GLGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -10.24% compared to Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net margin of 1.45%. Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.22% beat Friedman Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.53%.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Friedman Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Greystone Logistics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, Inc., analysts believe Greystone Logistics, Inc. is more attractive than Friedman Industries, Inc..

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.127, which suggesting that the stock is 87.292% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.552, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.197%.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Friedman Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Greystone Logistics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries, Inc. pays out 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $10.7M, which are smaller than Friedman Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $152.4M. Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M is lower than Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net income of $2.2M. Notably, Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.58x while Friedman Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greystone Logistics, Inc. is 0.30x versus 0.28x for Friedman Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a net margin of -10.24% compared to Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net margin of 4.68%. Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.22% beat Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s return on equity of 12.44%.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $106.50 which suggests that it could fall by -8.87%. Given that Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has higher upside potential than Greystone Logistics, Inc., analysts believe Kaiser Aluminum Corp. is more attractive than Greystone Logistics, Inc..

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.127, which suggesting that the stock is 87.292% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a beta of 1.511, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.066%.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. offers a yield of 2.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Greystone Logistics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. pays out 107.4% of its earnings as a dividend.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $10.7M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum Corp. quarterly revenues of $843.5M. Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M is lower than Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s net income of $39.5M. Notably, Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.58x while Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greystone Logistics, Inc. is 0.30x versus 0.60x for Kaiser Aluminum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of -10.24% compared to Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net margin of --. Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.22% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -34.36%.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 44.07%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has higher upside potential than Greystone Logistics, Inc., analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. is more attractive than Greystone Logistics, Inc..

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.127, which suggesting that the stock is 87.292% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.91%.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greystone Logistics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $10.7M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.58x while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greystone Logistics, Inc. is 0.30x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources Corp. has a net margin of -10.24% compared to Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net margin of --. Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.22% beat Solitario Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -20.59%.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Solitario Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 134.56%. Given that Solitario Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than Greystone Logistics, Inc., analysts believe Solitario Resources Corp. is more attractive than Greystone Logistics, Inc..

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.127, which suggesting that the stock is 87.292% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.966%.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greystone Logistics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $10.7M, which are larger than Solitario Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M is higher than Solitario Resources Corp.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.58x while Solitario Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greystone Logistics, Inc. is 0.30x versus -- for Solitario Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.