Financhill
Buy
54

SNWGF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$12.19
Seasonality move :
19.63%
Day range:
$11.29 - $11.98
52-week range:
$3.40 - $12.36
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
60,311.82x
P/B ratio:
21.86x
Volume:
227K
Avg. volume:
189.1K
1-year change:
215.26%
Market cap:
$2B
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.21

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
SNWGF
Snowline Gold Corp.
-- -- -- -- --
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
-- -- -- -- --
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
$4M -$0.01 1.34% -100% $4.83
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
$64.5M $0.28 106.58% -- $22.20
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
-- -$0.03 -- -91.18% $47.03
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
$60.6M -- -51.92% -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
SNWGF
Snowline Gold Corp.
$11.73 -- $2B -- $0.00 0% 60,311.82x
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
$1.90 -- $26M -- $0.00 0% --
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
$4.08 $4.83 $805.8M -- $0.01 0% 48.09x
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
$19.35 $22.20 $1.1B 3.42x $0.00 0% 6.23x
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
$29.30 $47.03 $3.1B 250.29x $0.00 0% --
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
$0.2500 -- $16.9M 2.02x $0.00 0% 0.06x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
SNWGF
Snowline Gold Corp.
0.19% -1.745 0.01% 7.72x
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
-- 1.703 -- 43.32x
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
8.34% 1.760 7.69% 1.57x
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
20.73% 1.903 13.71% 1.33x
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
35.61% 1.696 16.75% 2.67x
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
28.31% 172.414 51.97% 0.37x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
SNWGF
Snowline Gold Corp.
-$221.8K -$26.9M -67.06% -67.18% -- -$22.5M
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
-$700 -$313.5K -19.82% -19.82% -- -$934.5K
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
$2.8M $572K -1.05% -1.15% 13.79% $1.3M
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
$102K -$7.6M -2.04% -2.43% -15.09% -$5.6M
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
-$42.1K -$3.4M -3.35% -5.31% -- -$40.1M
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
$6.7M $4.2M 1.83% 2.62% -8.2% $13.4M

Snowline Gold Corp. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns SNWGF or AUST?

    Austin Gold Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Snowline Gold Corp.'s net margin of --. Snowline Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -67.18% beat Austin Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -19.82%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SNWGF
    Snowline Gold Corp.
    -- -$0.13 $93M
    AUST
    Austin Gold Corp.
    -- -$0.02 $8.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About SNWGF or AUST?

    Snowline Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Austin Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 58%. Given that Austin Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Snowline Gold Corp., analysts believe Austin Gold Corp. is more attractive than Snowline Gold Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SNWGF
    Snowline Gold Corp.
    0 0 0
    AUST
    Austin Gold Corp.
    0 0 0
  • Is SNWGF or AUST More Risky?

    Snowline Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Austin Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNWGF or AUST?

    Snowline Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Austin Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Snowline Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Austin Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SNWGF or AUST?

    Snowline Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Austin Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Snowline Gold Corp.'s net income of -$21.4M is lower than Austin Gold Corp.'s net income of -$270.8K. Notably, Snowline Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Austin Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snowline Gold Corp. is 60,311.82x versus -- for Austin Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SNWGF
    Snowline Gold Corp.
    60,311.82x -- -- -$21.4M
    AUST
    Austin Gold Corp.
    -- -- -- -$270.8K
  • Which has Higher Returns SNWGF or GROY?

    Gold Royalty Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Snowline Gold Corp.'s net margin of -27.31%. Snowline Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -67.18% beat Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SNWGF
    Snowline Gold Corp.
    -- -$0.13 $93M
    GROY
    Gold Royalty Corp.
    68.47% -$0.01 $610.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About SNWGF or GROY?

    Snowline Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gold Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $4.83 which suggests that it could grow by 18.46%. Given that Gold Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than Snowline Gold Corp., analysts believe Gold Royalty Corp. is more attractive than Snowline Gold Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SNWGF
    Snowline Gold Corp.
    0 0 0
    GROY
    Gold Royalty Corp.
    2 0 0
  • Is SNWGF or GROY More Risky?

    Snowline Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNWGF or GROY?

    Snowline Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Snowline Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SNWGF or GROY?

    Snowline Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. Snowline Gold Corp.'s net income of -$21.4M is lower than Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Snowline Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snowline Gold Corp. is 60,311.82x versus 48.09x for Gold Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SNWGF
    Snowline Gold Corp.
    60,311.82x -- -- -$21.4M
    GROY
    Gold Royalty Corp.
    48.09x -- $4.1M -$1.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns SNWGF or MUX?

