AGXXF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EVI Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Agilyx ASA's net margin of 1.45%. Agilyx ASA's return on equity of 119.83% beat EVI Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.73%.

Agilyx ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EVI Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $40.00 which suggests that it could grow by 53.11%. Given that EVI Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Agilyx ASA, analysts believe EVI Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Agilyx ASA.

Agilyx ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EVI Industries, Inc. has a beta of -0.009, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.879%.

Agilyx ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EVI Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Agilyx ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Agilyx ASA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than EVI Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $108.3M. Agilyx ASA's net income of -- is lower than EVI Industries, Inc.'s net income of $1.6M. Notably, Agilyx ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.83x while EVI Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 58.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agilyx ASA is 274.84x versus 0.75x for EVI Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L.B. Foster Co. has a net margin of -- compared to Agilyx ASA's net margin of 3.13%. Agilyx ASA's return on equity of 119.83% beat L.B. Foster Co.'s return on equity of 2.7%.

Agilyx ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand L.B. Foster Co. has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.61%. Given that L.B. Foster Co. has higher upside potential than Agilyx ASA, analysts believe L.B. Foster Co. is more attractive than Agilyx ASA.

Agilyx ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L.B. Foster Co. has a beta of 0.999, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.075999999999998%.

Agilyx ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. L.B. Foster Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Agilyx ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. L.B. Foster Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Agilyx ASA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than L.B. Foster Co. quarterly revenues of $138.3M. Agilyx ASA's net income of -- is lower than L.B. Foster Co.'s net income of $4.3M. Notably, Agilyx ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.83x while L.B. Foster Co.'s PE ratio is 60.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agilyx ASA is 274.84x versus 0.56x for L.B. Foster Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Greenwave Technology Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Agilyx ASA's net margin of -56.41%. Agilyx ASA's return on equity of 119.83% beat Greenwave Technology Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of -44.78%.

Agilyx ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Greenwave Technology Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Agilyx ASA has higher upside potential than Greenwave Technology Solutions, Inc., analysts believe Agilyx ASA is more attractive than Greenwave Technology Solutions, Inc..

Agilyx ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenwave Technology Solutions, Inc. has a beta of -0.157, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.708%.

Agilyx ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Greenwave Technology Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Agilyx ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greenwave Technology Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Agilyx ASA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Greenwave Technology Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.5M. Agilyx ASA's net income of -- is lower than Greenwave Technology Solutions, Inc.'s net income of -$4.8M. Notably, Agilyx ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.83x while Greenwave Technology Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agilyx ASA is 274.84x versus 1.26x for Greenwave Technology Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SusGlobal Energy Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Agilyx ASA's net margin of -3151.92%. Agilyx ASA's return on equity of 119.83% beat SusGlobal Energy Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Agilyx ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SusGlobal Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Agilyx ASA has higher upside potential than SusGlobal Energy Corp., analysts believe Agilyx ASA is more attractive than SusGlobal Energy Corp..

Agilyx ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SusGlobal Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.426, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.389%.

Agilyx ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SusGlobal Energy Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Agilyx ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SusGlobal Energy Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Agilyx ASA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SusGlobal Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Agilyx ASA's net income of -- is lower than SusGlobal Energy Corp.'s net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Agilyx ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.83x while SusGlobal Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Agilyx ASA is 274.84x versus 55.80x for SusGlobal Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.