FSTR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Global Industrial Co. has a net margin of 3.13% compared to L.B. Foster Co.'s net margin of 5.26%. L.B. Foster Co.'s return on equity of 2.7% beat Global Industrial Co.'s return on equity of 22.9%.

L.B. Foster Co. has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling downside risk potential of -3.23%. On the other hand Global Industrial Co. has an analysts' consensus of $38.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.71%. Given that Global Industrial Co. has higher upside potential than L.B. Foster Co., analysts believe Global Industrial Co. is more attractive than L.B. Foster Co..

L.B. Foster Co. has a beta of 1.006, which suggesting that the stock is 0.61899999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Industrial Co. has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.844%.

L.B. Foster Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Industrial Co. offers a yield of 3.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. L.B. Foster Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial Co. pays out 63.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

L.B. Foster Co. quarterly revenues are $138.3M, which are smaller than Global Industrial Co. quarterly revenues of $353.6M. L.B. Foster Co.'s net income of $4.3M is lower than Global Industrial Co.'s net income of $18.6M. Notably, L.B. Foster Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 69.98x while Global Industrial Co.'s PE ratio is 18.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L.B. Foster Co. is 0.65x versus 0.92x for Global Industrial Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Masco Corp. has a net margin of 3.13% compared to L.B. Foster Co.'s net margin of 9.82%. L.B. Foster Co.'s return on equity of 2.7% beat Masco Corp.'s return on equity of 1286.79%.

L.B. Foster Co. has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling downside risk potential of -3.23%. On the other hand Masco Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $80.32 which suggests that it could grow by 6.87%. Given that Masco Corp. has higher upside potential than L.B. Foster Co., analysts believe Masco Corp. is more attractive than L.B. Foster Co..

L.B. Foster Co. has a beta of 1.006, which suggesting that the stock is 0.61899999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Masco Corp. has a beta of 1.282, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.246%.

L.B. Foster Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Masco Corp. offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. L.B. Foster Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Masco Corp. pays out 31.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Masco Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

L.B. Foster Co. quarterly revenues are $138.3M, which are smaller than Masco Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. L.B. Foster Co.'s net income of $4.3M is lower than Masco Corp.'s net income of $176M. Notably, L.B. Foster Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 69.98x while Masco Corp.'s PE ratio is 19.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L.B. Foster Co. is 0.65x versus 2.09x for Masco Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Otter Tail Corp. has a net margin of 3.13% compared to L.B. Foster Co.'s net margin of 16.8%. L.B. Foster Co.'s return on equity of 2.7% beat Otter Tail Corp.'s return on equity of 15.58%.

L.B. Foster Co. has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling downside risk potential of -3.23%. On the other hand Otter Tail Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $83.00 which suggests that it could fall by -2.3%. Given that L.B. Foster Co. has more downside risk than Otter Tail Corp., analysts believe Otter Tail Corp. is more attractive than L.B. Foster Co..

L.B. Foster Co. has a beta of 1.006, which suggesting that the stock is 0.61899999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Otter Tail Corp. has a beta of 0.548, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.167%.

L.B. Foster Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Otter Tail Corp. offers a yield of 2.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. L.B. Foster Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Otter Tail Corp. pays out 32.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Otter Tail Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

L.B. Foster Co. quarterly revenues are $138.3M, which are smaller than Otter Tail Corp. quarterly revenues of $308.1M. L.B. Foster Co.'s net income of $4.3M is lower than Otter Tail Corp.'s net income of $51.8M. Notably, L.B. Foster Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 69.98x while Otter Tail Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L.B. Foster Co. is 0.65x versus 2.74x for Otter Tail Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryerson Holding Corp. has a net margin of 3.13% compared to L.B. Foster Co.'s net margin of -3.39%. L.B. Foster Co.'s return on equity of 2.7% beat Ryerson Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -6.85%.

L.B. Foster Co. has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling downside risk potential of -3.23%. On the other hand Ryerson Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.68%. Given that Ryerson Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than L.B. Foster Co., analysts believe Ryerson Holding Corp. is more attractive than L.B. Foster Co..

L.B. Foster Co. has a beta of 1.006, which suggesting that the stock is 0.61899999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryerson Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.579, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.884%.

L.B. Foster Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryerson Holding Corp. offers a yield of 2.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. L.B. Foster Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryerson Holding Corp. pays out 339.73% of its earnings as a dividend.

L.B. Foster Co. quarterly revenues are $138.3M, which are smaller than Ryerson Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. L.B. Foster Co.'s net income of $4.3M is higher than Ryerson Holding Corp.'s net income of -$37.5M. Notably, L.B. Foster Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 69.98x while Ryerson Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 36.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L.B. Foster Co. is 0.65x versus 0.20x for Ryerson Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.