CLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MP Materials Corp. has a net margin of -4.88% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net margin of -78.02%. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.11% beat MP Materials Corp.'s return on equity of -8.99%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a consensus price target of $12.45, signalling downside risk potential of -2.39%. On the other hand MP Materials Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $79.11 which suggests that it could grow by 34.74%. Given that MP Materials Corp. has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc., analysts believe MP Materials Corp. is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc..

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a beta of 1.974, which suggesting that the stock is 97.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MP Materials Corp. has a beta of 1.695, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.479%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MP Materials Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MP Materials Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than MP Materials Corp. quarterly revenues of $53.6M. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net income of -$231M is lower than MP Materials Corp.'s net income of -$41.8M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while MP Materials Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. is 0.34x versus 42.00x for MP Materials Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor Corp. has a net margin of -4.88% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net margin of 7.99%. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.11% beat Nucor Corp.'s return on equity of 9.09%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a consensus price target of $12.45, signalling downside risk potential of -2.39%. On the other hand Nucor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $169.69 which suggests that it could grow by 3.03%. Given that Nucor Corp. has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc., analysts believe Nucor Corp. is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc..

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a beta of 1.974, which suggesting that the stock is 97.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor Corp. has a beta of 1.855, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.522%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nucor Corp. offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor Corp. pays out 25.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than Nucor Corp. quarterly revenues of $8.5B. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net income of -$231M is lower than Nucor Corp.'s net income of $681M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Nucor Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. is 0.34x versus 1.20x for Nucor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a net margin of -4.88% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net margin of 8.37%. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.11% beat Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.68%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a consensus price target of $12.45, signalling downside risk potential of -2.39%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $169.92 which suggests that it could fall by -0.92%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has more downside risk than Steel Dynamics, Inc., analysts believe Steel Dynamics, Inc. is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc..

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a beta of 1.974, which suggesting that the stock is 97.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.52%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics, Inc. offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays out 18.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net income of -$231M is lower than Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $403.9M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. is 0.34x versus 1.46x for Steel Dynamics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a net margin of -4.88% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net margin of 4.42%. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s return on equity of -25.11% beat Worthington Steel, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.55%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a consensus price target of $12.45, signalling downside risk potential of -2.39%. On the other hand Worthington Steel, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $36.00 which suggests that it could fall by -1.18%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has more downside risk than Worthington Steel, Inc., analysts believe Worthington Steel, Inc. is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc..

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a beta of 1.974, which suggesting that the stock is 97.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worthington Steel, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Worthington Steel, Inc. offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Worthington Steel, Inc. pays out 29.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Worthington Steel, Inc. quarterly revenues of $872.9M. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net income of -$231M is lower than Worthington Steel, Inc.'s net income of $38.6M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Worthington Steel, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. is 0.34x versus 0.58x for Worthington Steel, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.