WS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 5.84% compared to Worthington Steel's net margin of -5.3%. Worthington Steel's return on equity of 13.75% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -6.03%.

Worthington Steel has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17.3%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $14.40 which suggests that it could grow by 53.53%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Worthington Steel, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Worthington Steel.

Worthington Steel has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.926, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.634%.

Worthington Steel has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Worthington Steel pays 102.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Worthington Steel quarterly revenues are $911M, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Worthington Steel's net income of $53.2M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$242M. Notably, Worthington Steel's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.75x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 167.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worthington Steel is 0.51x versus 0.23x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 5.84% compared to Worthington Steel's net margin of -0.63%. Worthington Steel's return on equity of 13.75% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32%.

Worthington Steel has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17.3%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Worthington Steel has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Worthington Steel is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Worthington Steel has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.002%.

Worthington Steel has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Worthington Steel pays 102.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Worthington Steel's is not.

Worthington Steel quarterly revenues are $911M, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $106.8M. Worthington Steel's net income of $53.2M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K. Notably, Worthington Steel's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.75x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 14.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worthington Steel is 0.51x versus 0.25x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 5.84% compared to Worthington Steel's net margin of --. Worthington Steel's return on equity of 13.75% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Worthington Steel has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17.3%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 250.78%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Worthington Steel, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Worthington Steel.

Worthington Steel has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.854, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.435%.

Worthington Steel has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Worthington Steel pays 102.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Worthington Steel quarterly revenues are $911M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Worthington Steel's net income of $53.2M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Worthington Steel's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.75x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worthington Steel is 0.51x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 5.84% compared to Worthington Steel's net margin of --. Worthington Steel's return on equity of 13.75% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Worthington Steel has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17.3%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 145.9%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Worthington Steel, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Worthington Steel.

Worthington Steel has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.895, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.55%.

Worthington Steel has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Worthington Steel pays 102.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Worthington Steel quarterly revenues are $911M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Worthington Steel's net income of $53.2M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Worthington Steel's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.75x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worthington Steel is 0.51x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.