Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
$4.9M | -$0.00 | 91.21% | -89.36% | $6.04 |
|
JSHG
Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
$72.8M | $0.13 | 80.97% | -- | $27.30 |
|
RBTK
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.03 | -- | -91.18% | $60.49 |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
$60.6M | -- | -51.92% | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
$4.07 | $6.04 | $923.7M | -- | $0.01 | 0% | 47.98x |
|
JSHG
Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.
|
$0.0023 | -- | $477K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
$24.43 | $27.30 | $1.4B | 41.50x | $0.00 | 0% | 6.63x |
|
RBTK
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.
|
$6.25 | -- | $693.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
$32.62 | $60.49 | $3.5B | 250.29x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
$0.0051 | -- | $345.4K | 2.02x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.00x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
8.34% | 1.515 | 7.69% | 1.57x |
|
JSHG
Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.
|
-- | 0.292 | -- | -- |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
19.01% | 1.027 | 12.71% | 1.13x |
|
RBTK
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.
|
-87.44% | -10.481 | 2.92% | 0.00x |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
35.61% | -0.137 | 16.75% | 2.67x |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
28.31% | 173.031 | 51.97% | 0.37x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
$2.8M | $572K | -1.05% | -1.15% | 13.79% | $1.3M |
|
JSHG
Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
$10.2M | -$5.7M | 5.65% | 6.9% | -8.88% | -$6.5M |
|
RBTK
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$41K | -- | -- | -- | -$42.1K |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
-$42.1K | -$3.4M | -3.35% | -5.31% | -- | -$40.1M |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
$6.7M | $4.2M | 1.83% | 2.62% | -8.2% | $13.4M |
Joshua Gold Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -27.31% compared to Gold Royalty Corp.'s net margin of --. Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15% beat Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
68.47% | -$0.01 | $610.9M |
|
JSHG
Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- |
Gold Royalty Corp. has a consensus price target of $6.04, signalling upside risk potential of 48.3%. On the other hand Joshua Gold Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gold Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than Joshua Gold Resources, Inc., analysts believe Gold Royalty Corp. is more attractive than Joshua Gold Resources, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
2 | 1 | 0 |
|
JSHG
Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Joshua Gold Resources, Inc. has a beta of -1.097, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 209.655%.
Gold Royalty Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Joshua Gold Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gold Royalty Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Joshua Gold Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues are $4.1M, which are larger than Joshua Gold Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M is higher than Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Gold Royalty Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gold Royalty Corp. is 47.98x versus -- for Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
47.98x | -- | $4.1M | -$1.1M |
|
JSHG
Joshua Gold Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
McEwen, Inc. has a net margin of -27.31% compared to Gold Royalty Corp.'s net margin of 59%. Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15% beat McEwen, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.9%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
68.47% | -$0.01 | $610.9M |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
15.78% | $0.66 | $674.4M |
Gold Royalty Corp. has a consensus price target of $6.04, signalling upside risk potential of 48.3%. On the other hand McEwen, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.30 which suggests that it could grow by 11.75%. Given that Gold Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than McEwen, Inc., analysts believe Gold Royalty Corp. is more attractive than McEwen, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
2 | 1 | 0 |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
5 | 0 | 0 |
Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen, Inc. has a beta of 1.114, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.356%.
Gold Royalty Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McEwen, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gold Royalty Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues are $4.1M, which are smaller than McEwen, Inc. quarterly revenues of $64.6M. Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M is lower than McEwen, Inc.'s net income of $38.1M. Notably, Gold Royalty Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while McEwen, Inc.'s PE ratio is 41.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gold Royalty Corp. is 47.98x versus 6.63x for McEwen, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
47.98x | -- | $4.1M | -$1.1M |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
6.63x | 41.50x | $64.6M | $38.1M |
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -27.31% compared to Gold Royalty Corp.'s net margin of --. Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15% beat Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
68.47% | -$0.01 | $610.9M |
|
RBTK
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.00 | -$7.3M |
Gold Royalty Corp. has a consensus price target of $6.04, signalling upside risk potential of 48.3%. On the other hand Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gold Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc., analysts believe Gold Royalty Corp. is more attractive than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
2 | 1 | 0 |
|
RBTK
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. has a beta of -0.930, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 193.02%.
Gold Royalty Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gold Royalty Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues are $4.1M, which are larger than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M is lower than Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$162.8K. Notably, Gold Royalty Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gold Royalty Corp. is 47.98x versus -- for Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
47.98x | -- | $4.1M | -$1.1M |
|
RBTK
Zhen Ding Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -$162.8K |
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a net margin of -27.31% compared to Gold Royalty Corp.'s net margin of --. Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15% beat Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
68.47% | -$0.01 | $610.9M |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.23 | $1.2B |
Gold Royalty Corp. has a consensus price target of $6.04, signalling upside risk potential of 48.3%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $60.49 which suggests that it could grow by 85.43%. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Gold Royalty Corp., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Gold Royalty Corp..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
2 | 1 | 0 |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
3 | 0 | 0 |
Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.759, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.144%.
Gold Royalty Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seabridge Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gold Royalty Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues are $4.1M, which are larger than Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M is higher than Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M. Notably, Gold Royalty Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gold Royalty Corp. is 47.98x versus -- for Seabridge Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
47.98x | -- | $4.1M | -$1.1M |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
-- | 250.29x | -- | -$23.4M |
Victoria Gold Corp. has a net margin of -27.31% compared to Gold Royalty Corp.'s net margin of -10.81%. Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15% beat Victoria Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 2.62%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
68.47% | -$0.01 | $610.9M |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
10.82% | -$0.10 | $608M |
Gold Royalty Corp. has a consensus price target of $6.04, signalling upside risk potential of 48.3%. On the other hand Victoria Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gold Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than Victoria Gold Corp., analysts believe Gold Royalty Corp. is more attractive than Victoria Gold Corp..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
2 | 1 | 0 |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria Gold Corp. has a beta of 20.364, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1936.35%.
Gold Royalty Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Victoria Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gold Royalty Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues are $4.1M, which are smaller than Victoria Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $61.5M. Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M is higher than Victoria Gold Corp.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Gold Royalty Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Victoria Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gold Royalty Corp. is 47.98x versus 0.00x for Victoria Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
47.98x | -- | $4.1M | -$1.1M |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
0.00x | 2.02x | $61.5M | -$6.7M |
Signup to receive the latest stock alerts
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
American Public Education, Inc. [APEI] is up 26.24% over the past day.
Papa John's International, Inc. [PZZA] is down 5.25% over the past day.
Nebius Group NV [NBIS] is up 0.87% over the past day.