STLD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commercial Metals Co. has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net margin of 7.18%. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.68% beat Commercial Metals Co.'s return on equity of 2.05%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $169.92, signalling downside risk potential of -0.92%. On the other hand Commercial Metals Co. has an analysts' consensus of $67.85 which suggests that it could grow by 3.02%. Given that Commercial Metals Co. has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, Inc., analysts believe Commercial Metals Co. is more attractive than Steel Dynamics, Inc..

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.465, which suggesting that the stock is 46.52% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Metals Co. has a beta of 1.496, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.554%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.14%. Commercial Metals Co. offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays 18.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals Co. pays out 97.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Commercial Metals Co. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $403.9M is higher than Commercial Metals Co.'s net income of $151.8M. Notably, Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.75x while Commercial Metals Co.'s PE ratio is 86.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics, Inc. is 1.46x versus 0.96x for Commercial Metals Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net margin of 18.19%. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.68% beat Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.56%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $169.92, signalling downside risk potential of -0.92%. On the other hand Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $47.97 which suggests that it could grow by 7.73%. Given that Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, Inc., analysts believe Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. is more attractive than Steel Dynamics, Inc..

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.465, which suggesting that the stock is 46.52% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. has a beta of 1.489, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.93%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.14%. Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays 18.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. pays out 46.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are smaller than Freeport-McMoRan, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $403.9M is lower than Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.75x while Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.'s PE ratio is 31.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics, Inc. is 1.46x versus 2.50x for Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net margin of 1.45%. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.68% beat Friedman Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.53%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $169.92, signalling downside risk potential of -0.92%. On the other hand Friedman Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Steel Dynamics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, Inc., analysts believe Steel Dynamics, Inc. is more attractive than Friedman Industries, Inc..

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.465, which suggesting that the stock is 46.52% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.552, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.197%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.14%. Friedman Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays 18.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries, Inc. pays out 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Friedman Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $152.4M. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $403.9M is higher than Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net income of $2.2M. Notably, Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.75x while Friedman Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics, Inc. is 1.46x versus 0.27x for Friedman Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor Corp. has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net margin of 7.99%. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.68% beat Nucor Corp.'s return on equity of 9.09%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $169.92, signalling downside risk potential of -0.92%. On the other hand Nucor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $169.69 which suggests that it could grow by 3.03%. Given that Nucor Corp. has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, Inc., analysts believe Nucor Corp. is more attractive than Steel Dynamics, Inc..

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.465, which suggesting that the stock is 46.52% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor Corp. has a beta of 1.855, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.522%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.14%. Nucor Corp. offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays 18.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor Corp. pays out 25.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are smaller than Nucor Corp. quarterly revenues of $8.5B. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $403.9M is lower than Nucor Corp.'s net income of $681M. Notably, Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.75x while Nucor Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics, Inc. is 1.46x versus 1.20x for Nucor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.