CLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum Co. has a net margin of -5.4% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net margin of -0.58%. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s return on equity of -22.55% beat Century Aluminum Co.'s return on equity of 3.09%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.41, signalling upside risk potential of 50.35%. On the other hand Century Aluminum Co. has an analysts' consensus of $63.33 which suggests that it could grow by 9.74%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum Co., analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. is more attractive than Century Aluminum Co..

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a beta of 1.988, which suggesting that the stock is 98.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum Co. has a beta of 2.167, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 116.713%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Aluminum Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Century Aluminum Co. quarterly revenues of $633.7M. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net income of -$233M is lower than Century Aluminum Co.'s net income of -$3.7M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Century Aluminum Co.'s PE ratio is 145.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. is 0.24x versus 2.22x for Century Aluminum Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor Corp. has a net margin of -5.4% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net margin of 5.48%. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s return on equity of -22.55% beat Nucor Corp.'s return on equity of 9.4%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.41, signalling upside risk potential of 50.35%. On the other hand Nucor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $187.31 which suggests that it could grow by 13.06%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nucor Corp., analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. is more attractive than Nucor Corp..

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a beta of 1.988, which suggesting that the stock is 98.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor Corp. has a beta of 1.834, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.423%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nucor Corp. offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor Corp. pays out 29.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are smaller than Nucor Corp. quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net income of -$233M is lower than Nucor Corp.'s net income of $421M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Nucor Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. is 0.24x versus 1.18x for Nucor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a net margin of -5.4% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net margin of 5.99%. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s return on equity of -22.55% beat Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.33%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.41, signalling upside risk potential of 50.35%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $194.92 which suggests that it could grow by 11.32%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, Inc., analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. is more attractive than Steel Dynamics, Inc..

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a beta of 1.988, which suggesting that the stock is 98.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.428, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.827%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics, Inc. offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays out 25.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net income of -$233M is lower than Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $264.5M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. is 0.24x versus 1.43x for Steel Dynamics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a net margin of -5.4% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net margin of 2.47%. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s return on equity of -22.55% beat Worthington Steel, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.64%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.41, signalling upside risk potential of 50.35%. On the other hand Worthington Steel, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $47.00 which suggests that it could grow by 43.82%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has higher upside potential than Worthington Steel, Inc., analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. is more attractive than Worthington Steel, Inc..

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a beta of 1.988, which suggesting that the stock is 98.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worthington Steel, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Worthington Steel, Inc. offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Worthington Steel, Inc. pays out 29.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Worthington Steel, Inc. quarterly revenues of $871.9M. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net income of -$233M is lower than Worthington Steel, Inc.'s net income of $21.5M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Worthington Steel, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. is 0.24x versus 0.50x for Worthington Steel, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.