    McEwen, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Snowline Gold Corp.'s net margin of -0.91%. Snowline Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -67.18% beat McEwen, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.43%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SNWGF
    Snowline Gold Corp.
    -- -$0.13 $93M
    MUX
    McEwen, Inc.
    0.2% -$0.01 $616.3M
  • What do Analysts Say About SNWGF or MUX?

    Snowline Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand McEwen, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.20 which suggests that it could grow by 14.73%. Given that McEwen, Inc. has higher upside potential than Snowline Gold Corp., analysts believe McEwen, Inc. is more attractive than Snowline Gold Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SNWGF
    Snowline Gold Corp.
    0 0 0
    MUX
    McEwen, Inc.
    5 0 0
  • Is SNWGF or MUX More Risky?

    Snowline Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen, Inc. has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.347%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNWGF or MUX?

    Snowline Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McEwen, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Snowline Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SNWGF or MUX?

    Snowline Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than McEwen, Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.5M. Snowline Gold Corp.'s net income of -$21.4M is lower than McEwen, Inc.'s net income of -$462K. Notably, Snowline Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while McEwen, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snowline Gold Corp. is 60,311.82x versus 6.23x for McEwen, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SNWGF
    Snowline Gold Corp.
    60,311.82x -- -- -$21.4M
    MUX
    McEwen, Inc.
    6.23x 3.42x $50.5M -$462K
  • Which has Higher Returns SNWGF or SA?

    Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Snowline Gold Corp.'s net margin of --. Snowline Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -67.18% beat Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SNWGF
    Snowline Gold Corp.
    -- -$0.13 $93M
    SA
    Seabridge Gold, Inc.
    -- -$0.23 $1.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About SNWGF or SA?

    Snowline Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Seabridge Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $47.03 which suggests that it could grow by 60.53%. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Snowline Gold Corp., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Snowline Gold Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SNWGF
    Snowline Gold Corp.
    0 0 0
    SA
    Seabridge Gold, Inc.
    3 0 0
  • Is SNWGF or SA More Risky?

    Snowline Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.933%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNWGF or SA?

    Snowline Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seabridge Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Snowline Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SNWGF or SA?

    Snowline Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Snowline Gold Corp.'s net income of -$21.4M is higher than Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M. Notably, Snowline Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snowline Gold Corp. is 60,311.82x versus -- for Seabridge Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SNWGF
    Snowline Gold Corp.
    60,311.82x -- -- -$21.4M
    SA
    Seabridge Gold, Inc.
    -- 250.29x -- -$23.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns SNWGF or VITFF?

    Victoria Gold Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Snowline Gold Corp.'s net margin of -10.81%. Snowline Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -67.18% beat Victoria Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 2.62%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SNWGF
    Snowline Gold Corp.
    -- -$0.13 $93M
    VITFF
    Victoria Gold Corp.
    10.82% -$0.10 $608M
  • What do Analysts Say About SNWGF or VITFF?

    Snowline Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Victoria Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Snowline Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Victoria Gold Corp., analysts believe Snowline Gold Corp. is more attractive than Victoria Gold Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SNWGF
    Snowline Gold Corp.
    0 0 0
    VITFF
    Victoria Gold Corp.
    0 0 0
  • Is SNWGF or VITFF More Risky?

    Snowline Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria Gold Corp. has a beta of 18.710, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1770.964%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNWGF or VITFF?

    Snowline Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Victoria Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Snowline Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SNWGF or VITFF?

    Snowline Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Victoria Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $61.5M. Snowline Gold Corp.'s net income of -$21.4M is lower than Victoria Gold Corp.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Snowline Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Victoria Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snowline Gold Corp. is 60,311.82x versus 0.06x for Victoria Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SNWGF
    Snowline Gold Corp.
    60,311.82x -- -- -$21.4M
    VITFF
    Victoria Gold Corp.
    0.06x 2.02x $61.5M -$6.7M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is JetBlue The Best Airline Stock?
Is JetBlue The Best Airline Stock?

Following a general trend of improvement among airline stocks, shares…

Why Did Netflix Buy Warner Bros?
Why Did Netflix Buy Warner Bros?

Following a bidding war, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) has announced its intention…

Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?

Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…

Stock Ideas

Buy
64
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x

Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
59
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
60
OLMA alert for Dec 10

Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [OLMA] is up 15.35% over the past day.

Buy
84
TSAT alert for Dec 10

Telesat Corp. [TSAT] is up 3.07% over the past day.

Buy
54
GDXU alert for Dec 10

MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 4.83% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock