GIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

L.B. Foster Co. has a net margin of 5.26% compared to Global Industrial Co.'s net margin of 3.13%. Global Industrial Co.'s return on equity of 22.9% beat L.B. Foster Co.'s return on equity of 2.7%.

Global Industrial Co. has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.71%. On the other hand L.B. Foster Co. has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could fall by -3.23%. Given that Global Industrial Co. has higher upside potential than L.B. Foster Co., analysts believe Global Industrial Co. is more attractive than L.B. Foster Co..

Global Industrial Co. has a beta of 0.902, which suggesting that the stock is 9.844% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L.B. Foster Co. has a beta of 1.006, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.61899999999999%.

Global Industrial Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. L.B. Foster Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Industrial Co. pays 63.37% of its earnings as a dividend. L.B. Foster Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Industrial Co. quarterly revenues are $353.6M, which are larger than L.B. Foster Co. quarterly revenues of $138.3M. Global Industrial Co.'s net income of $18.6M is higher than L.B. Foster Co.'s net income of $4.3M. Notably, Global Industrial Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.22x while L.B. Foster Co.'s PE ratio is 69.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Industrial Co. is 0.92x versus 0.65x for L.B. Foster Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

W.W. Grainger, Inc. has a net margin of 5.26% compared to Global Industrial Co.'s net margin of 10.83%. Global Industrial Co.'s return on equity of 22.9% beat W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s return on equity of 45.81%.

Global Industrial Co. has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.71%. On the other hand W.W. Grainger, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1,131.31 which suggests that it could grow by 0.38%. Given that Global Industrial Co. has higher upside potential than W.W. Grainger, Inc., analysts believe Global Industrial Co. is more attractive than W.W. Grainger, Inc..

Global Industrial Co. has a beta of 0.902, which suggesting that the stock is 9.844% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W.W. Grainger, Inc. has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.49%.

Global Industrial Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. W.W. Grainger, Inc. offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share. Global Industrial Co. pays 63.37% of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger, Inc. pays out 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Industrial Co. quarterly revenues are $353.6M, which are smaller than W.W. Grainger, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Global Industrial Co.'s net income of $18.6M is lower than W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s net income of $479M. Notably, Global Industrial Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.22x while W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s PE ratio is 31.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Industrial Co. is 0.92x versus 3.01x for W.W. Grainger, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Otter Tail Corp. has a net margin of 5.26% compared to Global Industrial Co.'s net margin of 16.8%. Global Industrial Co.'s return on equity of 22.9% beat Otter Tail Corp.'s return on equity of 15.58%.

Global Industrial Co. has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.71%. On the other hand Otter Tail Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $83.00 which suggests that it could fall by -2.3%. Given that Global Industrial Co. has higher upside potential than Otter Tail Corp., analysts believe Global Industrial Co. is more attractive than Otter Tail Corp..

Global Industrial Co. has a beta of 0.902, which suggesting that the stock is 9.844% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Otter Tail Corp. has a beta of 0.548, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.167%.

Global Industrial Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. Otter Tail Corp. offers a yield of 2.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Global Industrial Co. pays 63.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Otter Tail Corp. pays out 32.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Industrial Co. quarterly revenues are $353.6M, which are larger than Otter Tail Corp. quarterly revenues of $308.1M. Global Industrial Co.'s net income of $18.6M is lower than Otter Tail Corp.'s net income of $51.8M. Notably, Global Industrial Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.22x while Otter Tail Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Industrial Co. is 0.92x versus 2.74x for Otter Tail Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryerson Holding Corp. has a net margin of 5.26% compared to Global Industrial Co.'s net margin of -3.39%. Global Industrial Co.'s return on equity of 22.9% beat Ryerson Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -6.85%.

Global Industrial Co. has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.71%. On the other hand Ryerson Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.68%. Given that Global Industrial Co. has higher upside potential than Ryerson Holding Corp., analysts believe Global Industrial Co. is more attractive than Ryerson Holding Corp..

Global Industrial Co. has a beta of 0.902, which suggesting that the stock is 9.844% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryerson Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.579, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.884%.

Global Industrial Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. Ryerson Holding Corp. offers a yield of 2.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Global Industrial Co. pays 63.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryerson Holding Corp. pays out 339.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Ryerson Holding Corp.'s is not.

Global Industrial Co. quarterly revenues are $353.6M, which are smaller than Ryerson Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Global Industrial Co.'s net income of $18.6M is higher than Ryerson Holding Corp.'s net income of -$37.5M. Notably, Global Industrial Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.22x while Ryerson Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 36.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Industrial Co. is 0.92x versus 0.20x for Ryerson Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.