GLGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. has a net margin of -10.24% compared to Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net margin of 8.54%. Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.22% beat Axalta Coating Systems Ltd.'s return on equity of 21.38%.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $36.80 which suggests that it could grow by 25.77%. Given that Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. has higher upside potential than Greystone Logistics, Inc., analysts believe Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. is more attractive than Greystone Logistics, Inc..

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.127, which suggesting that the stock is 87.292% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. has a beta of 1.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.315%.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greystone Logistics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $10.7M, which are smaller than Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M is lower than Axalta Coating Systems Ltd.'s net income of $110M. Notably, Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.71x while Axalta Coating Systems Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greystone Logistics, Inc. is 0.29x versus 1.24x for Axalta Coating Systems Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Core Molding Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -10.24% compared to Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net margin of 3.21%. Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.22% beat Core Molding Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.35%.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Core Molding Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.4%. Given that Core Molding Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Greystone Logistics, Inc., analysts believe Core Molding Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Greystone Logistics, Inc..

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.127, which suggesting that the stock is 87.292% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Molding Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.520, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.05%.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Core Molding Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greystone Logistics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Core Molding Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $10.7M, which are smaller than Core Molding Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $58.4M. Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M is lower than Core Molding Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $1.9M. Notably, Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.71x while Core Molding Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greystone Logistics, Inc. is 0.29x versus 0.62x for Core Molding Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Eastman Chemical Co. has a net margin of -10.24% compared to Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net margin of 2.13%. Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.22% beat Eastman Chemical Co.'s return on equity of 11.97%.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eastman Chemical Co. has an analysts' consensus of $72.76 which suggests that it could grow by 19.96%. Given that Eastman Chemical Co. has higher upside potential than Greystone Logistics, Inc., analysts believe Eastman Chemical Co. is more attractive than Greystone Logistics, Inc..

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.127, which suggesting that the stock is 87.292% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eastman Chemical Co. has a beta of 1.241, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.114%.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Eastman Chemical Co. offers a yield of 5.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Greystone Logistics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eastman Chemical Co. pays out 42.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Eastman Chemical Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $10.7M, which are smaller than Eastman Chemical Co. quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M is lower than Eastman Chemical Co.'s net income of $47M. Notably, Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.71x while Eastman Chemical Co.'s PE ratio is 10.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greystone Logistics, Inc. is 0.29x versus 0.78x for Eastman Chemical Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Westwater Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -10.24% compared to Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net margin of --. Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.22% beat Westwater Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.27%.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Westwater Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.75 which suggests that it could grow by 96.34%. Given that Westwater Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Greystone Logistics, Inc., analysts believe Westwater Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Greystone Logistics, Inc..

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.127, which suggesting that the stock is 87.292% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Westwater Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.388, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.849%.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Westwater Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greystone Logistics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Westwater Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $10.7M, which are larger than Westwater Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M is higher than Westwater Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$9.8M. Notably, Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.71x while Westwater Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greystone Logistics, Inc. is 0.29x versus 8.73x for Westwater Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.