CLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nucor Corp. has a net margin of -4.88% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net margin of 5.5%. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.11% beat Nucor Corp.'s return on equity of 9.41%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.49, signalling downside risk potential of -1.97%. On the other hand Nucor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $185.31 which suggests that it could grow by 4.27%. Given that Nucor Corp. has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc., analysts believe Nucor Corp. is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc..

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a beta of 1.912, which suggesting that the stock is 91.215% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor Corp. has a beta of 1.871, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.125%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nucor Corp. offers a yield of 1.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor Corp. pays out 29.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than Nucor Corp. quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net income of -$231M is lower than Nucor Corp.'s net income of $423M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Nucor Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. is 0.36x versus 1.26x for Nucor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reliance, Inc. has a net margin of -4.88% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net margin of 5.2%. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.11% beat Reliance, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.07%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.49, signalling downside risk potential of -1.97%. On the other hand Reliance, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $324.63 which suggests that it could fall by -1.48%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has more downside risk than Reliance, Inc., analysts believe Reliance, Inc. is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc..

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a beta of 1.912, which suggesting that the stock is 91.215% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliance, Inc. has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.792%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Reliance, Inc. offers a yield of 1.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Reliance, Inc. pays out 28.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Reliance, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Reliance, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net income of -$231M is lower than Reliance, Inc.'s net income of $190M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Reliance, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. is 0.36x versus 1.26x for Reliance, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a net margin of -4.88% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net margin of 5.99%. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.11% beat Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.33%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.49, signalling downside risk potential of -1.97%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $193.10 which suggests that it could grow by 7.53%. Given that Steel Dynamics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc., analysts believe Steel Dynamics, Inc. is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc..

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a beta of 1.912, which suggesting that the stock is 91.215% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.476, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.62%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics, Inc. offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays out 25.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net income of -$231M is lower than Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $264.5M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. is 0.36x versus 1.47x for Steel Dynamics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a net margin of -4.88% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net margin of 2.47%. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.11% beat Worthington Steel, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.64%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.49, signalling downside risk potential of -1.97%. On the other hand Worthington Steel, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $47.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.83%. Given that Worthington Steel, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc., analysts believe Worthington Steel, Inc. is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc..

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a beta of 1.912, which suggesting that the stock is 91.215% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worthington Steel, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Worthington Steel, Inc. offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Worthington Steel, Inc. pays out 29.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Worthington Steel, Inc. quarterly revenues of $871.9M. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net income of -$231M is lower than Worthington Steel, Inc.'s net income of $21.5M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Worthington Steel, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. is 0.36x versus 0.62x for Worthington Steel, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.