SA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Royalty Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net margin of -27.31%. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31% beat Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15%.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $47.03, signalling upside risk potential of 53.41%. On the other hand Gold Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $4.79 which suggests that it could grow by 9.26%. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Gold Royalty Corp., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Gold Royalty Corp..

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.933% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M is lower than Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 250.29x while Gold Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seabridge Gold, Inc. is -- versus 51.63x for Gold Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McEwen, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net margin of -0.91%. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31% beat McEwen, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.43%.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $47.03, signalling upside risk potential of 53.41%. On the other hand McEwen, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.20 which suggests that it could grow by 18.59%. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than McEwen, Inc., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than McEwen, Inc..

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.933% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen, Inc. has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.347%.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McEwen, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than McEwen, Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.5M. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M is lower than McEwen, Inc.'s net income of -$462K. Notably, Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 250.29x while McEwen, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seabridge Gold, Inc. is -- versus 6.03x for McEwen, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net margin of --. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31% beat Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $47.03, signalling upside risk potential of 53.41%. On the other hand Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc..

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.933% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has a beta of -0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.28%.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M is lower than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$162.8K. Notably, Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 250.29x while Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seabridge Gold, Inc. is -- versus -- for Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Victoria Gold Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net margin of -10.81%. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31% beat Victoria Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 2.62%.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $47.03, signalling upside risk potential of 53.41%. On the other hand Victoria Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Victoria Gold Corp., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Victoria Gold Corp..

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.933% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria Gold Corp. has a beta of 18.710, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1770.964%.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Victoria Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Victoria Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $61.5M. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M is lower than Victoria Gold Corp.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 250.29x while Victoria Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seabridge Gold, Inc. is -- versus 0.01x for Victoria Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.