CENX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Constellium SE has a net margin of 4.69% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of 1.87%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 18.99% beat Constellium SE's return on equity of 7.91%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $22.50, signalling upside risk potential of 15.92%. On the other hand Constellium SE has an analysts' consensus of $16.79 which suggests that it could grow by 16.18%. Given that Constellium SE has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum, analysts believe Constellium SE is more attractive than Century Aluminum.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.547, which suggesting that the stock is 154.749% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellium SE has a beta of 1.627, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.72%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Constellium SE offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Constellium SE pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $633.9M, which are smaller than Constellium SE quarterly revenues of $2B. Century Aluminum's net income of $29.7M is lower than Constellium SE's net income of $37M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.73x while Constellium SE's PE ratio is 31.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.80x versus 0.29x for Constellium SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fuse Group Holding has a net margin of 4.69% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of --. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 18.99% beat Fuse Group Holding's return on equity of --.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $22.50, signalling upside risk potential of 15.92%. On the other hand Fuse Group Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Fuse Group Holding, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Fuse Group Holding.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.547, which suggesting that the stock is 154.749% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuse Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fuse Group Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fuse Group Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $633.9M, which are larger than Fuse Group Holding quarterly revenues of --. Century Aluminum's net income of $29.7M is higher than Fuse Group Holding's net income of --. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.73x while Fuse Group Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.80x versus -- for Fuse Group Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of 4.69% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of 2.78%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 18.99% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $22.50, signalling upside risk potential of 15.92%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $69.00 which suggests that it could fall by -22.76%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.547, which suggesting that the stock is 154.749% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.443, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.285%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 3.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $633.9M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $777.4M. Century Aluminum's net income of $29.7M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.73x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 33.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.80x versus 0.48x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 4.69% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of 4.97%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 18.99% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $22.50, signalling upside risk potential of 15.92%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $148.14 which suggests that it could grow by 7.84%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.547, which suggesting that the stock is 154.749% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.370, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.988%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $633.9M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Century Aluminum's net income of $29.7M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.73x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 18.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.80x versus 1.23x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.