SYM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a net margin of -3.1% compared to Symbotic, Inc.'s net margin of 2.69%. Symbotic, Inc.'s return on equity of -21.35% beat Luxfer Holdings Plc's return on equity of 7.15%.

Symbotic, Inc. has a consensus price target of $61.67, signalling upside risk potential of 13.43%. On the other hand Luxfer Holdings Plc has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.29%. Given that Symbotic, Inc. has higher upside potential than Luxfer Holdings Plc, analysts believe Symbotic, Inc. is more attractive than Luxfer Holdings Plc.

Symbotic, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luxfer Holdings Plc has a beta of 0.996, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.414%.

Symbotic, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Luxfer Holdings Plc offers a yield of 3.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Symbotic, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings Plc pays out 75.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Symbotic, Inc. quarterly revenues are $618.5M, which are larger than Luxfer Holdings Plc quarterly revenues of $92.9M. Symbotic, Inc.'s net income of -$19.1M is lower than Luxfer Holdings Plc's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Symbotic, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Luxfer Holdings Plc's PE ratio is 28.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Symbotic, Inc. is 2.63x versus 1.03x for Luxfer Holdings Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NightFood Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -3.1% compared to Symbotic, Inc.'s net margin of -472.39%. Symbotic, Inc.'s return on equity of -21.35% beat NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -87.41%.

Symbotic, Inc. has a consensus price target of $61.67, signalling upside risk potential of 13.43%. On the other hand NightFood Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Symbotic, Inc. has higher upside potential than NightFood Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Symbotic, Inc. is more attractive than NightFood Holdings, Inc..

Symbotic, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NightFood Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.979, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 197.936%.

Symbotic, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NightFood Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Symbotic, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NightFood Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Symbotic, Inc. quarterly revenues are $618.5M, which are larger than NightFood Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $782K. Symbotic, Inc.'s net income of -$19.1M is lower than NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3.7M. Notably, Symbotic, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Symbotic, Inc. is 2.63x versus 4.43x for NightFood Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -3.1% compared to Symbotic, Inc.'s net margin of 1.23%. Symbotic, Inc.'s return on equity of -21.35% beat Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 7.37%.

Symbotic, Inc. has a consensus price target of $61.67, signalling upside risk potential of 13.43%. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -31.29%. Given that Symbotic, Inc. has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp., analysts believe Symbotic, Inc. is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp..

Symbotic, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.170, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.041%.

Symbotic, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Symbotic, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. pays out 15.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Symbotic, Inc. quarterly revenues are $618.5M, which are larger than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $398.6M. Symbotic, Inc.'s net income of -$19.1M is lower than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net income of $4.9M. Notably, Symbotic, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Symbotic, Inc. is 2.63x versus 0.20x for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quality Industrial Corp. has a net margin of -3.1% compared to Symbotic, Inc.'s net margin of -2.22%. Symbotic, Inc.'s return on equity of -21.35% beat Quality Industrial Corp.'s return on equity of -79.19%.

Symbotic, Inc. has a consensus price target of $61.67, signalling upside risk potential of 13.43%. On the other hand Quality Industrial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Symbotic, Inc. has higher upside potential than Quality Industrial Corp., analysts believe Symbotic, Inc. is more attractive than Quality Industrial Corp..

Symbotic, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quality Industrial Corp. has a beta of -5.275, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 627.514%.

Symbotic, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quality Industrial Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Symbotic, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quality Industrial Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Symbotic, Inc. quarterly revenues are $618.5M, which are larger than Quality Industrial Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.5M. Symbotic, Inc.'s net income of -$19.1M is lower than Quality Industrial Corp.'s net income of -$78.2K. Notably, Symbotic, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quality Industrial Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Symbotic, Inc. is 2.63x versus 0.11x for Quality Industrial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.