MUX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gatos Silver has a net margin of -3.98% compared to McEwen Mining's net margin of --. McEwen Mining's return on equity of 21.4% beat Gatos Silver's return on equity of --.

McEwen Mining has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 83.27%. On the other hand Gatos Silver has an analysts' consensus of $14.25 which suggests that it could grow by 15.16%. Given that McEwen Mining has higher upside potential than Gatos Silver, analysts believe McEwen Mining is more attractive than Gatos Silver.

McEwen Mining has a beta of 1.429, which suggesting that the stock is 42.879% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gatos Silver has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

McEwen Mining has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gatos Silver offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. McEwen Mining pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gatos Silver pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

McEwen Mining quarterly revenues are $52.3M, which are larger than Gatos Silver quarterly revenues of --. McEwen Mining's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Gatos Silver's net income of $9.9M. Notably, McEwen Mining's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.63x while Gatos Silver's PE ratio is 28.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McEwen Mining is 1.99x versus -- for Gatos Silver. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Royalty has a net margin of -3.98% compared to McEwen Mining's net margin of -124.64%. McEwen Mining's return on equity of 21.4% beat Gold Royalty's return on equity of -3.65%.

McEwen Mining has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 83.27%. On the other hand Gold Royalty has an analysts' consensus of $3.39 which suggests that it could grow by 171.89%. Given that Gold Royalty has higher upside potential than McEwen Mining, analysts believe Gold Royalty is more attractive than McEwen Mining.

McEwen Mining has a beta of 1.429, which suggesting that the stock is 42.879% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

McEwen Mining has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. McEwen Mining pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty pays out -9.71% of its earnings as a dividend.

McEwen Mining quarterly revenues are $52.3M, which are larger than Gold Royalty quarterly revenues of $2.1M. McEwen Mining's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Gold Royalty's net income of $3.4M. Notably, McEwen Mining's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.63x while Gold Royalty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McEwen Mining is 1.99x versus 23.37x for Gold Royalty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rise Gold has a net margin of -3.98% compared to McEwen Mining's net margin of --. McEwen Mining's return on equity of 21.4% beat Rise Gold's return on equity of --.

McEwen Mining has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 83.27%. On the other hand Rise Gold has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that McEwen Mining has higher upside potential than Rise Gold, analysts believe McEwen Mining is more attractive than Rise Gold.

McEwen Mining has a beta of 1.429, which suggesting that the stock is 42.879% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rise Gold has a beta of -0.822, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 182.165%.

McEwen Mining has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rise Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. McEwen Mining pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rise Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

McEwen Mining quarterly revenues are $52.3M, which are larger than Rise Gold quarterly revenues of --. McEwen Mining's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Rise Gold's net income of -$628.4K. Notably, McEwen Mining's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.63x while Rise Gold's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McEwen Mining is 1.99x versus -- for Rise Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold has a net margin of -3.98% compared to McEwen Mining's net margin of --. McEwen Mining's return on equity of 21.4% beat Seabridge Gold's return on equity of --.

McEwen Mining has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 83.27%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 247.61%. Given that Seabridge Gold has higher upside potential than McEwen Mining, analysts believe Seabridge Gold is more attractive than McEwen Mining.

McEwen Mining has a beta of 1.429, which suggesting that the stock is 42.879% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold has a beta of 1.067, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.701%.

McEwen Mining has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seabridge Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. McEwen Mining pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

McEwen Mining quarterly revenues are $52.3M, which are larger than Seabridge Gold quarterly revenues of --. McEwen Mining's net income of -$2.1M is higher than Seabridge Gold's net income of -$20.2M. Notably, McEwen Mining's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.63x while Seabridge Gold's PE ratio is 263.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McEwen Mining is 1.99x versus -- for Seabridge Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.