Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
$60.6M | -- | -51.92% | -- | -- |
|
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
$4M | -$0.01 | 1.34% | -100% | $5.11 |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
$64.5M | $0.28 | 112.69% | -- | $22.60 |
|
RBTK
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.03 | -- | -91.18% | $55.78 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
$0.0541 | -- | $3.7M | 2.02x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.01x |
|
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
|
$1.69 | -- | $23.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
$4.17 | $5.11 | $931.5M | -- | $0.01 | 0% | 49.16x |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
$20.02 | $22.60 | $1.1B | 3.42x | $0.00 | 0% | 6.45x |
|
RBTK
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.
|
$12.22 | -- | $1.4B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
$31.69 | $55.78 | $3.3B | 250.29x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
28.31% | 172.414 | 51.97% | 0.37x |
|
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
|
-- | 1.703 | -- | 43.32x |
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
8.34% | 1.760 | 7.69% | 1.57x |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
20.73% | 1.903 | 13.71% | 1.33x |
|
RBTK
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.
|
-87.44% | -6.757 | 2.92% | 0.00x |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
35.61% | 1.696 | 16.75% | 2.67x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
$6.7M | $4.2M | 1.83% | 2.62% | -8.2% | $13.4M |
|
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
|
-$700 | -$313.5K | -19.82% | -19.82% | -- | -$934.5K |
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
$2.8M | $572K | -1.05% | -1.15% | 13.79% | $1.3M |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
$102K | -$7.6M | -2.04% | -2.43% | -15.09% | -$5.6M |
|
RBTK
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$41K | -- | -- | -- | -$42.1K |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
-$42.1K | -$3.4M | -3.35% | -5.31% | -- | -$40.1M |
Austin Gold Corp. has a net margin of -10.81% compared to Victoria Gold Corp.'s net margin of --. Victoria Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 2.62% beat Austin Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -19.82%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
10.82% | -$0.10 | $608M |
|
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
|
-- | -$0.02 | $8.8M |
Victoria Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Austin Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 64.04%. Given that Austin Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Victoria Gold Corp., analysts believe Austin Gold Corp. is more attractive than Victoria Gold Corp..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Victoria Gold Corp. has a beta of 18.710, which suggesting that the stock is 1770.964% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Austin Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
Victoria Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Austin Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Victoria Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Austin Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Victoria Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $61.5M, which are larger than Austin Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Victoria Gold Corp.'s net income of -$6.7M is lower than Austin Gold Corp.'s net income of -$270.8K. Notably, Victoria Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.02x while Austin Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victoria Gold Corp. is 0.01x versus -- for Austin Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
0.01x | 2.02x | $61.5M | -$6.7M |
|
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -$270.8K |
Gold Royalty Corp. has a net margin of -10.81% compared to Victoria Gold Corp.'s net margin of -27.31%. Victoria Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 2.62% beat Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
10.82% | -$0.10 | $608M |
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
68.47% | -$0.01 | $610.9M |
Victoria Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gold Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.11 which suggests that it could grow by 22.47%. Given that Gold Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than Victoria Gold Corp., analysts believe Gold Royalty Corp. is more attractive than Victoria Gold Corp..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
3 | 0 | 0 |
Victoria Gold Corp. has a beta of 18.710, which suggesting that the stock is 1770.964% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
Victoria Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Victoria Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Victoria Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $61.5M, which are larger than Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. Victoria Gold Corp.'s net income of -$6.7M is lower than Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Victoria Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.02x while Gold Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victoria Gold Corp. is 0.01x versus 49.16x for Gold Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
0.01x | 2.02x | $61.5M | -$6.7M |
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
49.16x | -- | $4.1M | -$1.1M |
McEwen, Inc. has a net margin of -10.81% compared to Victoria Gold Corp.'s net margin of -0.91%. Victoria Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 2.62% beat McEwen, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.43%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
10.82% | -$0.10 | $608M |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
0.2% | -$0.01 | $616.3M |
Victoria Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand McEwen, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.60 which suggests that it could grow by 12.89%. Given that McEwen, Inc. has higher upside potential than Victoria Gold Corp., analysts believe McEwen, Inc. is more attractive than Victoria Gold Corp..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
5 | 0 | 0 |
Victoria Gold Corp. has a beta of 18.710, which suggesting that the stock is 1770.964% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen, Inc. has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.347%.
Victoria Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McEwen, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Victoria Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Victoria Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $61.5M, which are larger than McEwen, Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.5M. Victoria Gold Corp.'s net income of -$6.7M is lower than McEwen, Inc.'s net income of -$462K. Notably, Victoria Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.02x while McEwen, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victoria Gold Corp. is 0.01x versus 6.45x for McEwen, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
0.01x | 2.02x | $61.5M | -$6.7M |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
6.45x | 3.42x | $50.5M | -$462K |
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -10.81% compared to Victoria Gold Corp.'s net margin of --. Victoria Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 2.62% beat Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
10.82% | -$0.10 | $608M |
|
RBTK
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.00 | -$7.3M |
Victoria Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Victoria Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc., analysts believe Victoria Gold Corp. is more attractive than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
RBTK
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Victoria Gold Corp. has a beta of 18.710, which suggesting that the stock is 1770.964% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has a beta of -0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.28%.
Victoria Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Victoria Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Victoria Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $61.5M, which are larger than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Victoria Gold Corp.'s net income of -$6.7M is lower than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$162.8K. Notably, Victoria Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.02x while Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victoria Gold Corp. is 0.01x versus -- for Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
0.01x | 2.02x | $61.5M | -$6.7M |
|
RBTK
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -$162.8K |
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a net margin of -10.81% compared to Victoria Gold Corp.'s net margin of --. Victoria Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 2.62% beat Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
10.82% | -$0.10 | $608M |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.23 | $1.2B |
Victoria Gold Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Seabridge Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $55.78 which suggests that it could grow by 76.03%. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Victoria Gold Corp., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Victoria Gold Corp..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
3 | 0 | 0 |
Victoria Gold Corp. has a beta of 18.710, which suggesting that the stock is 1770.964% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.933%.
Victoria Gold Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seabridge Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Victoria Gold Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Victoria Gold Corp. quarterly revenues are $61.5M, which are larger than Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Victoria Gold Corp.'s net income of -$6.7M is higher than Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M. Notably, Victoria Gold Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.02x while Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victoria Gold Corp. is 0.01x versus -- for Seabridge Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
0.01x | 2.02x | $61.5M | -$6.7M |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
-- | 250.29x | -- | -$23.4M |
Signup to receive the latest stock alerts
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 0.65% over the past day.
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Structure Therapeutics, Inc. [GPCR] is down 2.36% over the past day.