STLD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commercial Metals Co. has a net margin of 5.99% compared to Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net margin of 8.36%. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.33% beat Commercial Metals Co.'s return on equity of 10.61%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $193.10, signalling downside risk potential of -6.16%. On the other hand Commercial Metals Co. has an analysts' consensus of $80.30 which suggests that it could fall by -3.5%. Given that Steel Dynamics, Inc. has more downside risk than Commercial Metals Co., analysts believe Commercial Metals Co. is more attractive than Steel Dynamics, Inc..

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.462, which suggesting that the stock is 46.217% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Metals Co. has a beta of 1.491, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.05%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.97%. Commercial Metals Co. offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays 25.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals Co. pays out 97.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Commercial Metals Co. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $264.5M is higher than Commercial Metals Co.'s net income of $177.3M. Notably, Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.72x while Commercial Metals Co.'s PE ratio is 21.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics, Inc. is 1.68x versus 1.18x for Commercial Metals Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 5.99% compared to Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net margin of 1.78%. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.33% beat Friedman Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.41%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $193.10, signalling downside risk potential of -6.16%. On the other hand Friedman Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Steel Dynamics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, Inc., analysts believe Steel Dynamics, Inc. is more attractive than Friedman Industries, Inc..

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.462, which suggesting that the stock is 46.217% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.554, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.388%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.97%. Friedman Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays 25.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries, Inc. pays out 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Friedman Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $168M. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $264.5M is higher than Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net income of $3M. Notably, Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.72x while Friedman Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics, Inc. is 1.68x versus 0.25x for Friedman Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor Corp. has a net margin of 5.99% compared to Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net margin of 5.5%. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.33% beat Nucor Corp.'s return on equity of 9.41%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $193.10, signalling downside risk potential of -6.16%. On the other hand Nucor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $186.08 which suggests that it could fall by -4.29%. Given that Steel Dynamics, Inc. has more downside risk than Nucor Corp., analysts believe Nucor Corp. is more attractive than Steel Dynamics, Inc..

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.462, which suggesting that the stock is 46.217% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor Corp. has a beta of 1.858, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.776%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.97%. Nucor Corp. offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays 25.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor Corp. pays out 29.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are smaller than Nucor Corp. quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $264.5M is lower than Nucor Corp.'s net income of $423M. Notably, Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.72x while Nucor Corp.'s PE ratio is 25.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics, Inc. is 1.68x versus 1.38x for Nucor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reliance, Inc. has a net margin of 5.99% compared to Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net margin of 5.2%. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.33% beat Reliance, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.07%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a consensus price target of $193.10, signalling downside risk potential of -6.16%. On the other hand Reliance, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $324.63 which suggests that it could fall by -9.92%. Given that Reliance, Inc. has more downside risk than Steel Dynamics, Inc., analysts believe Steel Dynamics, Inc. is more attractive than Reliance, Inc..

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.462, which suggesting that the stock is 46.217% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliance, Inc. has a beta of 0.918, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.191%.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.97%. Reliance, Inc. offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays 25.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Reliance, Inc. pays out 28.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Reliance, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $264.5M is higher than Reliance, Inc.'s net income of $190M. Notably, Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.72x while Reliance, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics, Inc. is 1.68x versus 1.38x for Reliance, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.