BSTO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

California-Engels Mining Co. has a net margin of -- compared to Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s net margin of -223.74%. Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat California-Engels Mining Co.'s return on equity of 1.62%.

Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand California-Engels Mining Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has higher upside potential than California-Engels Mining Co., analysts believe Blue Star Opportunities Corp. is more attractive than California-Engels Mining Co..

Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has a beta of -1.088, which suggesting that the stock is 208.848% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California-Engels Mining Co. has a beta of 0.250, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.998%.

Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. California-Engels Mining Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blue Star Opportunities Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. California-Engels Mining Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Star Opportunities Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than California-Engels Mining Co. quarterly revenues of $13.9K. Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s net income of -- is lower than California-Engels Mining Co.'s net income of -$31.1K. Notably, Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.68x while California-Engels Mining Co.'s PE ratio is 238.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Star Opportunities Corp. is 0.87x versus 35.96x for California-Engels Mining Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Century Aluminum Co. has a net margin of -- compared to Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s net margin of -0.58%. Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Century Aluminum Co.'s return on equity of 3.09%.

Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Century Aluminum Co. has an analysts' consensus of $66.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.48%. Given that Century Aluminum Co. has higher upside potential than Blue Star Opportunities Corp., analysts believe Century Aluminum Co. is more attractive than Blue Star Opportunities Corp..

Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has a beta of -1.088, which suggesting that the stock is 208.848% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum Co. has a beta of 1.995, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.454%.

Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Aluminum Co. offers a yield of 0.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blue Star Opportunities Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Star Opportunities Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Century Aluminum Co. quarterly revenues of $633.7M. Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s net income of -- is lower than Century Aluminum Co.'s net income of -$3.7M. Notably, Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.68x while Century Aluminum Co.'s PE ratio is 155.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Star Opportunities Corp. is 0.87x versus 2.38x for Century Aluminum Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s net margin of 3.04%. Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s return on equity of 14.39%.

Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $124.50 which suggests that it could fall by -5.41%. Given that Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has higher upside potential than Blue Star Opportunities Corp., analysts believe Kaiser Aluminum Corp. is more attractive than Blue Star Opportunities Corp..

Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has a beta of -1.088, which suggesting that the stock is 208.848% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a beta of 1.395, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.459%.

Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. offers a yield of 2.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Blue Star Opportunities Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. pays out 45.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blue Star Opportunities Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum Corp. quarterly revenues of $929M. Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s net income of -- is lower than Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s net income of $28.2M. Notably, Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.68x while Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s PE ratio is 19.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Star Opportunities Corp. is 0.87x versus 0.65x for Kaiser Aluminum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s net margin of --. Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -43.51%.

Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $3.25 which suggests that it could grow by 88.95%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has higher upside potential than Blue Star Opportunities Corp., analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. is more attractive than Blue Star Opportunities Corp..

Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has a beta of -1.088, which suggesting that the stock is 208.848% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.434, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.383%.

Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blue Star Opportunities Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Star Opportunities Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s net income of -- is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.4M. Notably, Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.68x while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Star Opportunities Corp. is 0.87x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.