LXFR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hillenbrand has a net margin of 12.78% compared to Luxfer Holdings PLC's net margin of 1.74%. Luxfer Holdings PLC's return on equity of 4.29% beat Hillenbrand's return on equity of -13.25%.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 28.98%. On the other hand Hillenbrand has an analysts' consensus of $63.00 which suggests that it could grow by 46.21%. Given that Hillenbrand has higher upside potential than Luxfer Holdings PLC, analysts believe Hillenbrand is more attractive than Luxfer Holdings PLC.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a beta of 0.873, which suggesting that the stock is 12.685% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hillenbrand has a beta of 1.428, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.771%.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.95%. Hillenbrand offers a yield of 2.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Luxfer Holdings PLC pays -736.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Hillenbrand pays out -29.62% of its earnings as a dividend.

Luxfer Holdings PLC quarterly revenues are $99.4M, which are smaller than Hillenbrand quarterly revenues of $837.6M. Luxfer Holdings PLC's net income of $12.7M is lower than Hillenbrand's net income of $14.6M. Notably, Luxfer Holdings PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.76x while Hillenbrand's PE ratio is 39.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luxfer Holdings PLC is 0.92x versus 0.66x for Hillenbrand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a net margin of 12.78% compared to Luxfer Holdings PLC's net margin of 2.35%. Luxfer Holdings PLC's return on equity of 4.29% beat Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 5.53%.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 28.98%. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -40.48%. Given that Luxfer Holdings PLC has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings, analysts believe Luxfer Holdings PLC is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a beta of 0.873, which suggesting that the stock is 12.685% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.184, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.382%.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.95%. Park-Ohio Holdings offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Luxfer Holdings PLC pays -736.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings pays out 94.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Luxfer Holdings PLC quarterly revenues are $99.4M, which are smaller than Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues of $417.6M. Luxfer Holdings PLC's net income of $12.7M is higher than Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $9.8M. Notably, Luxfer Holdings PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.76x while Park-Ohio Holdings's PE ratio is 20.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luxfer Holdings PLC is 0.92x versus 0.20x for Park-Ohio Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quality Industrial has a net margin of 12.78% compared to Luxfer Holdings PLC's net margin of --. Luxfer Holdings PLC's return on equity of 4.29% beat Quality Industrial's return on equity of --.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 28.98%. On the other hand Quality Industrial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Luxfer Holdings PLC has higher upside potential than Quality Industrial, analysts believe Luxfer Holdings PLC is more attractive than Quality Industrial.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a beta of 0.873, which suggesting that the stock is 12.685% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quality Industrial has a beta of -3.479, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 447.915%.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.95%. Quality Industrial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luxfer Holdings PLC pays -736.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Quality Industrial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Luxfer Holdings PLC quarterly revenues are $99.4M, which are larger than Quality Industrial quarterly revenues of --. Luxfer Holdings PLC's net income of $12.7M is higher than Quality Industrial's net income of --. Notably, Luxfer Holdings PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.76x while Quality Industrial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luxfer Holdings PLC is 0.92x versus 0.08x for Quality Industrial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic has a net margin of 12.78% compared to Luxfer Holdings PLC's net margin of 0.5%. Luxfer Holdings PLC's return on equity of 4.29% beat Symbotic's return on equity of -4.99%.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 28.98%. On the other hand Symbotic has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 47.01%. Given that Symbotic has higher upside potential than Luxfer Holdings PLC, analysts believe Symbotic is more attractive than Luxfer Holdings PLC.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a beta of 0.873, which suggesting that the stock is 12.685% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.95%. Symbotic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luxfer Holdings PLC pays -736.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Luxfer Holdings PLC quarterly revenues are $99.4M, which are smaller than Symbotic quarterly revenues of $564.6M. Luxfer Holdings PLC's net income of $12.7M is higher than Symbotic's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Luxfer Holdings PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.76x while Symbotic's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luxfer Holdings PLC is 0.92x versus 1.28x for Symbotic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.