SNRG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Beacon Roofing Supply has a net margin of -3955.27% compared to Susglobal Energy's net margin of 5.24%. Susglobal Energy's return on equity of -- beat Beacon Roofing Supply's return on equity of 20.59%.

Susglobal Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Beacon Roofing Supply has an analysts' consensus of $116.18 which suggests that it could grow by 13.82%. Given that Beacon Roofing Supply has higher upside potential than Susglobal Energy, analysts believe Beacon Roofing Supply is more attractive than Susglobal Energy.

Susglobal Energy has a beta of 1.317, which suggesting that the stock is 31.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Beacon Roofing Supply has a beta of 1.606, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.564%.

Susglobal Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Beacon Roofing Supply offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Susglobal Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Beacon Roofing Supply pays out 4.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Beacon Roofing Supply's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Susglobal Energy quarterly revenues are $38.6K, which are smaller than Beacon Roofing Supply quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Susglobal Energy's net income of $256.9K is lower than Beacon Roofing Supply's net income of $145.3M. Notably, Susglobal Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Beacon Roofing Supply's PE ratio is 17.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Susglobal Energy is 5.13x versus 0.68x for Beacon Roofing Supply. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EVI Industries has a net margin of -3955.27% compared to Susglobal Energy's net margin of 3.45%. Susglobal Energy's return on equity of -- beat EVI Industries's return on equity of 5.65%.

Susglobal Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EVI Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Susglobal Energy has higher upside potential than EVI Industries, analysts believe Susglobal Energy is more attractive than EVI Industries.

Susglobal Energy has a beta of 1.317, which suggesting that the stock is 31.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EVI Industries has a beta of 0.395, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.521%.

Susglobal Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EVI Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Susglobal Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries pays out 72.1% of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Susglobal Energy quarterly revenues are $38.6K, which are smaller than EVI Industries quarterly revenues of $93.6M. Susglobal Energy's net income of $256.9K is lower than EVI Industries's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Susglobal Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EVI Industries's PE ratio is 34.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Susglobal Energy is 5.13x versus 0.62x for EVI Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Greenwave Technology Solutions has a net margin of -3955.27% compared to Susglobal Energy's net margin of -56.41%. Susglobal Energy's return on equity of -- beat Greenwave Technology Solutions's return on equity of -44.78%.

Susglobal Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Greenwave Technology Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Susglobal Energy has higher upside potential than Greenwave Technology Solutions, analysts believe Susglobal Energy is more attractive than Greenwave Technology Solutions.

Susglobal Energy has a beta of 1.317, which suggesting that the stock is 31.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenwave Technology Solutions has a beta of 1.347, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.675%.

Susglobal Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Greenwave Technology Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Susglobal Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greenwave Technology Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Susglobal Energy quarterly revenues are $38.6K, which are smaller than Greenwave Technology Solutions quarterly revenues of $8.5M. Susglobal Energy's net income of $256.9K is higher than Greenwave Technology Solutions's net income of -$4.8M. Notably, Susglobal Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Greenwave Technology Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Susglobal Energy is 5.13x versus 0.13x for Greenwave Technology Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Li-Cycle Holdings has a net margin of -3955.27% compared to Susglobal Energy's net margin of -97.62%. Susglobal Energy's return on equity of -- beat Li-Cycle Holdings's return on equity of -43.81%.

Susglobal Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Li-Cycle Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $2.63 which suggests that it could fall by -1.32%. Given that Li-Cycle Holdings has higher upside potential than Susglobal Energy, analysts believe Li-Cycle Holdings is more attractive than Susglobal Energy.

Susglobal Energy has a beta of 1.317, which suggesting that the stock is 31.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li-Cycle Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Susglobal Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Li-Cycle Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Susglobal Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Li-Cycle Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Susglobal Energy quarterly revenues are $38.6K, which are smaller than Li-Cycle Holdings quarterly revenues of $8.4M. Susglobal Energy's net income of $256.9K is lower than Li-Cycle Holdings's net income of $56.5M. Notably, Susglobal Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Li-Cycle Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Susglobal Energy is 5.13x versus 1.94x for Li-Cycle Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.