GIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EVI Industries has a net margin of 3.54% compared to Global Industrial's net margin of 1.22%. Global Industrial's return on equity of 22.66% beat EVI Industries's return on equity of 5.46%.

Global Industrial has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 69.87%. On the other hand EVI Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global Industrial has higher upside potential than EVI Industries, analysts believe Global Industrial is more attractive than EVI Industries.

Global Industrial has a beta of 0.853, which suggesting that the stock is 14.723% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EVI Industries has a beta of 0.309, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.124%.

Global Industrial has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.52%. EVI Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Global Industrial pays 62.95% of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries pays out 72.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Industrial quarterly revenues are $302.3M, which are larger than EVI Industries quarterly revenues of $92.7M. Global Industrial's net income of $10.7M is higher than EVI Industries's net income of $1.1M. Notably, Global Industrial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.25x while EVI Industries's PE ratio is 38.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Industrial is 0.65x versus 0.66x for EVI Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L.B. Foster has a net margin of 3.54% compared to Global Industrial's net margin of -0.19%. Global Industrial's return on equity of 22.66% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity of 26.94%.

Global Industrial has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 69.87%. On the other hand L.B. Foster has an analysts' consensus of $33.00 which suggests that it could grow by 61.37%. Given that Global Industrial has higher upside potential than L.B. Foster, analysts believe Global Industrial is more attractive than L.B. Foster.

Global Industrial has a beta of 0.853, which suggesting that the stock is 14.723% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L.B. Foster has a beta of 0.966, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.355%.

Global Industrial has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.52%. L.B. Foster offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Industrial pays 62.95% of its earnings as a dividend. L.B. Foster pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Industrial quarterly revenues are $302.3M, which are larger than L.B. Foster quarterly revenues of $128.2M. Global Industrial's net income of $10.7M is higher than L.B. Foster's net income of -$242K. Notably, Global Industrial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.25x while L.B. Foster's PE ratio is 5.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Industrial is 0.65x versus 0.42x for L.B. Foster. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryerson Holding has a net margin of 3.54% compared to Global Industrial's net margin of -0.43%. Global Industrial's return on equity of 22.66% beat Ryerson Holding's return on equity of -0.99%.

Global Industrial has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 69.87%. On the other hand Ryerson Holding has an analysts' consensus of $25.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.22%. Given that Global Industrial has higher upside potential than Ryerson Holding, analysts believe Global Industrial is more attractive than Ryerson Holding.

Global Industrial has a beta of 0.853, which suggesting that the stock is 14.723% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryerson Holding has a beta of 1.531, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.084%.

Global Industrial has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.52%. Ryerson Holding offers a yield of 3.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Global Industrial pays 62.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryerson Holding pays out -288.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Industrial quarterly revenues are $302.3M, which are smaller than Ryerson Holding quarterly revenues of $1B. Global Industrial's net income of $10.7M is higher than Ryerson Holding's net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Global Industrial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.25x while Ryerson Holding's PE ratio is 36.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Industrial is 0.65x versus 0.17x for Ryerson Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Transcat has a net margin of 3.54% compared to Global Industrial's net margin of 3.53%. Global Industrial's return on equity of 22.66% beat Transcat's return on equity of 6.75%.

Global Industrial has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 69.87%. On the other hand Transcat has an analysts' consensus of $100.15 which suggests that it could grow by 45.09%. Given that Global Industrial has higher upside potential than Transcat, analysts believe Global Industrial is more attractive than Transcat.

Global Industrial has a beta of 0.853, which suggesting that the stock is 14.723% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Transcat has a beta of 0.662, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.82%.

Global Industrial has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.52%. Transcat offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Industrial pays 62.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Transcat pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Industrial quarterly revenues are $302.3M, which are larger than Transcat quarterly revenues of $66.8M. Global Industrial's net income of $10.7M is higher than Transcat's net income of $2.4M. Notably, Global Industrial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.25x while Transcat's PE ratio is 36.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Industrial is 0.65x versus 2.32x for Transcat. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.