GIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EVI Industries has a net margin of 4.24% compared to Global Industrial's net margin of 1.22%. Global Industrial's return on equity of 22.27% beat EVI Industries's return on equity of 5.46%.

Global Industrial has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.32%. On the other hand EVI Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global Industrial has higher upside potential than EVI Industries, analysts believe Global Industrial is more attractive than EVI Industries.

Global Industrial has a beta of 0.819, which suggesting that the stock is 18.095% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EVI Industries has a beta of -0.046, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.611%.

Global Industrial has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.89%. EVI Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Global Industrial pays 62.95% of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries pays out 72.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Industrial quarterly revenues are $321M, which are larger than EVI Industries quarterly revenues of $92.7M. Global Industrial's net income of $13.6M is higher than EVI Industries's net income of $1.1M. Notably, Global Industrial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.44x while EVI Industries's PE ratio is 34.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Industrial is 0.76x versus 0.60x for EVI Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L.B. Foster has a net margin of 4.24% compared to Global Industrial's net margin of -2.16%. Global Industrial's return on equity of 22.27% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity of 22.04%.

Global Industrial has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.32%. On the other hand L.B. Foster has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 59.6%. Given that L.B. Foster has higher upside potential than Global Industrial, analysts believe L.B. Foster is more attractive than Global Industrial.

Global Industrial has a beta of 0.819, which suggesting that the stock is 18.095% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L.B. Foster has a beta of 0.950, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.034%.

Global Industrial has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.89%. L.B. Foster offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Industrial pays 62.95% of its earnings as a dividend. L.B. Foster pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Industrial quarterly revenues are $321M, which are larger than L.B. Foster quarterly revenues of $97.8M. Global Industrial's net income of $13.6M is higher than L.B. Foster's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Global Industrial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.44x while L.B. Foster's PE ratio is 5.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Industrial is 0.76x versus 0.39x for L.B. Foster. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryerson Holding has a net margin of 4.24% compared to Global Industrial's net margin of -0.49%. Global Industrial's return on equity of 22.27% beat Ryerson Holding's return on equity of -0.77%.

Global Industrial has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.32%. On the other hand Ryerson Holding has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.85%. Given that Global Industrial has higher upside potential than Ryerson Holding, analysts believe Global Industrial is more attractive than Ryerson Holding.

Global Industrial has a beta of 0.819, which suggesting that the stock is 18.095% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryerson Holding has a beta of 1.642, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.166%.

Global Industrial has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.89%. Ryerson Holding offers a yield of 3.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Global Industrial pays 62.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryerson Holding pays out -288.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Industrial quarterly revenues are $321M, which are smaller than Ryerson Holding quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Global Industrial's net income of $13.6M is higher than Ryerson Holding's net income of -$5.6M. Notably, Global Industrial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.44x while Ryerson Holding's PE ratio is 36.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Industrial is 0.76x versus 0.15x for Ryerson Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Transcat has a net margin of 4.24% compared to Global Industrial's net margin of 3.53%. Global Industrial's return on equity of 22.27% beat Transcat's return on equity of 6.75%.

Global Industrial has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.32%. On the other hand Transcat has an analysts' consensus of $100.15 which suggests that it could grow by 26.22%. Given that Global Industrial has higher upside potential than Transcat, analysts believe Global Industrial is more attractive than Transcat.

Global Industrial has a beta of 0.819, which suggesting that the stock is 18.095% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Transcat has a beta of 0.693, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.664%.

Global Industrial has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.89%. Transcat offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Industrial pays 62.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Transcat pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Industrial quarterly revenues are $321M, which are larger than Transcat quarterly revenues of $66.8M. Global Industrial's net income of $13.6M is higher than Transcat's net income of $2.4M. Notably, Global Industrial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.44x while Transcat's PE ratio is 42.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Industrial is 0.76x versus 2.67x for Transcat. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.