TRNS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

L.B. Foster has a net margin of 3.53% compared to Transcat's net margin of -0.19%. Transcat's return on equity of 6.75% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity of 26.94%.

Transcat has a consensus price target of $100.15, signalling upside risk potential of 40.96%. On the other hand L.B. Foster has an analysts' consensus of $33.00 which suggests that it could grow by 58.5%. Given that L.B. Foster has higher upside potential than Transcat, analysts believe L.B. Foster is more attractive than Transcat.

Transcat has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L.B. Foster has a beta of 0.966, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.355%.

Transcat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. L.B. Foster offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transcat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. L.B. Foster pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Transcat quarterly revenues are $66.8M, which are smaller than L.B. Foster quarterly revenues of $128.2M. Transcat's net income of $2.4M is higher than L.B. Foster's net income of -$242K. Notably, Transcat's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.79x while L.B. Foster's PE ratio is 5.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcat is 2.39x versus 0.43x for L.B. Foster. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Industrial has a net margin of 3.53% compared to Transcat's net margin of 3.54%. Transcat's return on equity of 6.75% beat Global Industrial's return on equity of 22.66%.

Transcat has a consensus price target of $100.15, signalling upside risk potential of 40.96%. On the other hand Global Industrial has an analysts' consensus of $38.00 which suggests that it could grow by 66.74%. Given that Global Industrial has higher upside potential than Transcat, analysts believe Global Industrial is more attractive than Transcat.

Transcat has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Industrial has a beta of 0.853, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.723%.

Transcat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Industrial offers a yield of 4.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Transcat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial pays out 62.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcat quarterly revenues are $66.8M, which are smaller than Global Industrial quarterly revenues of $302.3M. Transcat's net income of $2.4M is lower than Global Industrial's net income of $10.7M. Notably, Transcat's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.79x while Global Industrial's PE ratio is 14.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcat is 2.39x versus 0.67x for Global Industrial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MSC Industrial Direct has a net margin of 3.53% compared to Transcat's net margin of 5.02%. Transcat's return on equity of 6.75% beat MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 16.85%.

Transcat has a consensus price target of $100.15, signalling upside risk potential of 40.96%. On the other hand MSC Industrial Direct has an analysts' consensus of $85.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.39%. Given that Transcat has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct, analysts believe Transcat is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct.

Transcat has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.819%.

Transcat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MSC Industrial Direct offers a yield of 4.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Transcat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct pays out 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcat quarterly revenues are $66.8M, which are smaller than MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues of $928.5M. Transcat's net income of $2.4M is lower than MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $46.6M. Notably, Transcat's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.79x while MSC Industrial Direct's PE ratio is 18.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcat is 2.39x versus 1.17x for MSC Industrial Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryerson Holding has a net margin of 3.53% compared to Transcat's net margin of -0.43%. Transcat's return on equity of 6.75% beat Ryerson Holding's return on equity of -0.99%.

Transcat has a consensus price target of $100.15, signalling upside risk potential of 40.96%. On the other hand Ryerson Holding has an analysts' consensus of $25.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.07%. Given that Transcat has higher upside potential than Ryerson Holding, analysts believe Transcat is more attractive than Ryerson Holding.

Transcat has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryerson Holding has a beta of 1.531, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.084%.

Transcat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryerson Holding offers a yield of 3.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Transcat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryerson Holding pays out -288.37% of its earnings as a dividend.

Transcat quarterly revenues are $66.8M, which are smaller than Ryerson Holding quarterly revenues of $1B. Transcat's net income of $2.4M is higher than Ryerson Holding's net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Transcat's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.79x while Ryerson Holding's PE ratio is 36.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcat is 2.39x versus 0.17x for Ryerson Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.