ABG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Carvana Co. has a net margin of 3.06% compared to Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.'s net margin of 4.66%. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.46% beat Carvana Co.'s return on equity of 64.87%.

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $255.63, signalling upside risk potential of 5.87%. On the other hand Carvana Co. has an analysts' consensus of $446.43 which suggests that it could grow by 1.82%. Given that Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Carvana Co., analysts believe Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. is more attractive than Carvana Co..

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.879, which suggesting that the stock is 12.071% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Carvana Co. has a beta of 3.513, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 251.313%.

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Carvana Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carvana Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are smaller than Carvana Co. quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.'s net income of $147.1M is lower than Carvana Co.'s net income of $263M. Notably, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.47x while Carvana Co.'s PE ratio is 99.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. is 0.27x versus 3.43x for Carvana Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lithia Motors, Inc. has a net margin of 3.06% compared to Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.'s net margin of 2.26%. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.46% beat Lithia Motors, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.35%.

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $255.63, signalling upside risk potential of 5.87%. On the other hand Lithia Motors, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $394.79 which suggests that it could grow by 14.63%. Given that Lithia Motors, Inc. has higher upside potential than Asbury Automotive Group, Inc., analysts believe Lithia Motors, Inc. is more attractive than Asbury Automotive Group, Inc..

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.879, which suggesting that the stock is 12.071% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lithia Motors, Inc. has a beta of 1.182, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.244%.

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lithia Motors, Inc. offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lithia Motors, Inc. pays out 7.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Lithia Motors, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are smaller than Lithia Motors, Inc. quarterly revenues of $9.7B. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.'s net income of $147.1M is lower than Lithia Motors, Inc.'s net income of $218.6M. Notably, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.47x while Lithia Motors, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. is 0.27x versus 0.24x for Lithia Motors, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Penske Automotive Group, Inc. has a net margin of 3.06% compared to Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.'s net margin of 2.77%. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.46% beat Penske Automotive Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.38%.

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $255.63, signalling upside risk potential of 5.87%. On the other hand Penske Automotive Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $180.89 which suggests that it could grow by 9.23%. Given that Penske Automotive Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Asbury Automotive Group, Inc., analysts believe Penske Automotive Group, Inc. is more attractive than Asbury Automotive Group, Inc..

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.879, which suggesting that the stock is 12.071% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Penske Automotive Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.923, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.653%.

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Penske Automotive Group, Inc. offers a yield of 3.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.38 per share. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Penske Automotive Group, Inc. pays out 29.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Penske Automotive Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are smaller than Penske Automotive Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.'s net income of $147.1M is lower than Penske Automotive Group, Inc.'s net income of $213.5M. Notably, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.47x while Penske Automotive Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. is 0.27x versus 0.36x for Penske Automotive Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sonic Automotive, Inc. has a net margin of 3.06% compared to Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.'s net margin of 1.18%. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.46% beat Sonic Automotive, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.38%.

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $255.63, signalling upside risk potential of 5.87%. On the other hand Sonic Automotive, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $78.10 which suggests that it could grow by 21.46%. Given that Sonic Automotive, Inc. has higher upside potential than Asbury Automotive Group, Inc., analysts believe Sonic Automotive, Inc. is more attractive than Asbury Automotive Group, Inc..

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.879, which suggesting that the stock is 12.071% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sonic Automotive, Inc. has a beta of 0.900, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.956%.

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sonic Automotive, Inc. offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sonic Automotive, Inc. pays out 20.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Sonic Automotive, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Sonic Automotive, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4B. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.'s net income of $147.1M is higher than Sonic Automotive, Inc.'s net income of $46.8M. Notably, Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.47x while Sonic Automotive, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. is 0.27x versus 0.15x for Sonic Automotive, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.