LICY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Eos Energy Enterprises has a net margin of -97.62% compared to Li-Cycle Holdings's net margin of -40148.24%. Li-Cycle Holdings's return on equity of -43.81% beat Eos Energy Enterprises's return on equity of --.

Li-Cycle Holdings has a consensus price target of $2.63, signalling downside risk potential of -1.32%. On the other hand Eos Energy Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $4.57 which suggests that it could fall by -15.19%. Given that Eos Energy Enterprises has more downside risk than Li-Cycle Holdings, analysts believe Li-Cycle Holdings is more attractive than Eos Energy Enterprises.

Li-Cycle Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eos Energy Enterprises has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Li-Cycle Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Eos Energy Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Li-Cycle Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eos Energy Enterprises pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Li-Cycle Holdings quarterly revenues are $8.4M, which are larger than Eos Energy Enterprises quarterly revenues of $854K. Li-Cycle Holdings's net income of $56.5M is higher than Eos Energy Enterprises's net income of -$342.9M. Notably, Li-Cycle Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eos Energy Enterprises's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Li-Cycle Holdings is 1.94x versus 71.56x for Eos Energy Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EVI Industries has a net margin of -97.62% compared to Li-Cycle Holdings's net margin of 3.45%. Li-Cycle Holdings's return on equity of -43.81% beat EVI Industries's return on equity of 5.65%.

Li-Cycle Holdings has a consensus price target of $2.63, signalling downside risk potential of -1.32%. On the other hand EVI Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Li-Cycle Holdings has higher upside potential than EVI Industries, analysts believe Li-Cycle Holdings is more attractive than EVI Industries.

Li-Cycle Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EVI Industries has a beta of 0.395, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.521%.

Li-Cycle Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EVI Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Li-Cycle Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries pays out 72.1% of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Li-Cycle Holdings quarterly revenues are $8.4M, which are smaller than EVI Industries quarterly revenues of $93.6M. Li-Cycle Holdings's net income of $56.5M is higher than EVI Industries's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Li-Cycle Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EVI Industries's PE ratio is 34.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Li-Cycle Holdings is 1.94x versus 0.62x for EVI Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Greenwave Technology Solutions has a net margin of -97.62% compared to Li-Cycle Holdings's net margin of -56.41%. Li-Cycle Holdings's return on equity of -43.81% beat Greenwave Technology Solutions's return on equity of -44.78%.

Li-Cycle Holdings has a consensus price target of $2.63, signalling downside risk potential of -1.32%. On the other hand Greenwave Technology Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Li-Cycle Holdings has higher upside potential than Greenwave Technology Solutions, analysts believe Li-Cycle Holdings is more attractive than Greenwave Technology Solutions.

Li-Cycle Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenwave Technology Solutions has a beta of 1.347, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.675%.

Li-Cycle Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Greenwave Technology Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Li-Cycle Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greenwave Technology Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Li-Cycle Holdings quarterly revenues are $8.4M, which are smaller than Greenwave Technology Solutions quarterly revenues of $8.5M. Li-Cycle Holdings's net income of $56.5M is higher than Greenwave Technology Solutions's net income of -$4.8M. Notably, Li-Cycle Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Greenwave Technology Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Li-Cycle Holdings is 1.94x versus 0.13x for Greenwave Technology Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Susglobal Energy has a net margin of -97.62% compared to Li-Cycle Holdings's net margin of -3955.27%. Li-Cycle Holdings's return on equity of -43.81% beat Susglobal Energy's return on equity of --.

Li-Cycle Holdings has a consensus price target of $2.63, signalling downside risk potential of -1.32%. On the other hand Susglobal Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Li-Cycle Holdings has higher upside potential than Susglobal Energy, analysts believe Li-Cycle Holdings is more attractive than Susglobal Energy.

Li-Cycle Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Susglobal Energy has a beta of 1.317, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.707%.

Li-Cycle Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Susglobal Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Li-Cycle Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Susglobal Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Li-Cycle Holdings quarterly revenues are $8.4M, which are larger than Susglobal Energy quarterly revenues of $38.6K. Li-Cycle Holdings's net income of $56.5M is higher than Susglobal Energy's net income of $256.9K. Notably, Li-Cycle Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Susglobal Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Li-Cycle Holdings is 1.94x versus 5.13x for Susglobal Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.