MUX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Royalty Corp. has a net margin of -0.91% compared to McEwen, Inc.'s net margin of -27.31%. McEwen, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.43% beat Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15%.

McEwen, Inc. has a consensus price target of $22.20, signalling upside risk potential of 18.15%. On the other hand Gold Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $4.79 which suggests that it could grow by 15.04%. Given that McEwen, Inc. has higher upside potential than Gold Royalty Corp., analysts believe McEwen, Inc. is more attractive than Gold Royalty Corp..

McEwen, Inc. has a beta of 1.063, which suggesting that the stock is 6.347% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

McEwen, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. McEwen, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

McEwen, Inc. quarterly revenues are $50.5M, which are larger than Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. McEwen, Inc.'s net income of -$462K is higher than Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, McEwen, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.42x while Gold Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McEwen, Inc. is 6.05x versus 49.04x for Gold Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -0.91% compared to McEwen, Inc.'s net margin of --. McEwen, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.43% beat Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

McEwen, Inc. has a consensus price target of $22.20, signalling upside risk potential of 18.15%. On the other hand Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that McEwen, Inc. has higher upside potential than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc., analysts believe McEwen, Inc. is more attractive than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc..

McEwen, Inc. has a beta of 1.063, which suggesting that the stock is 6.347% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has a beta of -0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.28%.

McEwen, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. McEwen, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

McEwen, Inc. quarterly revenues are $50.5M, which are larger than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. McEwen, Inc.'s net income of -$462K is lower than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$162.8K. Notably, McEwen, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.42x while Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McEwen, Inc. is 6.05x versus -- for Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a net margin of -0.91% compared to McEwen, Inc.'s net margin of --. McEwen, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.43% beat Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31%.

McEwen, Inc. has a consensus price target of $22.20, signalling upside risk potential of 18.15%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $47.03 which suggests that it could grow by 59.28%. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than McEwen, Inc., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than McEwen, Inc..

McEwen, Inc. has a beta of 1.063, which suggesting that the stock is 6.347% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.933%.

McEwen, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seabridge Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. McEwen, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

McEwen, Inc. quarterly revenues are $50.5M, which are larger than Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. McEwen, Inc.'s net income of -$462K is higher than Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M. Notably, McEwen, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.42x while Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McEwen, Inc. is 6.05x versus -- for Seabridge Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Victoria Gold Corp. has a net margin of -0.91% compared to McEwen, Inc.'s net margin of -10.81%. McEwen, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.43% beat Victoria Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 2.62%.

McEwen, Inc. has a consensus price target of $22.20, signalling upside risk potential of 18.15%. On the other hand Victoria Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that McEwen, Inc. has higher upside potential than Victoria Gold Corp., analysts believe McEwen, Inc. is more attractive than Victoria Gold Corp..

McEwen, Inc. has a beta of 1.063, which suggesting that the stock is 6.347% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria Gold Corp. has a beta of 18.710, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1770.964%.

McEwen, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Victoria Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. McEwen, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

McEwen, Inc. quarterly revenues are $50.5M, which are smaller than Victoria Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $61.5M. McEwen, Inc.'s net income of -$462K is higher than Victoria Gold Corp.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, McEwen, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.42x while Victoria Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McEwen, Inc. is 6.05x versus 0.06x for Victoria Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.