CMC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 8.36% compared to Commercial Metals Co.'s net margin of 1.45%. Commercial Metals Co.'s return on equity of 10.61% beat Friedman Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.53%.

Commercial Metals Co. has a consensus price target of $80.30, signalling upside risk potential of 4.46%. On the other hand Friedman Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Commercial Metals Co. has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, Inc., analysts believe Commercial Metals Co. is more attractive than Friedman Industries, Inc..

Commercial Metals Co. has a beta of 1.495, which suggesting that the stock is 49.509% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.515%.

Commercial Metals Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Friedman Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Commercial Metals Co. pays 97.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries, Inc. pays out 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Commercial Metals Co. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Friedman Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $152.4M. Commercial Metals Co.'s net income of $177.3M is higher than Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net income of $2.2M. Notably, Commercial Metals Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.81x while Friedman Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commercial Metals Co. is 1.09x versus 0.27x for Friedman Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor Corp. has a net margin of 8.36% compared to Commercial Metals Co.'s net margin of 5.5%. Commercial Metals Co.'s return on equity of 10.61% beat Nucor Corp.'s return on equity of 9.41%.

Commercial Metals Co. has a consensus price target of $80.30, signalling upside risk potential of 4.46%. On the other hand Nucor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $185.31 which suggests that it could grow by 4.27%. Given that Commercial Metals Co. has higher upside potential than Nucor Corp., analysts believe Commercial Metals Co. is more attractive than Nucor Corp..

Commercial Metals Co. has a beta of 1.495, which suggesting that the stock is 49.509% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor Corp. has a beta of 1.871, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.125%.

Commercial Metals Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Nucor Corp. offers a yield of 1.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Commercial Metals Co. pays 97.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor Corp. pays out 29.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Commercial Metals Co. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Nucor Corp. quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Commercial Metals Co.'s net income of $177.3M is lower than Nucor Corp.'s net income of $423M. Notably, Commercial Metals Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.81x while Nucor Corp.'s PE ratio is 23.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commercial Metals Co. is 1.09x versus 1.26x for Nucor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reliance, Inc. has a net margin of 8.36% compared to Commercial Metals Co.'s net margin of 5.2%. Commercial Metals Co.'s return on equity of 10.61% beat Reliance, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.07%.

Commercial Metals Co. has a consensus price target of $80.30, signalling upside risk potential of 4.46%. On the other hand Reliance, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $324.63 which suggests that it could fall by -1.48%. Given that Commercial Metals Co. has higher upside potential than Reliance, Inc., analysts believe Commercial Metals Co. is more attractive than Reliance, Inc..

Commercial Metals Co. has a beta of 1.495, which suggesting that the stock is 49.509% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliance, Inc. has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.792%.

Commercial Metals Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Reliance, Inc. offers a yield of 1.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Commercial Metals Co. pays 97.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Reliance, Inc. pays out 28.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Commercial Metals Co. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Reliance, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Commercial Metals Co.'s net income of $177.3M is lower than Reliance, Inc.'s net income of $190M. Notably, Commercial Metals Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.81x while Reliance, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commercial Metals Co. is 1.09x versus 1.26x for Reliance, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a net margin of 8.36% compared to Commercial Metals Co.'s net margin of 5.99%. Commercial Metals Co.'s return on equity of 10.61% beat Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.33%.

Commercial Metals Co. has a consensus price target of $80.30, signalling upside risk potential of 4.46%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $193.10 which suggests that it could grow by 7.53%. Given that Steel Dynamics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Commercial Metals Co., analysts believe Steel Dynamics, Inc. is more attractive than Commercial Metals Co..

Commercial Metals Co. has a beta of 1.495, which suggesting that the stock is 49.509% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics, Inc. has a beta of 1.476, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.62%.

Commercial Metals Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Steel Dynamics, Inc. offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Commercial Metals Co. pays 97.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics, Inc. pays out 25.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Commercial Metals Co. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Commercial Metals Co.'s net income of $177.3M is lower than Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s net income of $264.5M. Notably, Commercial Metals Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.81x while Steel Dynamics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commercial Metals Co. is 1.09x versus 1.47x for Steel Dynamics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.