CLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commercial Metals has a net margin of -10.69% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 1.45%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75% beat Commercial Metals's return on equity of 1.76%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $10.51, signalling upside risk potential of 50.16%. On the other hand Commercial Metals has an analysts' consensus of $52.17 which suggests that it could grow by 13.18%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Commercial Metals, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Commercial Metals.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.035, which suggesting that the stock is 103.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.238%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Metals offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals pays out 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Commercial Metals quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M is lower than Commercial Metals's net income of $25.5M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Commercial Metals's PE ratio is 76.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.18x versus 0.69x for Commercial Metals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of -10.69% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 2.78%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $10.51, signalling upside risk potential of 50.16%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $69.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1.95%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.035, which suggesting that the stock is 103.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.398, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.799%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $777.4M. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M is lower than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 25.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.18x versus 0.36x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of -10.69% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 1.99%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75% beat Nucor's return on equity of 6.22%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $10.51, signalling upside risk potential of 50.16%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $146.74 which suggests that it could grow by 27.35%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Nucor, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Nucor.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.035, which suggesting that the stock is 103.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.733, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.341%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 25.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M is lower than Nucor's net income of $156M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Nucor's PE ratio is 20.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.18x versus 0.89x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of -10.69% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 4.97%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $10.51, signalling upside risk potential of 50.16%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $146.11 which suggests that it could grow by 11.96%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.035, which suggesting that the stock is 103.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.442, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.234%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 17.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.18x versus 1.17x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.