FSTR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EVI Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 3.13% compared to L.B. Foster Co.'s net margin of 1.45%. L.B. Foster Co.'s return on equity of 2.7% beat EVI Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.73%.

L.B. Foster Co. has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.91%. On the other hand EVI Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $40.00 which suggests that it could grow by 39.83%. Given that EVI Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than L.B. Foster Co., analysts believe EVI Industries, Inc. is more attractive than L.B. Foster Co..

L.B. Foster Co. has a beta of 0.999, which suggesting that the stock is 0.075999999999998% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EVI Industries, Inc. has a beta of -0.009, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.879%.

L.B. Foster Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EVI Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. L.B. Foster Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

L.B. Foster Co. quarterly revenues are $138.3M, which are larger than EVI Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $108.3M. L.B. Foster Co.'s net income of $4.3M is higher than EVI Industries, Inc.'s net income of $1.6M. Notably, L.B. Foster Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 63.61x while EVI Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 63.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L.B. Foster Co. is 0.60x versus 0.82x for EVI Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Industrial Co. has a net margin of 3.13% compared to L.B. Foster Co.'s net margin of 5.26%. L.B. Foster Co.'s return on equity of 2.7% beat Global Industrial Co.'s return on equity of 22.9%.

L.B. Foster Co. has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.91%. On the other hand Global Industrial Co. has an analysts' consensus of $38.00 which suggests that it could grow by 27.18%. Given that Global Industrial Co. has higher upside potential than L.B. Foster Co., analysts believe Global Industrial Co. is more attractive than L.B. Foster Co..

L.B. Foster Co. has a beta of 0.999, which suggesting that the stock is 0.075999999999998% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Industrial Co. has a beta of 0.933, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.73%.

L.B. Foster Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Industrial Co. offers a yield of 3.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. L.B. Foster Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial Co. pays out 63.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

L.B. Foster Co. quarterly revenues are $138.3M, which are smaller than Global Industrial Co. quarterly revenues of $353.6M. L.B. Foster Co.'s net income of $4.3M is lower than Global Industrial Co.'s net income of $18.6M. Notably, L.B. Foster Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 63.61x while Global Industrial Co.'s PE ratio is 17.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L.B. Foster Co. is 0.60x versus 0.86x for Global Industrial Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryerson Holding Corp. has a net margin of 3.13% compared to L.B. Foster Co.'s net margin of -1.24%. L.B. Foster Co.'s return on equity of 2.7% beat Ryerson Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -2.66%.

L.B. Foster Co. has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.91%. On the other hand Ryerson Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $26.00 which suggests that it could fall by -0.69%. Given that L.B. Foster Co. has higher upside potential than Ryerson Holding Corp., analysts believe L.B. Foster Co. is more attractive than Ryerson Holding Corp..

L.B. Foster Co. has a beta of 0.999, which suggesting that the stock is 0.075999999999998% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryerson Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.651, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.147%.

L.B. Foster Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryerson Holding Corp. offers a yield of 2.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. L.B. Foster Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryerson Holding Corp. pays out 339.73% of its earnings as a dividend.

L.B. Foster Co. quarterly revenues are $138.3M, which are smaller than Ryerson Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. L.B. Foster Co.'s net income of $4.3M is higher than Ryerson Holding Corp.'s net income of -$14.4M. Notably, L.B. Foster Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 63.61x while Ryerson Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is 36.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L.B. Foster Co. is 0.60x versus 0.19x for Ryerson Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Watsco, Inc. has a net margin of 3.13% compared to L.B. Foster Co.'s net margin of 8.64%. L.B. Foster Co.'s return on equity of 2.7% beat Watsco, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.28%.

L.B. Foster Co. has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.91%. On the other hand Watsco, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $406.60 which suggests that it could grow by 16.91%. Given that Watsco, Inc. has higher upside potential than L.B. Foster Co., analysts believe Watsco, Inc. is more attractive than L.B. Foster Co..

L.B. Foster Co. has a beta of 0.999, which suggesting that the stock is 0.075999999999998% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Watsco, Inc. has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.675%.

L.B. Foster Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Watsco, Inc. offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. L.B. Foster Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Watsco, Inc. pays out 81.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Watsco, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

L.B. Foster Co. quarterly revenues are $138.3M, which are smaller than Watsco, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. L.B. Foster Co.'s net income of $4.3M is lower than Watsco, Inc.'s net income of $178.5M. Notably, L.B. Foster Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 63.61x while Watsco, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L.B. Foster Co. is 0.60x versus 1.78x for Watsco, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.