SYM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hillenbrand has a net margin of -0.71% compared to Symbotic's net margin of 0.91%. Symbotic's return on equity of -4.04% beat Hillenbrand's return on equity of -14.37%.

Symbotic has a consensus price target of $34.20, signalling upside risk potential of 95.4%. On the other hand Hillenbrand has an analysts' consensus of $40.00 which suggests that it could grow by 100.1%. Given that Hillenbrand has higher upside potential than Symbotic, analysts believe Hillenbrand is more attractive than Symbotic.

Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.489%.

Symbotic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hillenbrand offers a yield of 4.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Symbotic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hillenbrand pays out -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend.

Symbotic quarterly revenues are $486.7M, which are smaller than Hillenbrand quarterly revenues of $706.9M. Symbotic's net income of -$3.5M is lower than Hillenbrand's net income of $6.4M. Notably, Symbotic's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hillenbrand's PE ratio is 34.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Symbotic is 0.93x versus 0.45x for Hillenbrand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a net margin of -0.71% compared to Symbotic's net margin of 3.39%. Symbotic's return on equity of -4.04% beat Luxfer Holdings PLC's return on equity of 8.57%.

Symbotic has a consensus price target of $34.20, signalling upside risk potential of 95.4%. On the other hand Luxfer Holdings PLC has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 68.82%. Given that Symbotic has higher upside potential than Luxfer Holdings PLC, analysts believe Symbotic is more attractive than Luxfer Holdings PLC.

Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luxfer Holdings PLC has a beta of 0.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.94%.

Symbotic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Luxfer Holdings PLC offers a yield of 6.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Symbotic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings PLC pays out 76.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Symbotic quarterly revenues are $486.7M, which are larger than Luxfer Holdings PLC quarterly revenues of $103.4M. Symbotic's net income of -$3.5M is lower than Luxfer Holdings PLC's net income of $3.5M. Notably, Symbotic's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Luxfer Holdings PLC's PE ratio is 14.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Symbotic is 0.93x versus 0.70x for Luxfer Holdings PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a net margin of -0.71% compared to Symbotic's net margin of 0.13%. Symbotic's return on equity of -4.04% beat Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 10.13%.

Symbotic has a consensus price target of $34.20, signalling upside risk potential of 95.4%. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -20.02%. Given that Symbotic has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings, analysts believe Symbotic is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings.

Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.101, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.068%.

Symbotic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park-Ohio Holdings offers a yield of 2.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Symbotic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings pays out 22.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Symbotic quarterly revenues are $486.7M, which are larger than Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues of $388.4M. Symbotic's net income of -$3.5M is lower than Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $500K. Notably, Symbotic's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Park-Ohio Holdings's PE ratio is 7.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Symbotic is 0.93x versus 0.16x for Park-Ohio Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quality Industrial has a net margin of -0.71% compared to Symbotic's net margin of --. Symbotic's return on equity of -4.04% beat Quality Industrial's return on equity of --.

Symbotic has a consensus price target of $34.20, signalling upside risk potential of 95.4%. On the other hand Quality Industrial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Symbotic has higher upside potential than Quality Industrial, analysts believe Symbotic is more attractive than Quality Industrial.

Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quality Industrial has a beta of -4.080, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 507.955%.

Symbotic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quality Industrial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Symbotic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quality Industrial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Symbotic quarterly revenues are $486.7M, which are larger than Quality Industrial quarterly revenues of --. Symbotic's net income of -$3.5M is higher than Quality Industrial's net income of --. Notably, Symbotic's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quality Industrial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Symbotic is 0.93x versus 0.02x for Quality Industrial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.