FBYD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DXP Enterprises, Inc. has a net margin of -256.83% compared to Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s net margin of 4.21%. Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat DXP Enterprises, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.58%.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DXP Enterprises, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $136.50 which suggests that it could grow by 4.96%. Given that DXP Enterprises, Inc. has higher upside potential than Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc., analysts believe DXP Enterprises, Inc. is more attractive than Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc..

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DXP Enterprises, Inc. has a beta of 0.993, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.66000000000001%.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DXP Enterprises, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DXP Enterprises, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1M, which are smaller than DXP Enterprises, Inc. quarterly revenues of $513.7M. Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s net income of -$10.4M is lower than DXP Enterprises, Inc.'s net income of $21.6M. Notably, Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.48x while DXP Enterprises, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. is 19.72x versus 1.10x for DXP Enterprises, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EVI Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -256.83% compared to Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s net margin of 1.45%. Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat EVI Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.73%.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EVI Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $40.00 which suggests that it could grow by 36.19%. Given that EVI Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc., analysts believe EVI Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc..

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EVI Industries, Inc. has a beta of -0.002, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.168%.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EVI Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1M, which are smaller than EVI Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $108.3M. Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s net income of -$10.4M is lower than EVI Industries, Inc.'s net income of $1.6M. Notably, Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.48x while EVI Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 65.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. is 19.72x versus 0.84x for EVI Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L.B. Foster Co. has a net margin of -256.83% compared to Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s net margin of 3.13%. Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat L.B. Foster Co.'s return on equity of 2.7%.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand L.B. Foster Co. has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could fall by -3.49%. Given that L.B. Foster Co. has higher upside potential than Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc., analysts believe L.B. Foster Co. is more attractive than Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc..

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L.B. Foster Co. has a beta of 1.002, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.21899999999999%.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. L.B. Foster Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. L.B. Foster Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1M, which are smaller than L.B. Foster Co. quarterly revenues of $138.3M. Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s net income of -$10.4M is lower than L.B. Foster Co.'s net income of $4.3M. Notably, Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.48x while L.B. Foster Co.'s PE ratio is 67.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. is 19.72x versus 0.63x for L.B. Foster Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Otter Tail Corp. has a net margin of -256.83% compared to Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s net margin of 24.05%. Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Otter Tail Corp.'s return on equity of 16.17%.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Otter Tail Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $83.00 which suggests that it could fall by -6.91%. Given that Otter Tail Corp. has higher upside potential than Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc., analysts believe Otter Tail Corp. is more attractive than Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc..

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Otter Tail Corp. has a beta of 0.561, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.863%.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Otter Tail Corp. offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Otter Tail Corp. pays out 26.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Otter Tail Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1M, which are smaller than Otter Tail Corp. quarterly revenues of $325.6M. Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s net income of -$10.4M is lower than Otter Tail Corp.'s net income of $78.3M. Notably, Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.48x while Otter Tail Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. is 19.72x versus 2.89x for Otter Tail Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.