KALU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of 2.78% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of 4.69%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 18.99%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $69.00, signalling upside risk potential of 1.95%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $23.00 which suggests that it could grow by 44.84%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.398, which suggesting that the stock is 39.799% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.697, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 169.68%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.55%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $777.4M, which are larger than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $633.9M. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $29.7M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.35x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 13.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.36x versus 0.65x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 2.78% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of -10.69%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $69.00, signalling upside risk potential of 1.95%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $10.51 which suggests that it could grow by 50.16%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.398, which suggesting that the stock is 39.799% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.452%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.55%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $777.4M, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.35x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.36x versus 0.18x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 2.78% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of 1.45%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41% beat Commercial Metals's return on equity of 1.76%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $69.00, signalling upside risk potential of 1.95%. On the other hand Commercial Metals has an analysts' consensus of $52.17 which suggests that it could grow by 13.18%. Given that Commercial Metals has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Commercial Metals is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.398, which suggesting that the stock is 39.799% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.238%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.55%. Commercial Metals offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals pays out 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kaiser Aluminum's is not.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $777.4M, which are smaller than Commercial Metals quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M is lower than Commercial Metals's net income of $25.5M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.35x while Commercial Metals's PE ratio is 76.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.36x versus 0.69x for Commercial Metals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 2.78% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of 4.97%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $69.00, signalling upside risk potential of 1.95%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $146.11 which suggests that it could grow by 11.96%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.398, which suggesting that the stock is 39.799% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.442, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.234%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.55%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kaiser Aluminum's is not.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $777.4M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.35x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 17.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.36x versus 1.17x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.