk potential of 5.85%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could fall by -3.96%. Given that Eastman Chemical Co. has higher upside potential than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp., analysts believe Eastman Chemical Co. is more attractive than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical Co.
    7 7 0
    PZG
    Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
    1 0 0
  • Is EMN or PZG More Risky?

    Eastman Chemical Co. has a beta of 1.237, which suggesting that the stock is 23.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.307, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.705%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMN or PZG?

    Eastman Chemical Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.8%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eastman Chemical Co. pays 81.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eastman Chemical Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EMN or PZG?

    Eastman Chemical Co. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Eastman Chemical Co.'s net income of $105M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Eastman Chemical Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.93x while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical Co. is 0.92x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical Co.
    0.92x 16.93x $2B $105M
    PZG
    Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
    -- -- -- -$4.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns EMN or XPL?

    Solitario Resources Corp. has a net margin of 5.32% compared to Eastman Chemical Co.'s net margin of --. Eastman Chemical Co.'s return on equity of 11.97% beat Solitario Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -20.59%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical Co.
    17.13% $0.92 $10.9B
    XPL
    Solitario Resources Corp.
    -- -$0.02 $24.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About EMN or XPL?

    Eastman Chemical Co. has a consensus price target of $73.94, signalling upside risk potential of 5.85%. On the other hand Solitario Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 92.36%. Given that Solitario Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than Eastman Chemical Co., analysts believe Solitario Resources Corp. is more attractive than Eastman Chemical Co..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical Co.
    7 7 0
    XPL
    Solitario Resources Corp.
    2 0 0
  • Is EMN or XPL More Risky?

    Eastman Chemical Co. has a beta of 1.237, which suggesting that the stock is 23.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.452, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.823%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMN or XPL?

    Eastman Chemical Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.8%. Solitario Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eastman Chemical Co. pays 81.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eastman Chemical Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EMN or XPL?

    Eastman Chemical Co. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Solitario Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Eastman Chemical Co.'s net income of $105M is higher than Solitario Resources Corp.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Eastman Chemical Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.93x while Solitario Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical Co. is 0.92x versus -- for Solitario Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EMN
    Eastman Chemical Co.
    0.92x 16.93x $2B $105M
    XPL
    Solitario Resources Corp.
    -- -- -- -$1.9M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

How Big Will the SpaceX IPO Be?
How Big Will the SpaceX IPO Be?

Operated up to now as a private business, SpaceX will…

Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?

Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG) is the innovative medical tech business behind…

Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?
Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?

UAV and hypersonic system defense contractor Kratos (NASDAQ:KTOS) has swung…

Stock Ideas

Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x

Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Sell
50
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Alerts

Sell
40
GDXU alert for Feb 2

MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is down 5.48% over the past day.

Sell
34
PFSI alert for Feb 2

PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. [PFSI] is down 7.24% over the past day.

Sell
40
SHNY alert for Feb 2

MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETN [SHNY] is down 12.51% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock