CVNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AutoNation, Inc. has a net margin of 4.66% compared to Carvana Co.'s net margin of 3.06%. Carvana Co.'s return on equity of 64.87% beat AutoNation, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.15%.

Carvana Co. has a consensus price target of $446.22, signalling downside risk potential of -1.86%. On the other hand AutoNation, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $238.10 which suggests that it could grow by 13.86%. Given that AutoNation, Inc. has higher upside potential than Carvana Co., analysts believe AutoNation, Inc. is more attractive than Carvana Co..

Carvana Co. has a beta of 3.513, which suggesting that the stock is 251.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AutoNation, Inc. has a beta of 0.893, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.739%.

Carvana Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AutoNation, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carvana Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AutoNation, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carvana Co. quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are smaller than AutoNation, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7B. Carvana Co.'s net income of $263M is higher than AutoNation, Inc.'s net income of $215.1M. Notably, Carvana Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 102.56x while AutoNation, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carvana Co. is 3.52x versus 0.29x for AutoNation, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarMax, Inc. has a net margin of 4.66% compared to Carvana Co.'s net margin of 1.07%. Carvana Co.'s return on equity of 64.87% beat CarMax, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.38%.

Carvana Co. has a consensus price target of $446.22, signalling downside risk potential of -1.86%. On the other hand CarMax, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $38.31 which suggests that it could fall by -0.42%. Given that Carvana Co. has more downside risk than CarMax, Inc., analysts believe CarMax, Inc. is more attractive than Carvana Co..

Carvana Co. has a beta of 3.513, which suggesting that the stock is 251.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarMax, Inc. has a beta of 1.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.25%.

Carvana Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarMax, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carvana Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CarMax, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carvana Co. quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are smaller than CarMax, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5.8B. Carvana Co.'s net income of $263M is higher than CarMax, Inc.'s net income of $62.2M. Notably, Carvana Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 102.56x while CarMax, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carvana Co. is 3.52x versus 0.22x for CarMax, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mohawk Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 4.66% compared to Carvana Co.'s net margin of 3.95%. Carvana Co.'s return on equity of 64.87% beat Mohawk Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.28%.

Carvana Co. has a consensus price target of $446.22, signalling downside risk potential of -1.86%. On the other hand Mohawk Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $136.10 which suggests that it could grow by 26.16%. Given that Mohawk Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Carvana Co., analysts believe Mohawk Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Carvana Co..

Carvana Co. has a beta of 3.513, which suggesting that the stock is 251.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mohawk Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.233, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.255%.

Carvana Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mohawk Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carvana Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mohawk Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carvana Co. quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Mohawk Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Carvana Co.'s net income of $263M is higher than Mohawk Industries, Inc.'s net income of $108.8M. Notably, Carvana Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 102.56x while Mohawk Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carvana Co. is 3.52x versus 0.63x for Mohawk Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of 4.66% compared to Carvana Co.'s net margin of 4.94%. Carvana Co.'s return on equity of 64.87% beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.04%.

Carvana Co. has a consensus price target of $446.22, signalling downside risk potential of -1.86%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $397.43 which suggests that it could fall by -17.61%. Given that Tesla, Inc. has more downside risk than Carvana Co., analysts believe Carvana Co. is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

Carvana Co. has a beta of 3.513, which suggesting that the stock is 251.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.874, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.392%.

Carvana Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carvana Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carvana Co. quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $28.1B. Carvana Co.'s net income of $263M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $1.4B. Notably, Carvana Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 102.56x while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 321.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carvana Co. is 3.52x versus 17.72x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.