BLBRF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jollibee Foods Corp. has a net margin of -13.87% compared to Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s net margin of 4.06%. Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s return on equity of -1.43% beat Jollibee Foods Corp.'s return on equity of 14.25%.

Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Jollibee Foods Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has higher upside potential than Jollibee Foods Corp., analysts believe Bloomberry Resorts Corp. is more attractive than Jollibee Foods Corp..

Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has a beta of -0.321, which suggesting that the stock is 132.06% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jollibee Foods Corp. has a beta of 0.697, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.266%.

Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jollibee Foods Corp. offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Bloomberry Resorts Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jollibee Foods Corp. pays out 19.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Jollibee Foods Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bloomberry Resorts Corp. quarterly revenues are $220.7M, which are smaller than Jollibee Foods Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s net income of -$30.6M is lower than Jollibee Foods Corp.'s net income of $54.3M. Notably, Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.89x while Jollibee Foods Corp.'s PE ratio is 22.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloomberry Resorts Corp. is 0.52x versus 0.78x for Jollibee Foods Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a net margin of -13.87% compared to Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s net margin of 3.43%. Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s return on equity of -1.43% beat Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.12%.

Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Puregold Price Club, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has higher upside potential than Puregold Price Club, Inc., analysts believe Bloomberry Resorts Corp. is more attractive than Puregold Price Club, Inc..

Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has a beta of -0.321, which suggesting that the stock is 132.06% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a beta of 0.094, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.631%.

Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Puregold Price Club, Inc. offers a yield of 5.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Bloomberry Resorts Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Puregold Price Club, Inc. pays out 49.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bloomberry Resorts Corp. quarterly revenues are $220.7M, which are smaller than Puregold Price Club, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1B. Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s net income of -$30.6M is lower than Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s net income of $35M. Notably, Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.89x while Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloomberry Resorts Corp. is 0.52x versus 0.47x for Puregold Price Club, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -13.87% compared to Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s net margin of 2.01%. Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s return on equity of -1.43% beat Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.13%.

Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has higher upside potential than Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Bloomberry Resorts Corp. is more attractive than Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc..

Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has a beta of -0.321, which suggesting that the stock is 132.06% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.945%.

Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 6.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Bloomberry Resorts Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. pays out 15.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bloomberry Resorts Corp. quarterly revenues are $220.7M, which are smaller than Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $889.6M. Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s net income of -$30.6M is lower than Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $17.9M. Notably, Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.89x while Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloomberry Resorts Corp. is 0.52x versus 0.20x for Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SM Investments Corp. has a net margin of -13.87% compared to Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s net margin of 20.14%. Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s return on equity of -1.43% beat SM Investments Corp.'s return on equity of 13.44%.

Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SM Investments Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has higher upside potential than SM Investments Corp., analysts believe Bloomberry Resorts Corp. is more attractive than SM Investments Corp..

Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has a beta of -0.321, which suggesting that the stock is 132.06% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Investments Corp. has a beta of 0.118, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.23%.

Bloomberry Resorts Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SM Investments Corp. offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Bloomberry Resorts Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SM Investments Corp. pays out 16.27% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Investments Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bloomberry Resorts Corp. quarterly revenues are $220.7M, which are smaller than SM Investments Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s net income of -$30.6M is lower than SM Investments Corp.'s net income of $525.4M. Notably, Bloomberry Resorts Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.89x while SM Investments Corp.'s PE ratio is 8.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bloomberry Resorts Corp. is 0.52x versus 1.24x for SM Investments Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.