KALU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of 0.93% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of 7.16%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.06% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $79.67, signalling upside risk potential of 13.28%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $25.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.31%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.517% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.671, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 167.143%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $765.4M, which are larger than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $630.9M. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $7.1M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.51x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 6.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.38x versus 0.87x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 0.93% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of -10.34%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.06% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -10.21%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $79.67, signalling upside risk potential of 13.28%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.5%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.517% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.942, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.16%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $765.4M, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $7.1M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$447M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.51x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.38x versus 0.26x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 0.93% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of 5.35%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.06% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $79.67, signalling upside risk potential of 13.28%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $145.70 which suggests that it could grow by 14.6%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.517% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.336, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.606%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kaiser Aluminum's is not.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $765.4M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $7.1M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.51x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 12.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.38x versus 1.13x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Steel has a net margin of 0.93% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of -2.54%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.06% beat United States Steel's return on equity of 3.37%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $79.67, signalling upside risk potential of 13.28%. On the other hand United States Steel has an analysts' consensus of $40.94 which suggests that it could grow by 4.98%. Given that Kaiser Aluminum has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe Kaiser Aluminum is more attractive than United States Steel.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.517% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Steel has a beta of 1.862, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.249%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. United States Steel offers a yield of 0.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. United States Steel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $765.4M, which are smaller than United States Steel quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $7.1M is higher than United States Steel's net income of -$89M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.51x while United States Steel's PE ratio is 26.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.38x versus 0.63x for United States Steel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.