EOSE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -4367.09% compared to Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.'s net margin of 9.83%. Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.5%.

Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.13, signalling upside risk potential of 10.14%. On the other hand Hayward Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.86 which suggests that it could grow by 10.64%. Given that Hayward Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc., analysts believe Hayward Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc..

Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. has a beta of 2.112, which suggesting that the stock is 111.245% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hayward Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hayward Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. quarterly revenues are $30.5M, which are smaller than Hayward Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $244.3M. Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.'s net income of -$1.3B is lower than Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $24M. Notably, Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is 67.16x versus 3.26x for Hayward Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Masco Corp. has a net margin of -4367.09% compared to Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.'s net margin of 10.43%. Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Masco Corp.'s return on equity of 1092.5%.

Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.13, signalling upside risk potential of 10.14%. On the other hand Masco Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $74.47 which suggests that it could grow by 12.69%. Given that Masco Corp. has higher upside potential than Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc., analysts believe Masco Corp. is more attractive than Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc..

Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. has a beta of 2.112, which suggesting that the stock is 111.245% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Masco Corp. has a beta of 1.279, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.94%.

Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Masco Corp. offers a yield of 1.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Masco Corp. pays out 31.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Masco Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. quarterly revenues are $30.5M, which are smaller than Masco Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.'s net income of -$1.3B is lower than Masco Corp.'s net income of $200M. Notably, Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Masco Corp.'s PE ratio is 16.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is 67.16x versus 1.84x for Masco Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solidion Technology, Inc. has a net margin of -4367.09% compared to Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.'s net margin of -43532.98%. Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Solidion Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.13, signalling upside risk potential of 10.14%. On the other hand Solidion Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. has higher upside potential than Solidion Technology, Inc., analysts believe Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is more attractive than Solidion Technology, Inc..

Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. has a beta of 2.112, which suggesting that the stock is 111.245% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solidion Technology, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solidion Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solidion Technology, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. quarterly revenues are $30.5M, which are larger than Solidion Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $9.4K. Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.'s net income of -$1.3B is lower than Solidion Technology, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solidion Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 0.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is 67.16x versus 1,565.81x for Solidion Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. has a net margin of -4367.09% compared to Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.'s net margin of --. Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.72%.

Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.13, signalling upside risk potential of 10.14%. On the other hand Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc., analysts believe Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is more attractive than Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc..

Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. has a beta of 2.112, which suggesting that the stock is 111.245% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. quarterly revenues are $30.5M, which are larger than Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.'s net income of -$1.3B is lower than Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s net income of -$14.3K. Notably, Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is 67.16x versus 1,507.63x for Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.