SVTMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has a net margin of 20.14% compared to SM Investments Corp.'s net margin of -13.87%. SM Investments Corp.'s return on equity of 13.44% beat Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s return on equity of -1.43%.

SM Investments Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SM Investments Corp. has higher upside potential than Bloomberry Resorts Corp., analysts believe SM Investments Corp. is more attractive than Bloomberry Resorts Corp..

SM Investments Corp. has a beta of 0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 89.451% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has a beta of -0.352, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 135.205%.

SM Investments Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. Bloomberry Resorts Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SM Investments Corp. pays 16.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Bloomberry Resorts Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SM Investments Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SM Investments Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Bloomberry Resorts Corp. quarterly revenues of $220.7M. SM Investments Corp.'s net income of $525.4M is higher than Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s net income of -$30.6M. Notably, SM Investments Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.73x while Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Investments Corp. is 1.35x versus 0.16x for Bloomberry Resorts Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jollibee Foods Corp. has a net margin of 20.14% compared to SM Investments Corp.'s net margin of 4.06%. SM Investments Corp.'s return on equity of 13.44% beat Jollibee Foods Corp.'s return on equity of 14.25%.

SM Investments Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Jollibee Foods Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SM Investments Corp. has higher upside potential than Jollibee Foods Corp., analysts believe SM Investments Corp. is more attractive than Jollibee Foods Corp..

SM Investments Corp. has a beta of 0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 89.451% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jollibee Foods Corp. has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.543%.

SM Investments Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. Jollibee Foods Corp. offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. SM Investments Corp. pays 16.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Jollibee Foods Corp. pays out 19.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SM Investments Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Jollibee Foods Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. SM Investments Corp.'s net income of $525.4M is higher than Jollibee Foods Corp.'s net income of $54.3M. Notably, SM Investments Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.73x while Jollibee Foods Corp.'s PE ratio is 19.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Investments Corp. is 1.35x versus 0.67x for Jollibee Foods Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a net margin of 20.14% compared to SM Investments Corp.'s net margin of 3.43%. SM Investments Corp.'s return on equity of 13.44% beat Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.12%.

SM Investments Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Puregold Price Club, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SM Investments Corp. has higher upside potential than Puregold Price Club, Inc., analysts believe SM Investments Corp. is more attractive than Puregold Price Club, Inc..

SM Investments Corp. has a beta of 0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 89.451% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a beta of 0.153, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.679%.

SM Investments Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. Puregold Price Club, Inc. offers a yield of 4.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. SM Investments Corp. pays 16.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Puregold Price Club, Inc. pays out 49.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SM Investments Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Puregold Price Club, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1B. SM Investments Corp.'s net income of $525.4M is higher than Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s net income of $35M. Notably, SM Investments Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.73x while Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Investments Corp. is 1.35x versus 0.49x for Puregold Price Club, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 20.14% compared to SM Investments Corp.'s net margin of 2.01%. SM Investments Corp.'s return on equity of 13.44% beat Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.13%.

SM Investments Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SM Investments Corp. has higher upside potential than Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc., analysts believe SM Investments Corp. is more attractive than Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc..

SM Investments Corp. has a beta of 0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 89.451% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.863, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.662%.

SM Investments Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 6.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. SM Investments Corp. pays 16.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. pays out 15.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SM Investments Corp. quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $889.6M. SM Investments Corp.'s net income of $525.4M is higher than Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $17.9M. Notably, SM Investments Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.73x while Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Investments Corp. is 1.35x versus 0.19x for Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.