WS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum Co. has a net margin of 2.47% compared to Worthington Steel, Inc.'s net margin of -0.58%. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.64% beat Century Aluminum Co.'s return on equity of 3.2%.

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a consensus price target of $47.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.21%. On the other hand Century Aluminum Co. has an analysts' consensus of $63.33 which suggests that it could grow by 19.68%. Given that Worthington Steel, Inc. has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum Co., analysts believe Worthington Steel, Inc. is more attractive than Century Aluminum Co..

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum Co. has a beta of 2.167, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 116.713%.

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. Century Aluminum Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Worthington Steel, Inc. pays 29.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Worthington Steel, Inc. quarterly revenues are $871.9M, which are larger than Century Aluminum Co. quarterly revenues of $633.7M. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s net income of $21.5M is higher than Century Aluminum Co.'s net income of -$3.7M. Notably, Worthington Steel, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.83x while Century Aluminum Co.'s PE ratio is 133.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worthington Steel, Inc. is 0.60x versus 2.04x for Century Aluminum Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a net margin of 2.47% compared to Worthington Steel, Inc.'s net margin of -5.4%. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.64% beat Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s return on equity of -22.55%.

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a consensus price target of $47.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.21%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $13.41 which suggests that it could grow by 21.04%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has higher upside potential than Worthington Steel, Inc., analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. is more attractive than Worthington Steel, Inc..

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. has a beta of 1.988, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.829%.

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Worthington Steel, Inc. pays 29.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Worthington Steel, Inc. quarterly revenues are $871.9M, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s net income of $21.5M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s net income of -$233M. Notably, Worthington Steel, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.83x while Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.'s PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worthington Steel, Inc. is 0.60x versus 0.30x for Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a net margin of 2.47% compared to Worthington Steel, Inc.'s net margin of 3.04%. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.64% beat Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s return on equity of 14.39%.

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a consensus price target of $47.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.21%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $124.50 which suggests that it could fall by -6.09%. Given that Worthington Steel, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum Corp., analysts believe Worthington Steel, Inc. is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum Corp..

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a beta of 1.369, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.887%.

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. offers a yield of 2.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Worthington Steel, Inc. pays 29.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. pays out 45.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Worthington Steel, Inc. quarterly revenues are $871.9M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum Corp. quarterly revenues of $929M. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s net income of $21.5M is lower than Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s net income of $28.2M. Notably, Worthington Steel, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.83x while Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s PE ratio is 19.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worthington Steel, Inc. is 0.60x versus 0.65x for Kaiser Aluminum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Metallus, Inc. has a net margin of 2.47% compared to Worthington Steel, Inc.'s net margin of -5.35%. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.64% beat Metallus, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.17%.

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a consensus price target of $47.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.21%. On the other hand Metallus, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.51%. Given that Worthington Steel, Inc. has higher upside potential than Metallus, Inc., analysts believe Worthington Steel, Inc. is more attractive than Metallus, Inc..

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metallus, Inc. has a beta of 1.435, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.519%.

Worthington Steel, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. Metallus, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Worthington Steel, Inc. pays 29.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Metallus, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Worthington Steel, Inc. quarterly revenues are $871.9M, which are larger than Metallus, Inc. quarterly revenues of $267.3M. Worthington Steel, Inc.'s net income of $21.5M is higher than Metallus, Inc.'s net income of -$14.3M. Notably, Worthington Steel, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.83x while Metallus, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worthington Steel, Inc. is 0.60x versus 0.64x for Metallus, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.