RYI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DXP Enterprises, Inc. has a net margin of -1.24% compared to Ryerson Holding Corp.'s net margin of 4.21%. Ryerson Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -2.66% beat DXP Enterprises, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.58%.

Ryerson Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $26.00, signalling downside risk potential of -7.9%. On the other hand DXP Enterprises, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $136.50 which suggests that it could grow by 19.61%. Given that DXP Enterprises, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ryerson Holding Corp., analysts believe DXP Enterprises, Inc. is more attractive than Ryerson Holding Corp..

Ryerson Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.595, which suggesting that the stock is 59.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DXP Enterprises, Inc. has a beta of 0.993, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.66000000000001%.

Ryerson Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.66%. DXP Enterprises, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ryerson Holding Corp. pays 339.73% of its earnings as a dividend. DXP Enterprises, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ryerson Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than DXP Enterprises, Inc. quarterly revenues of $513.7M. Ryerson Holding Corp.'s net income of -$14.4M is lower than DXP Enterprises, Inc.'s net income of $21.6M. Notably, Ryerson Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 36.43x while DXP Enterprises, Inc.'s PE ratio is 21.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryerson Holding Corp. is 0.20x versus 0.96x for DXP Enterprises, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EVI Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -1.24% compared to Ryerson Holding Corp.'s net margin of 1.45%. Ryerson Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -2.66% beat EVI Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.73%.

Ryerson Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $26.00, signalling downside risk potential of -7.9%. On the other hand EVI Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $40.00 which suggests that it could grow by 34.2%. Given that EVI Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ryerson Holding Corp., analysts believe EVI Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Ryerson Holding Corp..

Ryerson Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.595, which suggesting that the stock is 59.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EVI Industries, Inc. has a beta of -0.002, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.168%.

Ryerson Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.66%. EVI Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Ryerson Holding Corp. pays 339.73% of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ryerson Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than EVI Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $108.3M. Ryerson Holding Corp.'s net income of -$14.4M is lower than EVI Industries, Inc.'s net income of $1.6M. Notably, Ryerson Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 36.43x while EVI Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 66.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryerson Holding Corp. is 0.20x versus 0.86x for EVI Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L.B. Foster Co. has a net margin of -1.24% compared to Ryerson Holding Corp.'s net margin of 3.13%. Ryerson Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -2.66% beat L.B. Foster Co.'s return on equity of 2.7%.

Ryerson Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $26.00, signalling downside risk potential of -7.9%. On the other hand L.B. Foster Co. has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.11%. Given that L.B. Foster Co. has higher upside potential than Ryerson Holding Corp., analysts believe L.B. Foster Co. is more attractive than Ryerson Holding Corp..

Ryerson Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.595, which suggesting that the stock is 59.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L.B. Foster Co. has a beta of 1.002, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.21899999999999%.

Ryerson Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.66%. L.B. Foster Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ryerson Holding Corp. pays 339.73% of its earnings as a dividend. L.B. Foster Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ryerson Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than L.B. Foster Co. quarterly revenues of $138.3M. Ryerson Holding Corp.'s net income of -$14.4M is lower than L.B. Foster Co.'s net income of $4.3M. Notably, Ryerson Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 36.43x while L.B. Foster Co.'s PE ratio is 64.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryerson Holding Corp. is 0.20x versus 0.60x for L.B. Foster Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Industrial Co. has a net margin of -1.24% compared to Ryerson Holding Corp.'s net margin of 5.26%. Ryerson Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -2.66% beat Global Industrial Co.'s return on equity of 22.9%.

Ryerson Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of $26.00, signalling downside risk potential of -7.9%. On the other hand Global Industrial Co. has an analysts' consensus of $38.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.18%. Given that Global Industrial Co. has higher upside potential than Ryerson Holding Corp., analysts believe Global Industrial Co. is more attractive than Ryerson Holding Corp..

Ryerson Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.595, which suggesting that the stock is 59.452% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Industrial Co. has a beta of 0.883, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.655%.

Ryerson Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.66%. Global Industrial Co. offers a yield of 3.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Ryerson Holding Corp. pays 339.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial Co. pays out 63.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Ryerson Holding Corp.'s is not.

Ryerson Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Global Industrial Co. quarterly revenues of $353.6M. Ryerson Holding Corp.'s net income of -$14.4M is lower than Global Industrial Co.'s net income of $18.6M. Notably, Ryerson Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 36.43x while Global Industrial Co.'s PE ratio is 17.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryerson Holding Corp. is 0.20x versus 0.89x for Global Industrial Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.