FRD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Metallus, Inc. has a net margin of 1.78% compared to Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net margin of 2.65%. Friedman Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.41% beat Metallus, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.19%.

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Metallus, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.11%. Given that Metallus, Inc. has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, Inc., analysts believe Metallus, Inc. is more attractive than Friedman Industries, Inc..

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.554, which suggesting that the stock is 55.388% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metallus, Inc. has a beta of 1.485, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.499%.

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Metallus, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Friedman Industries, Inc. pays 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Metallus, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Friedman Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues are $168M, which are smaller than Metallus, Inc. quarterly revenues of $305.9M. Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net income of $3M is lower than Metallus, Inc.'s net income of $8.1M. Notably, Friedman Industries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.21x while Metallus, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Friedman Industries, Inc. is 0.22x versus 0.79x for Metallus, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor Corp. has a net margin of 1.78% compared to Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net margin of 5.5%. Friedman Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.41% beat Nucor Corp.'s return on equity of 9.41%.

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nucor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $186.08 which suggests that it could grow by 3.35%. Given that Nucor Corp. has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, Inc., analysts believe Nucor Corp. is more attractive than Friedman Industries, Inc..

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.554, which suggesting that the stock is 55.388% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor Corp. has a beta of 1.858, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.776%.

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Nucor Corp. offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Friedman Industries, Inc. pays 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor Corp. pays out 29.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Friedman Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues are $168M, which are smaller than Nucor Corp. quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net income of $3M is lower than Nucor Corp.'s net income of $423M. Notably, Friedman Industries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.21x while Nucor Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Friedman Industries, Inc. is 0.22x versus 1.28x for Nucor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reliance, Inc. has a net margin of 1.78% compared to Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net margin of 3.34%. Friedman Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.41% beat Reliance, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.28%.

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Reliance, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $326.63 which suggests that it could fall by -0.81%. Given that Reliance, Inc. has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, Inc., analysts believe Reliance, Inc. is more attractive than Friedman Industries, Inc..

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.554, which suggesting that the stock is 55.388% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliance, Inc. has a beta of 0.918, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.191%.

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Reliance, Inc. offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Friedman Industries, Inc. pays 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Reliance, Inc. pays out 34.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Friedman Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues are $168M, which are smaller than Reliance, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net income of $3M is lower than Reliance, Inc.'s net income of $116.9M. Notably, Friedman Industries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.21x while Reliance, Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Friedman Industries, Inc. is 0.22x versus 1.21x for Reliance, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a net margin of 1.78% compared to Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net margin of 5.99%. Friedman Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.41% beat Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.33%.

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Steel Dynamics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $193.10 which suggests that it could grow by 1.32%. Given that Steel Dynamics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, Inc., analysts believe Steel Dynamics, Inc. is more attractive than Friedman Industries, Inc..

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.554, which suggesting that the stock is 55.388% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.462, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.217%.

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Steel Dynamics, Inc. offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Friedman Industries, Inc. pays 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays out 25.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Friedman Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues are $168M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net income of $3M is lower than Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $264.5M. Notably, Friedman Industries, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.21x while Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Friedman Industries, Inc. is 0.22x versus 1.56x for Steel Dynamics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.