HAYW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

W.W. Grainger, Inc. has a net margin of 9.83% compared to Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 6.89%. Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.5% beat W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s return on equity of 46.94%.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.86, signalling upside risk potential of 10.64%. On the other hand W.W. Grainger, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1,082.06 which suggests that it could grow by 0.2%. Given that Hayward Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than W.W. Grainger, Inc., analysts believe Hayward Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than W.W. Grainger, Inc..

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W.W. Grainger, Inc. has a beta of 1.125, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.474%.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. W.W. Grainger, Inc. offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share. Hayward Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger, Inc. pays out 20.56% of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $244.3M, which are smaller than W.W. Grainger, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $24M is lower than W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s net income of $321M. Notably, Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.98x while W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hayward Holdings, Inc. is 3.26x versus 2.94x for W.W. Grainger, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Masco Corp. has a net margin of 9.83% compared to Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 10.43%. Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.5% beat Masco Corp.'s return on equity of 1092.5%.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.86, signalling upside risk potential of 10.64%. On the other hand Masco Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $74.47 which suggests that it could grow by 12.69%. Given that Masco Corp. has higher upside potential than Hayward Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Masco Corp. is more attractive than Hayward Holdings, Inc..

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Masco Corp. has a beta of 1.279, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.94%.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Masco Corp. offers a yield of 1.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Hayward Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Masco Corp. pays out 31.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Masco Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $244.3M, which are smaller than Masco Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $24M is lower than Masco Corp.'s net income of $200M. Notably, Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.98x while Masco Corp.'s PE ratio is 16.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hayward Holdings, Inc. is 3.26x versus 1.84x for Masco Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solidion Technology, Inc. has a net margin of 9.83% compared to Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -43532.98%. Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.5% beat Solidion Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.86, signalling upside risk potential of 10.64%. On the other hand Solidion Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hayward Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Solidion Technology, Inc., analysts believe Hayward Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Solidion Technology, Inc..

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solidion Technology, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solidion Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hayward Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solidion Technology, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $244.3M, which are larger than Solidion Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $9.4K. Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $24M is higher than Solidion Technology, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.98x while Solidion Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 0.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hayward Holdings, Inc. is 3.26x versus 1,565.81x for Solidion Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. has a net margin of 9.83% compared to Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.5% beat Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.72%.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.86, signalling upside risk potential of 10.64%. On the other hand Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hayward Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc., analysts believe Hayward Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc..

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hayward Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $244.3M, which are larger than Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $24M is higher than Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s net income of -$14.3K. Notably, Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.98x while Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hayward Holdings, Inc. is 3.26x versus 1,507.63x for Nuclear Diamond Batteries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.