FRD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Metallus, Inc. has a net margin of 1.45% compared to Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net margin of 2.65%. Friedman Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.53% beat Metallus, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.19%.

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Metallus, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.50 which suggests that it could grow by 15.23%. Given that Metallus, Inc. has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, Inc., analysts believe Metallus, Inc. is more attractive than Friedman Industries, Inc..

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.552, which suggesting that the stock is 55.197% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metallus, Inc. has a beta of 1.449, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.907%.

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. Metallus, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Friedman Industries, Inc. pays 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Metallus, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Friedman Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues are $152.4M, which are smaller than Metallus, Inc. quarterly revenues of $305.9M. Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net income of $2.2M is lower than Metallus, Inc.'s net income of $8.1M. Notably, Friedman Industries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Metallus, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Friedman Industries, Inc. is 0.28x versus 0.67x for Metallus, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor Corp. has a net margin of 1.45% compared to Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net margin of 7.99%. Friedman Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.53% beat Nucor Corp.'s return on equity of 9.09%.

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nucor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $177.46 which suggests that it could grow by 6.45%. Given that Nucor Corp. has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, Inc., analysts believe Nucor Corp. is more attractive than Friedman Industries, Inc..

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.552, which suggesting that the stock is 55.197% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor Corp. has a beta of 1.855, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.522%.

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. Nucor Corp. offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Friedman Industries, Inc. pays 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor Corp. pays out 25.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Friedman Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues are $152.4M, which are smaller than Nucor Corp. quarterly revenues of $8.5B. Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net income of $2.2M is lower than Nucor Corp.'s net income of $681M. Notably, Friedman Industries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Nucor Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Friedman Industries, Inc. is 0.28x versus 1.21x for Nucor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reliance, Inc. has a net margin of 1.45% compared to Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net margin of 5.2%. Friedman Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.53% beat Reliance, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.07%.

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Reliance, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $315.63 which suggests that it could grow by 6.38%. Given that Reliance, Inc. has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, Inc., analysts believe Reliance, Inc. is more attractive than Friedman Industries, Inc..

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.552, which suggesting that the stock is 55.197% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliance, Inc. has a beta of 0.919, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.125%.

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. Reliance, Inc. offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Friedman Industries, Inc. pays 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Reliance, Inc. pays out 28.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Friedman Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues are $152.4M, which are smaller than Reliance, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net income of $2.2M is lower than Reliance, Inc.'s net income of $190M. Notably, Friedman Industries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Reliance, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Friedman Industries, Inc. is 0.28x versus 1.14x for Reliance, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a net margin of 1.45% compared to Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net margin of 8.37%. Friedman Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.53% beat Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.68%.

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Steel Dynamics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $180.78 which suggests that it could grow by 3.03%. Given that Steel Dynamics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, Inc., analysts believe Steel Dynamics, Inc. is more attractive than Friedman Industries, Inc..

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.552, which suggesting that the stock is 55.197% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.52%.

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. Steel Dynamics, Inc. offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Friedman Industries, Inc. pays 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays out 18.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Friedman Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues are $152.4M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net income of $2.2M is lower than Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $403.9M. Notably, Friedman Industries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Friedman Industries, Inc. is 0.28x versus 1.49x for Steel Dynamics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.