CVNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CarGurus has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Carvana's net margin of 20.08%. Carvana's return on equity of 97.13% beat CarGurus's return on equity of 3.94%.

Carvana has a consensus price target of $265.56, signalling upside risk potential of 29.91%. On the other hand CarGurus has an analysts' consensus of $40.04 which suggests that it could grow by 38.94%. Given that CarGurus has higher upside potential than Carvana, analysts believe CarGurus is more attractive than Carvana.

Carvana has a beta of 3.564, which suggesting that the stock is 256.418% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarGurus has a beta of 1.524, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.421%.

Carvana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CarGurus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carvana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CarGurus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carvana quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than CarGurus quarterly revenues of $228.5M. Carvana's net income of $79M is higher than CarGurus's net income of $45.9M. Notably, Carvana's price-to-earnings ratio is 130.20x while CarGurus's PE ratio is 160.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carvana is 2.30x versus 3.45x for CarGurus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Carvana's net margin of -42.85%. Carvana's return on equity of 97.13% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -65.03%.

Carvana has a consensus price target of $265.56, signalling upside risk potential of 29.91%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.67 which suggests that it could grow by 18.19%. Given that Carvana has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Carvana is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Carvana has a beta of 3.564, which suggesting that the stock is 256.418% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Carvana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carvana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carvana quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Carvana's net income of $79M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$743M. Notably, Carvana's price-to-earnings ratio is 130.20x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carvana is 2.30x versus 2.53x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Carvana's net margin of 9.17%. Carvana's return on equity of 97.13% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

Carvana has a consensus price target of $265.56, signalling upside risk potential of 29.91%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $330.38 which suggests that it could grow by 25.36%. Given that Carvana has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Carvana is more attractive than Tesla.

Carvana has a beta of 3.564, which suggesting that the stock is 256.418% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.504, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.394%.

Carvana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carvana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carvana quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Carvana's net income of $79M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Carvana's price-to-earnings ratio is 130.20x while Tesla's PE ratio is 129.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carvana is 2.30x versus 9.43x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wayfair has a net margin of 2.23% compared to Carvana's net margin of -4.1%. Carvana's return on equity of 97.13% beat Wayfair's return on equity of --.

Carvana has a consensus price target of $265.56, signalling upside risk potential of 29.91%. On the other hand Wayfair has an analysts' consensus of $54.79 which suggests that it could grow by 61.85%. Given that Wayfair has higher upside potential than Carvana, analysts believe Wayfair is more attractive than Carvana.

Carvana has a beta of 3.564, which suggesting that the stock is 256.418% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wayfair has a beta of 3.444, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 244.36%.

Carvana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wayfair offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carvana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wayfair pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Carvana quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Wayfair quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Carvana's net income of $79M is higher than Wayfair's net income of -$128M. Notably, Carvana's price-to-earnings ratio is 130.20x while Wayfair's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carvana is 2.30x versus 0.35x for Wayfair. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.