Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
19
NSRPF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.08
Seasonality move
:
-1.91%
Day range:
$0.08 - $0.09
52-week range:
$0.04 - $0.13
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
6.56x
P/B ratio:
0.60x
Volume:
143.1K
Avg. volume:
221.6K
1-year change:
53.52%
Market cap:
$29.4M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.03
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NSRPF
Novo Resources Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
$4M | -$0.01 | 1.34% | -100% | $4.79 |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
$64.5M | $0.28 | 106.58% | -- | $22.20 |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.03 | -- | -91.18% | $47.03 |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
$60.6M | -- | -51.92% | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NSRPF
Novo Resources Corp.
|
$0.08 | -- | $29.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 6.56x |
|
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
|
$1.87 | -- | $25.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
$4.25 | $4.79 | $838.2M | -- | $0.01 | 0% | 50.10x |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
$18.77 | $22.20 | $1B | 3.42x | $0.00 | 0% | 6.05x |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
$29.94 | $47.03 | $3.1B | 250.29x | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
$0.2500 | -- | $16.9M | 2.02x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.06x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NSRPF
Novo Resources Corp.
|
0.5% | -1.026 | 0.84% | 0.60x |
|
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
|
-- | 1.703 | -- | 43.32x |
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
8.34% | 1.760 | 7.69% | 1.57x |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
20.73% | 1.903 | 13.71% | 1.33x |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
35.61% | 1.696 | 16.75% | 2.67x |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
28.31% | 172.414 | 51.97% | 0.37x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NSRPF
Novo Resources Corp.
|
-$34.1K | -$3.2M | -22.74% | -22.87% | -- | -$2.6M |
|
AUST
Austin Gold Corp.
|
-$700 | -$313.5K | -19.82% | -19.82% | -- | -$934.5K |
|
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
|
$2.8M | $572K | -1.05% | -1.15% | 13.79% | $1.3M |
|
MUX
McEwen, Inc.
|
$102K | -$7.6M | -2.04% | -2.43% | -15.09% | -$5.6M |
|
SA
Seabridge Gold, Inc.
|
-$42.1K | -$3.4M | -3.35% | -5.31% | -- | -$40.1M |
|
VITFF
Victoria Gold Corp.
|
$6.7M | $4.2M | 1.83% | 2.62% | -8.2% | $13.4M |
Novo Resources Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NSRPF or AUST?
Austin Gold Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Novo Resources Corp.'s net margin of --. Novo Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -22.87% beat Austin Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -19.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NSRPFNovo Resources Corp.-- -$0.01 $49.7M AUSTAustin Gold Corp.-- -$0.02 $8.8M -
What do Analysts Say About NSRPF or AUST?
Novo Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Austin Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 60.53%. Given that Austin Gold Corp. has higher upside potential than Novo Resources Corp., analysts believe Austin Gold Corp. is more attractive than Novo Resources Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NSRPFNovo Resources Corp.0 0 0 AUSTAustin Gold Corp.0 0 0 -
Is NSRPF or AUST More Risky?
Novo Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.643, which suggesting that the stock is 35.741% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Austin Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NSRPF or AUST?
Novo Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Austin Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Novo Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Austin Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NSRPF or AUST?
Novo Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Austin Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Novo Resources Corp.'s net income of -$3.3M is lower than Austin Gold Corp.'s net income of -$270.8K. Notably, Novo Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Austin Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Novo Resources Corp. is 6.56x versus -- for Austin Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NSRPFNovo Resources Corp.6.56x -- -- -$3.3M AUSTAustin Gold Corp.-- -- -- -$270.8K
-
Which has Higher Returns NSRPF or GROY?
Gold Royalty Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Novo Resources Corp.'s net margin of -27.31%. Novo Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -22.87% beat Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NSRPFNovo Resources Corp.-- -$0.01 $49.7M GROYGold Royalty Corp.68.47% -$0.01 $610.9M -
What do Analysts Say About NSRPF or GROY?
Novo Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gold Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $4.79 which suggests that it could grow by 12.61%. Given that Gold Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than Novo Resources Corp., analysts believe Gold Royalty Corp. is more attractive than Novo Resources Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NSRPFNovo Resources Corp.0 0 0 GROYGold Royalty Corp.3 0 0 -
Is NSRPF or GROY More Risky?
