CSTM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum Co. has a net margin of 4.06% compared to Constellium SE's net margin of 1.68%. Constellium SE's return on equity of 13.75% beat Century Aluminum Co.'s return on equity of 10.05%.

Constellium SE has a consensus price target of $20.91, signalling upside risk potential of 9.1%. On the other hand Century Aluminum Co. has an analysts' consensus of $37.00 which suggests that it could fall by -0.51%. Given that Constellium SE has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum Co., analysts believe Constellium SE is more attractive than Century Aluminum Co..

Constellium SE has a beta of 1.551, which suggesting that the stock is 55.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum Co. has a beta of 2.285, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 128.528%.

Constellium SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Aluminum Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Constellium SE pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Constellium SE quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Century Aluminum Co. quarterly revenues of $632.2M. Constellium SE's net income of $88M is higher than Century Aluminum Co.'s net income of $10.6M. Notably, Constellium SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.86x while Century Aluminum Co.'s PE ratio is 48.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellium SE is 0.34x versus 1.51x for Century Aluminum Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fuse Group Holding has a net margin of 4.06% compared to Constellium SE's net margin of --. Constellium SE's return on equity of 13.75% beat Fuse Group Holding's return on equity of --.

Constellium SE has a consensus price target of $20.91, signalling upside risk potential of 9.1%. On the other hand Fuse Group Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Constellium SE has higher upside potential than Fuse Group Holding, analysts believe Constellium SE is more attractive than Fuse Group Holding.

Constellium SE has a beta of 1.551, which suggesting that the stock is 55.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuse Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Constellium SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fuse Group Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Constellium SE pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fuse Group Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Constellium SE quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Fuse Group Holding quarterly revenues of --. Constellium SE's net income of $88M is higher than Fuse Group Holding's net income of --. Notably, Constellium SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.86x while Fuse Group Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellium SE is 0.34x versus -- for Fuse Group Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a net margin of 4.06% compared to Constellium SE's net margin of 4.68%. Constellium SE's return on equity of 13.75% beat Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s return on equity of 12.44%.

Constellium SE has a consensus price target of $20.91, signalling upside risk potential of 9.1%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $106.50 which suggests that it could fall by -8.69%. Given that Constellium SE has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum Corp., analysts believe Constellium SE is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum Corp..

Constellium SE has a beta of 1.551, which suggesting that the stock is 55.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a beta of 1.511, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.066%.

Constellium SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. offers a yield of 2.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Constellium SE pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. pays out 107.4% of its earnings as a dividend.

Constellium SE quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Kaiser Aluminum Corp. quarterly revenues of $843.5M. Constellium SE's net income of $88M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s net income of $39.5M. Notably, Constellium SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.86x while Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellium SE is 0.34x versus 0.60x for Kaiser Aluminum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of 4.06% compared to Constellium SE's net margin of --. Constellium SE's return on equity of 13.75% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -34.36%.

Constellium SE has a consensus price target of $20.91, signalling upside risk potential of 9.1%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 44.07%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has higher upside potential than Constellium SE, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. is more attractive than Constellium SE.

Constellium SE has a beta of 1.551, which suggesting that the stock is 55.058% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.91%.

Constellium SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Constellium SE pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Constellium SE quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Constellium SE's net income of $88M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Constellium SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.86x while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellium SE is 0.34x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.