STLD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commercial Metals Co. has a net margin of 5.99% compared to Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net margin of 8.36%. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.33% beat Commercial Metals Co.'s return on equity of 10.61%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $194.92, signalling downside risk potential of -1.28%. On the other hand Commercial Metals Co. has an analysts' consensus of $81.70 which suggests that it could grow by 14.09%. Given that Commercial Metals Co. has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, Inc., analysts believe Commercial Metals Co. is more attractive than Steel Dynamics, Inc..

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.428, which suggesting that the stock is 42.827% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Metals Co. has a beta of 1.467, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.718%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. Commercial Metals Co. offers a yield of 1.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays 25.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals Co. pays out 97.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Commercial Metals Co. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $264.5M is higher than Commercial Metals Co.'s net income of $177.3M. Notably, Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.68x while Commercial Metals Co.'s PE ratio is 18.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics, Inc. is 1.61x versus 1.01x for Commercial Metals Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 5.99% compared to Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net margin of 1.78%. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.33% beat Friedman Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.41%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $194.92, signalling downside risk potential of -1.28%. On the other hand Friedman Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Steel Dynamics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, Inc., analysts believe Steel Dynamics, Inc. is more attractive than Friedman Industries, Inc..

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.428, which suggesting that the stock is 42.827% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.547, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.688%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. Friedman Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays 25.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries, Inc. pays out 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Friedman Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $168M. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $264.5M is higher than Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net income of $3M. Notably, Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.68x while Friedman Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics, Inc. is 1.61x versus 0.22x for Friedman Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor Corp. has a net margin of 5.99% compared to Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net margin of 5.48%. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.33% beat Nucor Corp.'s return on equity of 9.4%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $194.92, signalling downside risk potential of -1.28%. On the other hand Nucor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $187.31 which suggests that it could grow by 5.59%. Given that Nucor Corp. has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, Inc., analysts believe Nucor Corp. is more attractive than Steel Dynamics, Inc..

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.428, which suggesting that the stock is 42.827% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor Corp. has a beta of 1.834, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.423%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. Nucor Corp. offers a yield of 1.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays 25.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor Corp. pays out 29.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are smaller than Nucor Corp. quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $264.5M is lower than Nucor Corp.'s net income of $421M. Notably, Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.68x while Nucor Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics, Inc. is 1.61x versus 1.26x for Nucor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reliance, Inc. has a net margin of 5.99% compared to Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net margin of 3.34%. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.33% beat Reliance, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.28%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $194.92, signalling downside risk potential of -1.28%. On the other hand Reliance, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $330.75 which suggests that it could grow by 5.37%. Given that Reliance, Inc. has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, Inc., analysts believe Reliance, Inc. is more attractive than Steel Dynamics, Inc..

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.428, which suggesting that the stock is 42.827% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliance, Inc. has a beta of 0.912, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.818%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. Reliance, Inc. offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays 25.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Reliance, Inc. pays out 34.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Reliance, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $264.5M is higher than Reliance, Inc.'s net income of $116.9M. Notably, Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.68x while Reliance, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics, Inc. is 1.61x versus 1.16x for Reliance, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.