SYM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of -0.71% compared to Symbotic's net margin of 5.54%. Symbotic's return on equity of -2.31% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -19.72%.

Symbotic has a consensus price target of $35.51, signalling downside risk potential of -24.71%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Symbotic has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Symbotic is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.118, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.241%.

Symbotic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 1.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Symbotic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend.

Symbotic quarterly revenues are $549.7M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7.2M. Symbotic's net income of -$3.9M is lower than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of $401K. Notably, Symbotic's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Symbotic is 2.39x versus 0.45x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a net margin of -0.71% compared to Symbotic's net margin of 5.67%. Symbotic's return on equity of -2.31% beat Luxfer Holdings PLC's return on equity of 9.74%.

Symbotic has a consensus price target of $35.51, signalling downside risk potential of -24.71%. On the other hand Luxfer Holdings PLC has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 35.78%. Given that Luxfer Holdings PLC has higher upside potential than Symbotic, analysts believe Luxfer Holdings PLC is more attractive than Symbotic.

Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luxfer Holdings PLC has a beta of 1.100, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.024%.

Symbotic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Luxfer Holdings PLC offers a yield of 5.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Symbotic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings PLC pays out 76.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Symbotic quarterly revenues are $549.7M, which are larger than Luxfer Holdings PLC quarterly revenues of $97M. Symbotic's net income of -$3.9M is lower than Luxfer Holdings PLC's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Symbotic's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Luxfer Holdings PLC's PE ratio is 16.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Symbotic is 2.39x versus 0.85x for Luxfer Holdings PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a net margin of -0.71% compared to Symbotic's net margin of 2.05%. Symbotic's return on equity of -2.31% beat Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 9.33%.

Symbotic has a consensus price target of $35.51, signalling downside risk potential of -24.71%. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -17.07%. Given that Symbotic has more downside risk than Park-Ohio Holdings, analysts believe Park-Ohio Holdings is more attractive than Symbotic.

Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.246, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.648%.

Symbotic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park-Ohio Holdings offers a yield of 2.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Symbotic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings pays out 22.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Symbotic quarterly revenues are $549.7M, which are larger than Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues of $405.4M. Symbotic's net income of -$3.9M is lower than Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $8.3M. Notably, Symbotic's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Park-Ohio Holdings's PE ratio is 8.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Symbotic is 2.39x versus 0.15x for Park-Ohio Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quality Industrial has a net margin of -0.71% compared to Symbotic's net margin of --. Symbotic's return on equity of -2.31% beat Quality Industrial's return on equity of --.

Symbotic has a consensus price target of $35.51, signalling downside risk potential of -24.71%. On the other hand Quality Industrial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Symbotic has higher upside potential than Quality Industrial, analysts believe Symbotic is more attractive than Quality Industrial.

Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quality Industrial has a beta of -4.491, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 549.131%.

Symbotic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quality Industrial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Symbotic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quality Industrial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Symbotic quarterly revenues are $549.7M, which are larger than Quality Industrial quarterly revenues of --. Symbotic's net income of -$3.9M is higher than Quality Industrial's net income of --. Notably, Symbotic's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quality Industrial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Symbotic is 2.39x versus 0.01x for Quality Industrial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.