AUST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

McEwen, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Austin Gold Corp.'s net margin of -0.91%. Austin Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -19.82% beat McEwen, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.43%.

Austin Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 81.94%. On the other hand McEwen, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.20 which suggests that it could grow by 18.15%. Given that Austin Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than McEwen, Inc., analysts believe Austin Gold Corp. is more attractive than McEwen, Inc..

Austin Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen, Inc. has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.347%.

Austin Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McEwen, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Austin Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Austin Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than McEwen, Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.5M. Austin Gold Corp.'s net income of -$270.8K is higher than McEwen, Inc.'s net income of -$462K. Notably, Austin Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while McEwen, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Austin Gold Corp. is -- versus 6.05x for McEwen, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Austin Gold Corp.'s net margin of --. Austin Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -19.82% beat Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Austin Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 81.94%. On the other hand Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Austin Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc., analysts believe Austin Gold Corp. is more attractive than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc..

Austin Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has a beta of -0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.28%.

Austin Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Austin Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Austin Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Austin Gold Corp.'s net income of -$270.8K is lower than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$162.8K. Notably, Austin Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Austin Gold Corp. is -- versus -- for Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Austin Gold Corp.'s net margin of --. Austin Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -19.82% beat Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31%.

Austin Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 81.94%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $47.03 which suggests that it could grow by 59.28%. Given that Austin Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Seabridge Gold, Inc., analysts believe Austin Gold Corp. is more attractive than Seabridge Gold, Inc..

Austin Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.933%.

Austin Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seabridge Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Austin Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Austin Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Austin Gold Corp.'s net income of -$270.8K is higher than Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M. Notably, Austin Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Austin Gold Corp. is -- versus -- for Seabridge Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Victoria Gold Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Austin Gold Corp.'s net margin of -10.81%. Austin Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -19.82% beat Victoria Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 2.62%.

Austin Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 81.94%. On the other hand Victoria Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Austin Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Victoria Gold Corp., analysts believe Austin Gold Corp. is more attractive than Victoria Gold Corp..

Austin Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria Gold Corp. has a beta of 18.710, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1770.964%.

Austin Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Victoria Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Austin Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Austin Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Victoria Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $61.5M. Austin Gold Corp.'s net income of -$270.8K is higher than Victoria Gold Corp.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Austin Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Victoria Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Austin Gold Corp. is -- versus 0.06x for Victoria Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.