RUSMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Global Industrial has a net margin of 3.17% compared to Russel Metals's net margin of 4.91%. Russel Metals's return on equity of 10.93% beat Global Industrial's return on equity of 25.02%.

Russel Metals has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global Industrial has an analysts' consensus of $45.00 which suggests that it could grow by 66.74%. Given that Global Industrial has higher upside potential than Russel Metals, analysts believe Global Industrial is more attractive than Russel Metals.

Russel Metals has a beta of 1.477, which suggesting that the stock is 47.651% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Industrial has a beta of 0.881, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.885%.

Russel Metals has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. Global Industrial offers a yield of 4.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Russel Metals pays 36.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial pays out 43.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Russel Metals quarterly revenues are $798.3M, which are larger than Global Industrial quarterly revenues of $342.4M. Russel Metals's net income of $25.3M is higher than Global Industrial's net income of $16.8M. Notably, Russel Metals's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.00x while Global Industrial's PE ratio is 14.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Russel Metals is 0.56x versus 0.69x for Global Industrial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Li-Cycle Holdings has a net margin of 3.17% compared to Russel Metals's net margin of -97.62%. Russel Metals's return on equity of 10.93% beat Li-Cycle Holdings's return on equity of -43.81%.

Russel Metals has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Li-Cycle Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $2.63 which suggests that it could fall by -3.85%. Given that Li-Cycle Holdings has higher upside potential than Russel Metals, analysts believe Li-Cycle Holdings is more attractive than Russel Metals.

Russel Metals has a beta of 1.477, which suggesting that the stock is 47.651% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li-Cycle Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Russel Metals has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. Li-Cycle Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Russel Metals pays 36.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Li-Cycle Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Russel Metals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Russel Metals quarterly revenues are $798.3M, which are larger than Li-Cycle Holdings quarterly revenues of $8.4M. Russel Metals's net income of $25.3M is lower than Li-Cycle Holdings's net income of $56.5M. Notably, Russel Metals's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.00x while Li-Cycle Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Russel Metals is 0.56x versus 1.99x for Li-Cycle Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryerson Holding has a net margin of 3.17% compared to Russel Metals's net margin of -0.59%. Russel Metals's return on equity of 10.93% beat Ryerson Holding's return on equity of 2.43%.

Russel Metals has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ryerson Holding has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could grow by 32.96%. Given that Ryerson Holding has higher upside potential than Russel Metals, analysts believe Ryerson Holding is more attractive than Russel Metals.

Russel Metals has a beta of 1.477, which suggesting that the stock is 47.651% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryerson Holding has a beta of 1.594, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.364%.

Russel Metals has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. Ryerson Holding offers a yield of 4.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Russel Metals pays 36.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryerson Holding pays out 17.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Russel Metals quarterly revenues are $798.3M, which are smaller than Ryerson Holding quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Russel Metals's net income of $25.3M is higher than Ryerson Holding's net income of -$6.6M. Notably, Russel Metals's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.00x while Ryerson Holding's PE ratio is 28.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Russel Metals is 0.56x versus 0.13x for Ryerson Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Transcat has a net margin of 3.17% compared to Russel Metals's net margin of 4.85%. Russel Metals's return on equity of 10.93% beat Transcat's return on equity of 8.06%.

Russel Metals has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Transcat has an analysts' consensus of $121.20 which suggests that it could grow by 15.14%. Given that Transcat has higher upside potential than Russel Metals, analysts believe Transcat is more attractive than Russel Metals.

Russel Metals has a beta of 1.477, which suggesting that the stock is 47.651% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Transcat has a beta of 0.707, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.308%.

Russel Metals has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. Transcat offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Russel Metals pays 36.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Transcat pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Russel Metals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Russel Metals quarterly revenues are $798.3M, which are larger than Transcat quarterly revenues of $67.8M. Russel Metals's net income of $25.3M is higher than Transcat's net income of $3.3M. Notably, Russel Metals's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.00x while Transcat's PE ratio is 52.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Russel Metals is 0.56x versus 3.51x for Transcat. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.