MUX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Austin Gold has a net margin of -24.56% compared to McEwen Mining's net margin of --. McEwen Mining's return on equity of -8.85% beat Austin Gold's return on equity of --.

McEwen Mining has a consensus price target of $15.06, signalling upside risk potential of 103.82%. On the other hand Austin Gold has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 144.06%. Given that Austin Gold has higher upside potential than McEwen Mining, analysts believe Austin Gold is more attractive than McEwen Mining.

McEwen Mining has a beta of 0.929, which suggesting that the stock is 7.098% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Austin Gold has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

McEwen Mining has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Austin Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. McEwen Mining pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Austin Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

McEwen Mining quarterly revenues are $33.5M, which are larger than Austin Gold quarterly revenues of --. McEwen Mining's net income of -$8.2M is lower than Austin Gold's net income of -$739.9K. Notably, McEwen Mining's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.42x while Austin Gold's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McEwen Mining is 2.16x versus -- for Austin Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Royalty has a net margin of -24.56% compared to McEwen Mining's net margin of -95.17%. McEwen Mining's return on equity of -8.85% beat Gold Royalty's return on equity of -0.63%.

McEwen Mining has a consensus price target of $15.06, signalling upside risk potential of 103.82%. On the other hand Gold Royalty has an analysts' consensus of $3.11 which suggests that it could grow by 100.65%. Given that McEwen Mining has higher upside potential than Gold Royalty, analysts believe McEwen Mining is more attractive than Gold Royalty.

McEwen Mining has a beta of 0.929, which suggesting that the stock is 7.098% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

McEwen Mining has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. McEwen Mining pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

McEwen Mining quarterly revenues are $33.5M, which are larger than Gold Royalty quarterly revenues of $3.4M. McEwen Mining's net income of -$8.2M is lower than Gold Royalty's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, McEwen Mining's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.42x while Gold Royalty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McEwen Mining is 2.16x versus 24.51x for Gold Royalty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rise Gold has a net margin of -24.56% compared to McEwen Mining's net margin of --. McEwen Mining's return on equity of -8.85% beat Rise Gold's return on equity of --.

McEwen Mining has a consensus price target of $15.06, signalling upside risk potential of 103.82%. On the other hand Rise Gold has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that McEwen Mining has higher upside potential than Rise Gold, analysts believe McEwen Mining is more attractive than Rise Gold.

McEwen Mining has a beta of 0.929, which suggesting that the stock is 7.098% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rise Gold has a beta of -1.562, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 256.205%.

McEwen Mining has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rise Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. McEwen Mining pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rise Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

McEwen Mining quarterly revenues are $33.5M, which are larger than Rise Gold quarterly revenues of --. McEwen Mining's net income of -$8.2M is lower than Rise Gold's net income of -$686.3K. Notably, McEwen Mining's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.42x while Rise Gold's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McEwen Mining is 2.16x versus -- for Rise Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold has a net margin of -24.56% compared to McEwen Mining's net margin of --. McEwen Mining's return on equity of -8.85% beat Seabridge Gold's return on equity of --.

McEwen Mining has a consensus price target of $15.06, signalling upside risk potential of 103.82%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold has an analysts' consensus of $39.67 which suggests that it could grow by 222.82%. Given that Seabridge Gold has higher upside potential than McEwen Mining, analysts believe Seabridge Gold is more attractive than McEwen Mining.

McEwen Mining has a beta of 0.929, which suggesting that the stock is 7.098% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold has a beta of 0.669, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.062%.

McEwen Mining has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seabridge Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. McEwen Mining pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

McEwen Mining quarterly revenues are $33.5M, which are larger than Seabridge Gold quarterly revenues of --. McEwen Mining's net income of -$8.2M is higher than Seabridge Gold's net income of -$20.2M. Notably, McEwen Mining's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.42x while Seabridge Gold's PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McEwen Mining is 2.16x versus -- for Seabridge Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.