RRETY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has a net margin of 2.01% compared to Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -13.87%. Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.13% beat Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s return on equity of -1.43%.

Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bloomberry Resorts Corp., analysts believe Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Bloomberry Resorts Corp..

Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.945% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has a beta of -0.321, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 132.06%.

Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.28%. Bloomberry Resorts Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. pays 15.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Bloomberry Resorts Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $889.6M, which are larger than Bloomberry Resorts Corp. quarterly revenues of $220.7M. Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $17.9M is higher than Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s net income of -$30.6M. Notably, Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.48x while Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. is 0.20x versus 0.52x for Bloomberry Resorts Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jollibee Foods Corp. has a net margin of 2.01% compared to Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 4.06%. Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.13% beat Jollibee Foods Corp.'s return on equity of 14.25%.

Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Jollibee Foods Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Jollibee Foods Corp., analysts believe Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Jollibee Foods Corp..

Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.945% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jollibee Foods Corp. has a beta of 0.697, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.266%.

Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.28%. Jollibee Foods Corp. offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. pays 15.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Jollibee Foods Corp. pays out 19.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $889.6M, which are smaller than Jollibee Foods Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $17.9M is lower than Jollibee Foods Corp.'s net income of $54.3M. Notably, Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.48x while Jollibee Foods Corp.'s PE ratio is 22.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. is 0.20x versus 0.78x for Jollibee Foods Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a net margin of 2.01% compared to Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 3.43%. Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.13% beat Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.12%.

Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Puregold Price Club, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Puregold Price Club, Inc., analysts believe Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Puregold Price Club, Inc..

Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.945% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a beta of 0.094, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.631%.

Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.28%. Puregold Price Club, Inc. offers a yield of 5.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. pays 15.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Puregold Price Club, Inc. pays out 49.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $889.6M, which are smaller than Puregold Price Club, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1B. Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $17.9M is lower than Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s net income of $35M. Notably, Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.48x while Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. is 0.20x versus 0.47x for Puregold Price Club, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SM Investments Corp. has a net margin of 2.01% compared to Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 20.14%. Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.13% beat SM Investments Corp.'s return on equity of 13.44%.

Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SM Investments Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than SM Investments Corp., analysts believe Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than SM Investments Corp..

Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.945% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Investments Corp. has a beta of 0.118, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.23%.

Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.28%. SM Investments Corp. offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. pays 15.98% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Investments Corp. pays out 16.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $889.6M, which are smaller than SM Investments Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $17.9M is lower than SM Investments Corp.'s net income of $525.4M. Notably, Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.48x while SM Investments Corp.'s PE ratio is 8.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. is 0.20x versus 1.24x for SM Investments Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.