Novo Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.643, which suggesting that the stock is 35.741% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NSRPF or GROY?
Novo Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Novo Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NSRPF or GROY?
Novo Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. Novo Resources Corp.'s net income of -$3.3M is lower than Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Novo Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Novo Resources Corp. is 6.56x versus 50.10x for Gold Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NSRPFNovo Resources Corp.6.56x -- -- -$3.3M GROYGold Royalty Corp.50.10x -- $4.1M -$1.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns NSRPF or MUX?
McEwen, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Novo Resources Corp.'s net margin of -0.91%. Novo Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -22.87% beat McEwen, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NSRPFNovo Resources Corp.-- -$0.01 $49.7M MUXMcEwen, Inc.0.2% -$0.01 $616.3M -
What do Analysts Say About NSRPF or MUX?
Novo Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand McEwen, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.20 which suggests that it could grow by 18.27%. Given that McEwen, Inc. has higher upside potential than Novo Resources Corp., analysts believe McEwen, Inc. is more attractive than Novo Resources Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NSRPFNovo Resources Corp.0 0 0 MUXMcEwen, Inc.5 0 0 -
Is NSRPF or MUX More Risky?
Novo Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.643, which suggesting that the stock is 35.741% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen, Inc. has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.347%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NSRPF or MUX?
Novo Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McEwen, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Novo Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NSRPF or MUX?
Novo Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than McEwen, Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.5M. Novo Resources Corp.'s net income of -$3.3M is lower than McEwen, Inc.'s net income of -$462K. Notably, Novo Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while McEwen, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Novo Resources Corp. is 6.56x versus 6.05x for McEwen, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NSRPFNovo Resources Corp.6.56x -- -- -$3.3M MUXMcEwen, Inc.6.05x 3.42x $50.5M -$462K
-
Which has Higher Returns NSRPF or SA?
Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Novo Resources Corp.'s net margin of --. Novo Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -22.87% beat Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NSRPFNovo Resources Corp.-- -$0.01 $49.7M SASeabridge Gold, Inc.-- -$0.23 $1.2B -
What do Analysts Say About NSRPF or SA?
Novo Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Seabridge Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $47.03 which suggests that it could grow by 57.09%. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Novo Resources Corp., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Novo Resources Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NSRPFNovo Resources Corp.0 0 0 SASeabridge Gold, Inc.3 0 0 -
Is NSRPF or SA More Risky?
Novo Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.643, which suggesting that the stock is 35.741% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.933%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NSRPF or SA?
Novo Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seabridge Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Novo Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NSRPF or SA?
Novo Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Novo Resources Corp.'s net income of -$3.3M is higher than Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M. Notably, Novo Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Novo Resources Corp. is 6.56x versus -- for Seabridge Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NSRPFNovo Resources Corp.6.56x -- -- -$3.3M SASeabridge Gold, Inc.-- 250.29x -- -$23.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns NSRPF or VITFF?
Victoria Gold Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Novo Resources Corp.'s net margin of -10.81%. Novo Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -22.87% beat Victoria Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 2.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NSRPFNovo Resources Corp.-- -$0.01 $49.7M VITFFVictoria Gold Corp.10.82% -$0.10 $608M -
What do Analysts Say About NSRPF or VITFF?
Novo Resources Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Victoria Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Novo Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than Victoria Gold Corp., analysts believe Novo Resources Corp. is more attractive than Victoria Gold Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NSRPFNovo Resources Corp.0 0 0 VITFFVictoria Gold Corp.0 0 0 -
Is NSRPF or VITFF More Risky?
Novo Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.643, which suggesting that the stock is 35.741% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria Gold Corp. has a beta of 18.710, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1770.964%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NSRPF or VITFF?
Novo Resources Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Victoria Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Novo Resources Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NSRPF or VITFF?
Novo Resources Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Victoria Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $61.5M. Novo Resources Corp.'s net income of -$3.3M is higher than Victoria Gold Corp.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Novo Resources Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Victoria Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Novo Resources Corp. is 6.56x versus 0.06x for Victoria Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NSRPFNovo Resources Corp.6.56x -- -- -$3.3M VITFFVictoria Gold Corp.0.06x 2.02x $61.5M -$6.7M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
50
TGL alert for Dec 8
Treasure Global, Inc. [TGL] is up 33.49% over the past day.
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 42.66% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 10.18% over the past day.
