PGCMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has a net margin of 3.43% compared to Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s net margin of -13.87%. Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.12% beat Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s return on equity of -1.43%.

Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Puregold Price Club, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bloomberry Resorts Corp., analysts believe Puregold Price Club, Inc. is more attractive than Bloomberry Resorts Corp..

Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a beta of 0.094, which suggesting that the stock is 90.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has a beta of -0.321, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 132.06%.

Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.14%. Bloomberry Resorts Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Puregold Price Club, Inc. pays 49.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Bloomberry Resorts Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Puregold Price Club, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Bloomberry Resorts Corp. quarterly revenues of $220.7M. Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s net income of $35M is higher than Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s net income of -$30.6M. Notably, Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.21x while Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Puregold Price Club, Inc. is 0.47x versus 0.52x for Bloomberry Resorts Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jollibee Foods Corp. has a net margin of 3.43% compared to Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s net margin of 4.06%. Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.12% beat Jollibee Foods Corp.'s return on equity of 14.25%.

Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Jollibee Foods Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Puregold Price Club, Inc. has higher upside potential than Jollibee Foods Corp., analysts believe Puregold Price Club, Inc. is more attractive than Jollibee Foods Corp..

Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a beta of 0.094, which suggesting that the stock is 90.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jollibee Foods Corp. has a beta of 0.697, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.266%.

Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.14%. Jollibee Foods Corp. offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Puregold Price Club, Inc. pays 49.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Jollibee Foods Corp. pays out 19.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Puregold Price Club, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Jollibee Foods Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s net income of $35M is lower than Jollibee Foods Corp.'s net income of $54.3M. Notably, Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.21x while Jollibee Foods Corp.'s PE ratio is 22.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Puregold Price Club, Inc. is 0.47x versus 0.78x for Jollibee Foods Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 3.43% compared to Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s net margin of 2.01%. Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.12% beat Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.13%.

Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Puregold Price Club, Inc. has higher upside potential than Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Puregold Price Club, Inc. is more attractive than Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc..

Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a beta of 0.094, which suggesting that the stock is 90.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.945%.

Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.14%. Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 6.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Puregold Price Club, Inc. pays 49.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. pays out 15.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Puregold Price Club, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $889.6M. Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s net income of $35M is higher than Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $17.9M. Notably, Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.21x while Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Puregold Price Club, Inc. is 0.47x versus 0.20x for Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SM Investments Corp. has a net margin of 3.43% compared to Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s net margin of 20.14%. Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.12% beat SM Investments Corp.'s return on equity of 13.44%.

Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SM Investments Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Puregold Price Club, Inc. has higher upside potential than SM Investments Corp., analysts believe Puregold Price Club, Inc. is more attractive than SM Investments Corp..

Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a beta of 0.094, which suggesting that the stock is 90.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Investments Corp. has a beta of 0.118, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.23%.

Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.14%. SM Investments Corp. offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Puregold Price Club, Inc. pays 49.75% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Investments Corp. pays out 16.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Puregold Price Club, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than SM Investments Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s net income of $35M is lower than SM Investments Corp.'s net income of $525.4M. Notably, Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.21x while SM Investments Corp.'s PE ratio is 8.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Puregold Price Club, Inc. is 0.47x versus 1.24x for SM Investments Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.