RYI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EVI Industries has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Ryerson Holding's net margin of 1.22%. Ryerson Holding's return on equity of -0.99% beat EVI Industries's return on equity of 5.46%.

Ryerson Holding has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.12%. On the other hand EVI Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ryerson Holding has higher upside potential than EVI Industries, analysts believe Ryerson Holding is more attractive than EVI Industries.

Ryerson Holding has a beta of 1.531, which suggesting that the stock is 53.084% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EVI Industries has a beta of 0.309, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.124%.

Ryerson Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. EVI Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Ryerson Holding pays -288.37% of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries pays out 72.1% of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ryerson Holding quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than EVI Industries quarterly revenues of $92.7M. Ryerson Holding's net income of -$4.3M is lower than EVI Industries's net income of $1.1M. Notably, Ryerson Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.43x while EVI Industries's PE ratio is 39.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryerson Holding is 0.17x versus 0.68x for EVI Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L.B. Foster has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Ryerson Holding's net margin of -0.19%. Ryerson Holding's return on equity of -0.99% beat L.B. Foster's return on equity of 26.94%.

Ryerson Holding has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.12%. On the other hand L.B. Foster has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 40.91%. Given that L.B. Foster has higher upside potential than Ryerson Holding, analysts believe L.B. Foster is more attractive than Ryerson Holding.

Ryerson Holding has a beta of 1.531, which suggesting that the stock is 53.084% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L.B. Foster has a beta of 0.966, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.355%.

Ryerson Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. L.B. Foster offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ryerson Holding pays -288.37% of its earnings as a dividend. L.B. Foster pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ryerson Holding quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than L.B. Foster quarterly revenues of $128.2M. Ryerson Holding's net income of -$4.3M is lower than L.B. Foster's net income of -$242K. Notably, Ryerson Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.43x while L.B. Foster's PE ratio is 5.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryerson Holding is 0.17x versus 0.43x for L.B. Foster. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Industrial has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Ryerson Holding's net margin of 3.54%. Ryerson Holding's return on equity of -0.99% beat Global Industrial's return on equity of 22.66%.

Ryerson Holding has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.12%. On the other hand Global Industrial has an analysts' consensus of $38.00 which suggests that it could grow by 63.44%. Given that Global Industrial has higher upside potential than Ryerson Holding, analysts believe Global Industrial is more attractive than Ryerson Holding.

Ryerson Holding has a beta of 1.531, which suggesting that the stock is 53.084% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Industrial has a beta of 0.853, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.723%.

Ryerson Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. Global Industrial offers a yield of 4.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Ryerson Holding pays -288.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial pays out 62.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ryerson Holding quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Global Industrial quarterly revenues of $302.3M. Ryerson Holding's net income of -$4.3M is lower than Global Industrial's net income of $10.7M. Notably, Ryerson Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.43x while Global Industrial's PE ratio is 14.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryerson Holding is 0.17x versus 0.68x for Global Industrial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Transcat has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Ryerson Holding's net margin of 3.53%. Ryerson Holding's return on equity of -0.99% beat Transcat's return on equity of 6.75%.

Ryerson Holding has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 4.12%. On the other hand Transcat has an analysts' consensus of $100.15 which suggests that it could grow by 37.33%. Given that Transcat has higher upside potential than Ryerson Holding, analysts believe Transcat is more attractive than Ryerson Holding.

Ryerson Holding has a beta of 1.531, which suggesting that the stock is 53.084% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Transcat has a beta of 0.662, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.82%.

Ryerson Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. Transcat offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ryerson Holding pays -288.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Transcat pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ryerson Holding quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Transcat quarterly revenues of $66.8M. Ryerson Holding's net income of -$4.3M is lower than Transcat's net income of $2.4M. Notably, Ryerson Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.43x while Transcat's PE ratio is 38.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ryerson Holding is 0.17x versus 2.46x for Transcat. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.