GLGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has a net margin of -26.57% compared to Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net margin of --. Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.67% beat Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Greystone Logistics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Blue Star Opportunities Corp., analysts believe Greystone Logistics, Inc. is more attractive than Blue Star Opportunities Corp..

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 89.451% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Star Opportunities Corp. has a beta of -0.473, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 147.266%.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Blue Star Opportunities Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greystone Logistics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Star Opportunities Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.8M, which are larger than Blue Star Opportunities Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M is higher than Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.88x while Blue Star Opportunities Corp.'s PE ratio is 18.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greystone Logistics, Inc. is 0.18x versus 0.46x for Blue Star Opportunities Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Century Aluminum Co. has a net margin of -26.57% compared to Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net margin of -0.58%. Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.67% beat Century Aluminum Co.'s return on equity of 3.2%.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Century Aluminum Co. has an analysts' consensus of $62.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.78%. Given that Century Aluminum Co. has higher upside potential than Greystone Logistics, Inc., analysts believe Century Aluminum Co. is more attractive than Greystone Logistics, Inc..

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 89.451% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum Co. has a beta of 2.237, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.674%.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Aluminum Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greystone Logistics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.8M, which are smaller than Century Aluminum Co. quarterly revenues of $633.7M. Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M is higher than Century Aluminum Co.'s net income of -$3.7M. Notably, Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.88x while Century Aluminum Co.'s PE ratio is 133.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greystone Logistics, Inc. is 0.18x versus 2.03x for Century Aluminum Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Eastman Chemical Co. has a net margin of -26.57% compared to Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net margin of 5.31%. Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.67% beat Eastman Chemical Co.'s return on equity of 8.03%.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eastman Chemical Co. has an analysts' consensus of $76.56 which suggests that it could fall by -3.28%. Given that Eastman Chemical Co. has higher upside potential than Greystone Logistics, Inc., analysts believe Eastman Chemical Co. is more attractive than Greystone Logistics, Inc..

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 89.451% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eastman Chemical Co. has a beta of 1.237, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.698%.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Eastman Chemical Co. offers a yield of 4.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share. Greystone Logistics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eastman Chemical Co. pays out 81.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Eastman Chemical Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.8M, which are smaller than Eastman Chemical Co. quarterly revenues of $2B. Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M is lower than Eastman Chemical Co.'s net income of $105M. Notably, Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.88x while Eastman Chemical Co.'s PE ratio is 19.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greystone Logistics, Inc. is 0.18x versus 1.05x for Eastman Chemical Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a net margin of -26.57% compared to Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net margin of 3.04%. Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.67% beat Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s return on equity of 14.39%.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $124.50 which suggests that it could fall by -5.83%. Given that Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has higher upside potential than Greystone Logistics, Inc., analysts believe Kaiser Aluminum Corp. is more attractive than Greystone Logistics, Inc..

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a beta of 0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 89.451% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a beta of 1.421, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.06%.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Greystone Logistics, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. pays out 45.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greystone Logistics, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.8M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum Corp. quarterly revenues of $929M. Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s net income of -$2.1M is lower than Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s net income of $28.2M. Notably, Greystone Logistics, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.88x while Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s PE ratio is 19.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greystone Logistics, Inc. is 0.18x versus 0.63x for Kaiser Aluminum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.