Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Buy
61
SA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$31.69
Seasonality move
:
9.93%
Day range:
$32.41 - $34.70
52-week range:
$9.40 - $37.99
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
250.29x
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
4.82x
Volume:
730.2K
Avg. volume:
1.3M
1-year change:
169.44%
Market cap:
$3.7B
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.39
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.03 | -- | -91.18% | $60.49 |
|
ALGLF
Alma Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GMTNF
Gold Mountain Mining Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JSHG
Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RBTK
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
$60.6M | -- | -51.92% | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
$34.38 | $60.49 | $3.7B | 250.29x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
ALGLF
Alma Gold, Inc.
|
$0.0700 | -- | $474.2K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GMTNF
Gold Mountain Mining Corp.
|
$0.0002 | -- | $163.1K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.05x |
|
JSHG
Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.
|
$0.0040 | -- | $820.7K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RBTK
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.
|
$6.25 | -- | $693.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
$0.0540 | -- | $3.7M | 2.02x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.01x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
35.61% | 0.964 | 16.75% | 2.67x |
|
ALGLF
Alma Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -56.005 | -- | 13.93x |
|
GMTNF
Gold Mountain Mining Corp.
|
25.97% | 23.666 | 59.95% | 0.11x |
|
JSHG
Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -1.093 | -- | -- |
|
RBTK
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.
|
-87.44% | -10.043 | 2.92% | 0.00x |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
28.31% | 176.835 | 51.97% | 0.37x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
-$42.1K | -$3.4M | -3.35% | -5.31% | -- | -$40.1M |
|
ALGLF
Alma Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -$125.6K | -61.34% | -61.34% | -- | -$174.4K |
|
GMTNF
Gold Mountain Mining Corp.
|
-$240.7K | -$452.4K | -34.07% | -41.29% | -139.85% | -$1.7M |
|
JSHG
Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RBTK
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$41K | -- | -- | -- | -$42.1K |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
$6.7M | $4.2M | 1.83% | 2.62% | -8.2% | $13.4M |
Seabridge Gold, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SA or ALGLF?
Alma Gold, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net margin of --. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31% beat Alma Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -61.34%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SASeabridge Gold, Inc.-- -$0.23 $1.2B ALGLFAlma Gold, Inc.-- -$0.00 $2M -
What do Analysts Say About SA or ALGLF?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $60.49, signalling upside risk potential of 75.94%. On the other hand Alma Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Alma Gold, Inc., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Alma Gold, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SASeabridge Gold, Inc.3 0 0 ALGLFAlma Gold, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SA or ALGLF More Risky?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.807, which suggesting that the stock is 19.253% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alma Gold, Inc. has a beta of 226.763, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22576.316%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SA or ALGLF?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alma Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alma Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SA or ALGLF?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Alma Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M is lower than Alma Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$128.8K. Notably, Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 250.29x while Alma Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seabridge Gold, Inc. is -- versus -- for Alma Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SASeabridge Gold, Inc.-- 250.29x -- -$23.4M ALGLFAlma Gold, Inc.-- -- -- -$128.8K
-
Which has Higher Returns SA or GMTNF?
Gold Mountain Mining Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net margin of -191.42%. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31% beat Gold Mountain Mining Corp.'s return on equity of -41.29%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SASeabridge Gold, Inc.-- -$0.23 $1.2B GMTNFGold Mountain Mining Corp.-45.09% -- $29.7M -
What do Analysts Say About SA or GMTNF?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $60.49, signalling upside risk potential of 75.94%. On the other hand Gold Mountain Mining Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Gold Mountain Mining Corp., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Gold Mountain Mining Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SASeabridge Gold, Inc.3 0 0 GMTNFGold Mountain Mining Corp.0 0 0 -
Is SA or GMTNF More Risky?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.807, which suggesting that the stock is 19.253% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Mountain Mining Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SA or GMTNF?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Mountain Mining Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Mountain Mining Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SA or GMTNF?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Mountain Mining Corp. quarterly revenues of $533.8K. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M is lower than Gold Mountain Mining Corp.'s net income of -$1M. Notably, Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 250.29x while Gold Mountain Mining Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seabridge Gold, Inc. is -- versus 0.05x for Gold Mountain Mining Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SASeabridge Gold, Inc.-- 250.29x -- -$23.4M GMTNFGold Mountain Mining Corp.0.05x -- $533.8K -$1M
-
Which has Higher Returns SA or JSHG?
Joshua Gold Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net margin of --. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31% beat Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SASeabridge Gold, Inc.-- -$0.23 $1.2B JSHGJoshua Gold Resources, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SA or JSHG?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $60.49, signalling upside risk potential of 75.94%. On the other hand Joshua Gold Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Joshua Gold Resources, Inc., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Joshua Gold Resources, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SASeabridge Gold, Inc.3 0 0 JSHGJoshua Gold Resources, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SA or JSHG More Risky?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.807, which suggesting that the stock is 19.253% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Joshua Gold Resources, Inc. has a beta of -1.203, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 220.254%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SA or JSHG?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Joshua Gold Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Joshua Gold Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SA or JSHG?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Joshua Gold Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M is higher than Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 250.29x while Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seabridge Gold, Inc. is -- versus -- for Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SASeabridge Gold, Inc.-- 250.29x -- -$23.4M JSHGJoshua Gold Resources, Inc.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SA or RBTK?
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net margin of --. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31% beat Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SASeabridge Gold, Inc.-- -$0.23 $1.2B RBTKZhen Ding Resources, Inc.-- -$0.00 -$7.3M -
What do Analysts Say About SA or RBTK?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $60.49, signalling upside risk potential of 75.94%. On the other hand Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SASeabridge Gold, Inc.3 0 0 RBTKZhen Ding Resources, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SA or RBTK More Risky?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.807, which suggesting that the stock is 19.253% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has a beta of -0.953, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 195.315%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SA or RBTK?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SA or RBTK?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M is lower than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$162.8K. Notably, Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 250.29x while Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seabridge Gold, Inc. is -- versus -- for Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SASeabridge Gold, Inc.-- 250.29x -- -$23.4M RBTKZhen Ding Resources, Inc.-- -- -- -$162.8K
-
Which has Higher Returns SA or VITFF?
Victoria Gold Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net margin of -10.81%. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31% beat Victoria Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 2.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SASeabridge Gold, Inc.-- -$0.23 $1.2B VITFFVictoria Gold Corp.10.82% -$0.10 $608M -
What do Analysts Say About SA or VITFF?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $60.49, signalling upside risk potential of 75.94%. On the other hand Victoria Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Victoria Gold Corp., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Victoria Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SASeabridge Gold, Inc.3 0 0 VITFFVictoria Gold Corp.0 0 0 -
Is SA or VITFF More Risky?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.807, which suggesting that the stock is 19.253% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria Gold Corp. has a beta of 19.249, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1824.925%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SA or VITFF?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Victoria Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SA or VITFF?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Victoria Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $61.5M. Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M is lower than Victoria Gold Corp.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 250.29x while Victoria Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Seabridge Gold, Inc. is -- versus 0.01x for Victoria Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SASeabridge Gold, Inc.-- 250.29x -- -$23.4M VITFFVictoria Gold Corp.0.01x 2.02x $61.5M -$6.7M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
40
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
91
TDC alert for Feb 12
Teradata Corp. [TDC] is down 11.64% over the past day.
Buy
67
DIOD alert for Feb 12
Diodes, Inc. [DIOD] is down 7.63% over the past day.
Buy
77
VRT alert for Feb 12
Vertiv Holdings Co. [VRT] is down 4.79% over the past day.
