CHMX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Next-ChemX's net margin of 12.78%. Next-ChemX's return on equity of -- beat Luxfer Holdings PLC's return on equity of 4.29%.

Next-ChemX has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Luxfer Holdings PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 28.98%. Given that Luxfer Holdings PLC has higher upside potential than Next-ChemX, analysts believe Luxfer Holdings PLC is more attractive than Next-ChemX.

Next-ChemX has a beta of -0.045, which suggesting that the stock is 104.52% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luxfer Holdings PLC has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.685%.

Next-ChemX has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Luxfer Holdings PLC offers a yield of 3.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Next-ChemX pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings PLC pays out -736.84% of its earnings as a dividend.

Next-ChemX quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Luxfer Holdings PLC quarterly revenues of $99.4M. Next-ChemX's net income of -$354.5K is lower than Luxfer Holdings PLC's net income of $12.7M. Notably, Next-ChemX's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Luxfer Holdings PLC's PE ratio is 38.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Next-ChemX is -- versus 0.92x for Luxfer Holdings PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Next-ChemX's net margin of 2.35%. Next-ChemX's return on equity of -- beat Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 5.53%.

Next-ChemX has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -40.48%. Given that Park-Ohio Holdings has higher upside potential than Next-ChemX, analysts believe Park-Ohio Holdings is more attractive than Next-ChemX.

Next-ChemX has a beta of -0.045, which suggesting that the stock is 104.52% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.184, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.382%.

Next-ChemX has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park-Ohio Holdings offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Next-ChemX pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings pays out 94.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Next-ChemX quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues of $417.6M. Next-ChemX's net income of -$354.5K is lower than Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $9.8M. Notably, Next-ChemX's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Park-Ohio Holdings's PE ratio is 20.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Next-ChemX is -- versus 0.20x for Park-Ohio Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quality Industrial has a net margin of -- compared to Next-ChemX's net margin of --. Next-ChemX's return on equity of -- beat Quality Industrial's return on equity of --.

Next-ChemX has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Quality Industrial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Next-ChemX has higher upside potential than Quality Industrial, analysts believe Next-ChemX is more attractive than Quality Industrial.

Next-ChemX has a beta of -0.045, which suggesting that the stock is 104.52% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quality Industrial has a beta of -3.479, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 447.915%.

Next-ChemX has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quality Industrial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Next-ChemX pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quality Industrial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Next-ChemX quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Quality Industrial quarterly revenues of --. Next-ChemX's net income of -$354.5K is higher than Quality Industrial's net income of --. Notably, Next-ChemX's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quality Industrial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Next-ChemX is -- versus 0.08x for Quality Industrial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic has a net margin of -- compared to Next-ChemX's net margin of 0.5%. Next-ChemX's return on equity of -- beat Symbotic's return on equity of -4.99%.

Next-ChemX has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Symbotic has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 47.01%. Given that Symbotic has higher upside potential than Next-ChemX, analysts believe Symbotic is more attractive than Next-ChemX.

Next-ChemX has a beta of -0.045, which suggesting that the stock is 104.52% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Next-ChemX has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Symbotic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Next-ChemX pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Next-ChemX quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Symbotic quarterly revenues of $564.6M. Next-ChemX's net income of -$354.5K is lower than Symbotic's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Next-ChemX's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Symbotic's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Next-ChemX is -- versus 1.28x for Symbotic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.