FBYD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

KRTL Holding Group, Inc. has a net margin of -256.83% compared to Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s net margin of --. Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat KRTL Holding Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KRTL Holding Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than KRTL Holding Group, Inc., analysts believe Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. is more attractive than KRTL Holding Group, Inc..

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KRTL Holding Group, Inc. has a beta of 2.326, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 132.608%.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KRTL Holding Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KRTL Holding Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1M, which are larger than KRTL Holding Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s net income of -$10.4M is higher than KRTL Holding Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.48x while KRTL Holding Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. is 13.97x versus 3.10x for KRTL Holding Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MVP Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -256.83% compared to Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s net margin of --. Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat MVP Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MVP Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than MVP Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. is more attractive than MVP Holdings, Inc..

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MVP Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 12.524, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1152.356%.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MVP Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MVP Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1M, which are larger than MVP Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s net income of -$10.4M is higher than MVP Holdings, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.48x while MVP Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. is 13.97x versus 0.00x for MVP Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Otter Tail Corp. has a net margin of -256.83% compared to Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s net margin of 16.8%. Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Otter Tail Corp.'s return on equity of 15.58%.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Otter Tail Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $83.00 which suggests that it could fall by -2.3%. Given that Otter Tail Corp. has higher upside potential than Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc., analysts believe Otter Tail Corp. is more attractive than Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc..

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Otter Tail Corp. has a beta of 0.548, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.167%.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Otter Tail Corp. offers a yield of 2.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Otter Tail Corp. pays out 32.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Otter Tail Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1M, which are smaller than Otter Tail Corp. quarterly revenues of $308.1M. Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s net income of -$10.4M is lower than Otter Tail Corp.'s net income of $51.8M. Notably, Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.48x while Otter Tail Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. is 13.97x versus 2.74x for Otter Tail Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wanderport has a net margin of -256.83% compared to Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s net margin of --. Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Wanderport's return on equity of --.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wanderport has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than Wanderport, analysts believe Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. is more attractive than Wanderport.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wanderport has a beta of -2.096, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 309.623%.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wanderport offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wanderport pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1M, which are larger than Wanderport quarterly revenues of --. Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s net income of -$10.4M is higher than Wanderport's net income of --. Notably, Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.48x while Wanderport's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Falcon’s Beyond Global, Inc. is 13.97x versus -- for Wanderport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.