NGTF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a net margin of -472.39% compared to NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 2.69%. NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -87.41% beat Luxfer Holdings Plc's return on equity of 7.15%.

NightFood Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Luxfer Holdings Plc has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.84%. Given that Luxfer Holdings Plc has higher upside potential than NightFood Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Luxfer Holdings Plc is more attractive than NightFood Holdings, Inc..

NightFood Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 182.133% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luxfer Holdings Plc has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.34000000000001%.

NightFood Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Luxfer Holdings Plc offers a yield of 3.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. NightFood Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings Plc pays out 75.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NightFood Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $782K, which are smaller than Luxfer Holdings Plc quarterly revenues of $92.9M. NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3.7M is lower than Luxfer Holdings Plc's net income of $2.5M. Notably, NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Luxfer Holdings Plc's PE ratio is 29.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NightFood Holdings, Inc. is 3.69x versus 1.06x for Luxfer Holdings Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -472.39% compared to NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 1.23%. NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -87.41% beat Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 7.37%.

NightFood Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $37.00 which suggests that it could grow by 32.14%. Given that Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than NightFood Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is more attractive than NightFood Holdings, Inc..

NightFood Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 182.133% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.158, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.798%.

NightFood Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. NightFood Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. pays out 15.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NightFood Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $782K, which are smaller than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $398.6M. NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3.7M is lower than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net income of $4.9M. Notably, NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is 13.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NightFood Holdings, Inc. is 3.69x versus 0.25x for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quality Industrial Corp. has a net margin of -472.39% compared to NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -2.22%. NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -87.41% beat Quality Industrial Corp.'s return on equity of -79.19%.

NightFood Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Quality Industrial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NightFood Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Quality Industrial Corp., analysts believe NightFood Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Quality Industrial Corp..

NightFood Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 182.133% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quality Industrial Corp. has a beta of -5.276, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 627.59%.

NightFood Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quality Industrial Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NightFood Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quality Industrial Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NightFood Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $782K, which are smaller than Quality Industrial Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.5M. NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3.7M is lower than Quality Industrial Corp.'s net income of -$78.2K. Notably, NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quality Industrial Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NightFood Holdings, Inc. is 3.69x versus 0.11x for Quality Industrial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic, Inc. has a net margin of -472.39% compared to NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 2.12%. NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -87.41% beat Symbotic, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.95%.

NightFood Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Symbotic, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $62.86 which suggests that it could grow by 14.4%. Given that Symbotic, Inc. has higher upside potential than NightFood Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Symbotic, Inc. is more attractive than NightFood Holdings, Inc..

NightFood Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.821, which suggesting that the stock is 182.133% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NightFood Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Symbotic, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NightFood Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NightFood Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $782K, which are smaller than Symbotic, Inc. quarterly revenues of $630M. NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3.7M is lower than Symbotic, Inc.'s net income of $13.4M. Notably, NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Symbotic, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NightFood Holdings, Inc. is 3.69x versus 2.62x for Symbotic, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.