EMN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has a net margin of 5.31% compared to Eastman Chemical Co.'s net margin of --. Eastman Chemical Co.'s return on equity of 8.03% beat Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Eastman Chemical Co. has a consensus price target of $76.56, signalling downside risk potential of -3.28%. On the other hand Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eastman Chemical Co. has higher upside potential than Blue Star Opportunities Corp., analysts believe Eastman Chemical Co. is more attractive than Blue Star Opportunities Corp..

Eastman Chemical Co. has a beta of 1.237, which suggesting that the stock is 23.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has a beta of -0.473, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 147.266%.

Eastman Chemical Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.21%. Blue Star Opportunities Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eastman Chemical Co. pays 81.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Star Opportunities Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eastman Chemical Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eastman Chemical Co. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Blue Star Opportunities Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Eastman Chemical Co.'s net income of $105M is higher than Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, Eastman Chemical Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.36x while Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s PE ratio is 18.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical Co. is 1.05x versus 0.46x for Blue Star Opportunities Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Century Aluminum Co. has a net margin of 5.31% compared to Eastman Chemical Co.'s net margin of -0.58%. Eastman Chemical Co.'s return on equity of 8.03% beat Century Aluminum Co.'s return on equity of 3.2%.

Eastman Chemical Co. has a consensus price target of $76.56, signalling downside risk potential of -3.28%. On the other hand Century Aluminum Co. has an analysts' consensus of $62.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.78%. Given that Century Aluminum Co. has higher upside potential than Eastman Chemical Co., analysts believe Century Aluminum Co. is more attractive than Eastman Chemical Co..

Eastman Chemical Co. has a beta of 1.237, which suggesting that the stock is 23.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum Co. has a beta of 2.237, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.674%.

Eastman Chemical Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.21%. Century Aluminum Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eastman Chemical Co. pays 81.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eastman Chemical Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eastman Chemical Co. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Century Aluminum Co. quarterly revenues of $633.7M. Eastman Chemical Co.'s net income of $105M is higher than Century Aluminum Co.'s net income of -$3.7M. Notably, Eastman Chemical Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.36x while Century Aluminum Co.'s PE ratio is 133.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical Co. is 1.05x versus 2.03x for Century Aluminum Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a net margin of 5.31% compared to Eastman Chemical Co.'s net margin of -26.57%. Eastman Chemical Co.'s return on equity of 8.03% beat Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.67%.

Eastman Chemical Co. has a consensus price target of $76.56, signalling downside risk potential of -3.28%. On the other hand Greystone Logistics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eastman Chemical Co. has higher upside potential than Greystone Logistics, Inc., analysts believe Eastman Chemical Co. is more attractive than Greystone Logistics, Inc..

Eastman Chemical Co. has a beta of 1.237, which suggesting that the stock is 23.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.105, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.451%.

Eastman Chemical Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.21%. Greystone Logistics, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eastman Chemical Co. pays 81.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Greystone Logistics, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eastman Chemical Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eastman Chemical Co. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Greystone Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.8M. Eastman Chemical Co.'s net income of $105M is higher than Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Eastman Chemical Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.36x while Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical Co. is 1.05x versus 0.18x for Greystone Logistics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a net margin of 5.31% compared to Eastman Chemical Co.'s net margin of 3.04%. Eastman Chemical Co.'s return on equity of 8.03% beat Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s return on equity of 14.39%.

Eastman Chemical Co. has a consensus price target of $76.56, signalling downside risk potential of -3.28%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $124.50 which suggests that it could fall by -5.83%. Given that Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has more downside risk than Eastman Chemical Co., analysts believe Eastman Chemical Co. is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum Corp..

Eastman Chemical Co. has a beta of 1.237, which suggesting that the stock is 23.698% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a beta of 1.421, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.06%.

Eastman Chemical Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.21%. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Eastman Chemical Co. pays 81.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. pays out 45.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eastman Chemical Co. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Kaiser Aluminum Corp. quarterly revenues of $929M. Eastman Chemical Co.'s net income of $105M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s net income of $28.2M. Notably, Eastman Chemical Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.36x while Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s PE ratio is 19.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eastman Chemical Co. is 1.05x versus 0.63x for Kaiser Aluminum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.