HAYW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

W.W. Grainger, Inc. has a net margin of 9.83% compared to Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 6.89%. Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.5% beat W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s return on equity of 46.94%.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.93, signalling upside risk potential of 11.06%. On the other hand W.W. Grainger, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1,053.47 which suggests that it could grow by 2.21%. Given that Hayward Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than W.W. Grainger, Inc., analysts believe Hayward Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than W.W. Grainger, Inc..

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W.W. Grainger, Inc. has a beta of 1.115, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.463%.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. W.W. Grainger, Inc. offers a yield of 0.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share. Hayward Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger, Inc. pays out 20.56% of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $244.3M, which are smaller than W.W. Grainger, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $24M is lower than W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s net income of $321M. Notably, Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.67x while W.W. Grainger, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hayward Holdings, Inc. is 3.22x versus 2.80x for W.W. Grainger, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Masco Corp. has a net margin of 9.83% compared to Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 10.43%. Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.5% beat Masco Corp.'s return on equity of 1092.5%.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.93, signalling upside risk potential of 11.06%. On the other hand Masco Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $74.26 which suggests that it could grow by 14.69%. Given that Masco Corp. has higher upside potential than Hayward Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Masco Corp. is more attractive than Hayward Holdings, Inc..

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Masco Corp. has a beta of 1.274, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.391%.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Masco Corp. offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Hayward Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Masco Corp. pays out 31.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Masco Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $244.3M, which are smaller than Masco Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $24M is lower than Masco Corp.'s net income of $200M. Notably, Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.67x while Masco Corp.'s PE ratio is 16.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hayward Holdings, Inc. is 3.22x versus 1.81x for Masco Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solidion Technology, Inc. has a net margin of 9.83% compared to Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -43532.98%. Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.5% beat Solidion Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.93, signalling upside risk potential of 11.06%. On the other hand Solidion Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hayward Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Solidion Technology, Inc., analysts believe Hayward Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Solidion Technology, Inc..

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solidion Technology, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solidion Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hayward Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solidion Technology, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $244.3M, which are larger than Solidion Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $9.4K. Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $24M is higher than Solidion Technology, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.67x while Solidion Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 0.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hayward Holdings, Inc. is 3.22x versus 1,458.71x for Solidion Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WESCO International, Inc. has a net margin of 9.83% compared to Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 3.04%. Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.5% beat WESCO International, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.15%.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $16.93, signalling upside risk potential of 11.06%. On the other hand WESCO International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $287.75 which suggests that it could grow by 12.98%. Given that WESCO International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hayward Holdings, Inc., analysts believe WESCO International, Inc. is more attractive than Hayward Holdings, Inc..

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WESCO International, Inc. has a beta of 1.474, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.428%.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WESCO International, Inc. offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Hayward Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International, Inc. pays out 12.65% of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $244.3M, which are smaller than WESCO International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.2B. Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $24M is lower than WESCO International, Inc.'s net income of $188.6M. Notably, Hayward Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.67x while WESCO International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 19.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hayward Holdings, Inc. is 3.22x versus 0.55x for WESCO International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.