Financhill
Sell
24

CLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$7.44
Seasonality move :
4.11%
Day range:
$7.25 - $7.47
52-week range:
$6.17 - $18.03
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
175.97x
P/S ratio:
0.19x
P/B ratio:
0.59x
Volume:
14.9M
Avg. volume:
22.6M
1-year change:
-58.45%
Market cap:
$3.7B
Revenue:
$19.2B
EPS (TTM):
-$2.44

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CLF
Cleveland-Cliffs
$4.6B -$0.83 -2.91% -492.86% $10.04
CENX
Century Aluminum
$527M $0.59 8.08% -73.89% $23.00
CMC
Commercial Metals
$1.8B $0.30 -1.73% -21.57% $52.17
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum
$800.1M $0.60 1.72% 287.71% $69.00
NUE
Nucor
$7.3B $0.67 3.9% -17.59% $146.74
STLD
Steel Dynamics
$4.2B $1.38 4.28% 0.19% $146.11
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CLF
Cleveland-Cliffs
$7.43 $10.04 $3.7B 175.97x $0.00 0% 0.19x
CENX
Century Aluminum
$16.52 $23.00 $1.5B 14.24x $0.00 0% 0.68x
CMC
Commercial Metals
$48.03 $52.17 $5.4B 80.05x $0.18 1.5% 0.72x
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum
$70.97 $69.00 $1.1B 26.58x $0.77 4.34% 0.38x
NUE
Nucor
$117.10 $146.74 $27B 20.84x $0.55 1.86% 0.91x
STLD
Steel Dynamics
$133.72 $146.11 $19.9B 17.66x $0.50 1.41% 1.20x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CLF
Cleveland-Cliffs
54.86% 1.496 176.98% 0.57x
CENX
Century Aluminum
39.92% 1.881 28.46% 0.54x
CMC
Commercial Metals
22.95% 1.474 21.78% 1.66x
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum
57.93% 1.328 106.4% 1.17x
NUE
Nucor
28.19% 1.629 27.37% 1.39x
STLD
Steel Dynamics
32.23% 1.390 22.45% 1.29x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CLF
Cleveland-Cliffs
-$391M -$535M -9.7% -16.75% -10.59% -$503M
CENX
Century Aluminum
$60.6M $46.1M 10.58% 18.99% 6.17% $51.1M
CMC
Commercial Metals
$219.5M $52M 1.37% 1.76% 2.69% -$53.8M
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum
$104M $43.2M 2.54% 6.41% 5.15% $18.8M
NUE
Nucor
$605M $324M 4.68% 6.22% 4.14% -$495M
STLD
Steel Dynamics
$486.5M $297.8M 9.41% 13% 6.7% -$152.9M

Cleveland-Cliffs vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CLF or CENX?

    Century Aluminum has a net margin of -10.69% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 4.69%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 18.99%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLF
    Cleveland-Cliffs
    -8.45% -$1.00 $14.1B
    CENX
    Century Aluminum
    9.56% $0.29 $1.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLF or CENX?

    Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $10.04, signalling upside risk potential of 35.07%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $23.00 which suggests that it could grow by 37.21%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLF
    Cleveland-Cliffs
    3 6 1
    CENX
    Century Aluminum
    2 0 0
  • Is CLF or CENX More Risky?

    Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.035, which suggesting that the stock is 103.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.697, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 169.68%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLF or CENX?

    Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLF or CENX?

    Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $633.9M. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $29.7M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 14.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.19x versus 0.68x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLF
    Cleveland-Cliffs
    0.19x 175.97x $4.6B -$495M
    CENX
    Century Aluminum
    0.68x 14.24x $633.9M $29.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns CLF or CMC?

    Commercial Metals has a net margin of -10.69% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 1.45%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75% beat Commercial Metals's return on equity of 1.76%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLF
    Cleveland-Cliffs
    -8.45% -$1.00 $14.1B
    CMC
    Commercial Metals
    12.51% $0.22 $5.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLF or CMC?

    Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $10.04, signalling upside risk potential of 35.07%. On the other hand Commercial Metals has an analysts' consensus of $52.17 which suggests that it could grow by 8.61%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Commercial Metals, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Commercial Metals.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLF
    Cleveland-Cliffs
    3 6 1
    CMC
    Commercial Metals
    2 8 0
  • Is CLF or CMC More Risky?

    Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.035, which suggesting that the stock is 103.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.238%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLF or CMC?

    Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Metals offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals pays out 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLF or CMC?

    Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Commercial Metals quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M is lower than Commercial Metals's net income of $25.5M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Commercial Metals's PE ratio is 80.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.19x versus 0.72x for Commercial Metals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLF
    Cleveland-Cliffs
    0.19x 175.97x $4.6B -$495M
    CMC
    Commercial Metals
    0.72x 80.05x $1.8B $25.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns CLF or KALU?

    Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of -10.69% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 2.78%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLF
    Cleveland-Cliffs
    -8.45% -$1.00 $14.1B
    KALU
    Kaiser Aluminum
    13.38% $1.31 $1.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLF or KALU?

    Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $10.04, signalling upside risk potential of 35.07%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $69.00 which suggests that it could fall by -2.78%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLF
    Cleveland-Cliffs
    3 6 1
    KALU
    Kaiser Aluminum
    1 2 0
  • Is CLF or KALU More Risky?

    Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.035, which suggesting that the stock is 103.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.398, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.799%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLF or KALU?

    Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLF or KALU?

    Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $777.4M. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M is lower than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 26.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.19x versus 0.38x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLF
    Cleveland-Cliffs
    0.19x 175.97x $4.6B -$495M
    KALU
    Kaiser Aluminum
    0.38x 26.58x $777.4M $21.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns CLF or NUE?

    Nucor has a net margin of -10.69% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 1.99%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75% beat Nucor's return on equity of 6.22%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLF
    Cleveland-Cliffs
    -8.45% -$1.00 $14.1B
    NUE
    Nucor
    7.73% $0.67 $29B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLF or NUE?

    Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $10.04, signalling upside risk potential of 35.07%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $146.74 which suggests that it could grow by 25.31%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Nucor, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Nucor.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLF
    Cleveland-Cliffs
    3 6 1
    NUE
    Nucor
    5 5 0
  • Is CLF or NUE More Risky?

    Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.035, which suggesting that the stock is 103.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.733, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.341%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLF or NUE?

    Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 25.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLF or NUE?

    Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M is lower than Nucor's net income of $156M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Nucor's PE ratio is 20.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.19x versus 0.91x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLF
    Cleveland-Cliffs
    0.19x 175.97x $4.6B -$495M
    NUE
    Nucor
    0.91x 20.84x $7.8B $156M
  • Which has Higher Returns CLF or STLD?

    Steel Dynamics has a net margin of -10.69% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 4.97%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLF
    Cleveland-Cliffs
    -8.45% -$1.00 $14.1B
    STLD
    Steel Dynamics
    11.14% $1.44 $13B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLF or STLD?

    Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $10.04, signalling upside risk potential of 35.07%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $146.11 which suggests that it could grow by 9.27%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLF
    Cleveland-Cliffs
    3 6 1
    STLD
    Steel Dynamics
    6 5 0
  • Is CLF or STLD More Risky?

    Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.035, which suggesting that the stock is 103.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.442, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.234%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLF or STLD?

    Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLF or STLD?

    Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 17.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.19x versus 1.20x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLF
    Cleveland-Cliffs
    0.19x 175.97x $4.6B -$495M
    STLD
    Steel Dynamics
    1.20x 17.66x $4.4B $217.2M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will Uber Stock 5X?
Will Uber Stock 5X?

Uber (NYSE:UBER) has generated extremely strong returns for its investors…

How High Will Bloom Energy Stock Go?
How High Will Bloom Energy Stock Go?

Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) has seen its shares surge by more…

Is Acuity a Good Stock to Buy Now?
Is Acuity a Good Stock to Buy Now?

Acuity Brands (NYSE:AYI) is an industrial company specializing in lighting.…

Stock Ideas

Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Buy
74
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x

Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Alerts

Buy
71
NUTX alert for May 15

Nutex Health [NUTX] is up 9.76% over the past day.

Buy
85
EXEL alert for May 16

Exelixis [EXEL] is up 3.67% over the past day.

Sell
32
GLBE alert for May 16

Global E Online [GLBE] is down 3.44% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock