WS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum Co. has a net margin of 2.47% compared to Worthington Steel, Inc.'s net margin of 1.68%. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.64% beat Century Aluminum Co.'s return on equity of 10.05%.

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a consensus price target of $47.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.97%. On the other hand Century Aluminum Co. has an analysts' consensus of $59.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.4%. Given that Century Aluminum Co. has higher upside potential than Worthington Steel, Inc., analysts believe Century Aluminum Co. is more attractive than Worthington Steel, Inc..

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum Co. has a beta of 2.237, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.674%.

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Century Aluminum Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Worthington Steel, Inc. pays 29.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Worthington Steel, Inc. quarterly revenues are $871.9M, which are larger than Century Aluminum Co. quarterly revenues of $632.2M. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s net income of $21.5M is higher than Century Aluminum Co.'s net income of $10.6M. Notably, Worthington Steel, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.61x while Century Aluminum Co.'s PE ratio is 66.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worthington Steel, Inc. is 0.75x versus 2.07x for Century Aluminum Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a net margin of 2.47% compared to Worthington Steel, Inc.'s net margin of -5.4%. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.64% beat Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s return on equity of -22.55%.

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a consensus price target of $47.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.97%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $13.58 which suggests that it could grow by 8.8%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has higher upside potential than Worthington Steel, Inc., analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. is more attractive than Worthington Steel, Inc..

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a beta of 1.929, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.925%.

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Worthington Steel, Inc. pays 29.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Worthington Steel, Inc. quarterly revenues are $871.9M, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s net income of $21.5M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net income of -$233M. Notably, Worthington Steel, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.61x while Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worthington Steel, Inc. is 0.75x versus 0.34x for Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a net margin of 2.47% compared to Worthington Steel, Inc.'s net margin of 4.68%. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.64% beat Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s return on equity of 12.44%.

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a consensus price target of $47.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.97%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $112.50 which suggests that it could fall by -22.26%. Given that Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has more downside risk than Worthington Steel, Inc., analysts believe Worthington Steel, Inc. is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum Corp..

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a beta of 1.421, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.06%.

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Worthington Steel, Inc. pays 29.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. pays out 107.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s is not.

Worthington Steel, Inc. quarterly revenues are $871.9M, which are larger than Kaiser Aluminum Corp. quarterly revenues of $843.5M. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s net income of $21.5M is lower than Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s net income of $39.5M. Notably, Worthington Steel, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.61x while Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s PE ratio is 26.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worthington Steel, Inc. is 0.75x versus 0.74x for Kaiser Aluminum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of 2.47% compared to Worthington Steel, Inc.'s net margin of --. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.64% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -43.51%.

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a consensus price target of $47.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.97%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $3.25 which suggests that it could grow by 34.86%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has higher upside potential than Worthington Steel, Inc., analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. is more attractive than Worthington Steel, Inc..

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.307, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.705%.

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Worthington Steel, Inc. pays 29.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Worthington Steel, Inc. quarterly revenues are $871.9M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s net income of $21.5M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.4M. Notably, Worthington Steel, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.61x while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worthington Steel, Inc. is 0.75x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.