LXFR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NightFood Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 0.11% compared to Luxfer Holdings Plc's net margin of -193.9%. Luxfer Holdings Plc's return on equity of 5.74% beat NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -48.08%.

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 27.34%. On the other hand NightFood Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Luxfer Holdings Plc has higher upside potential than NightFood Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Luxfer Holdings Plc is more attractive than NightFood Holdings, Inc..

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a beta of 1.003, which suggesting that the stock is 0.34000000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NightFood Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.821, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 182.133%.

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.9%. NightFood Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luxfer Holdings Plc pays 184.01% of its earnings as a dividend. NightFood Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Luxfer Holdings Plc quarterly revenues are $90.7M, which are larger than NightFood Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Luxfer Holdings Plc's net income of $100K is higher than NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Luxfer Holdings Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.36x while NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luxfer Holdings Plc is 0.94x versus 1.82x for NightFood Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a net margin of 0.11% compared to Luxfer Holdings Plc's net margin of 1.23%. Luxfer Holdings Plc's return on equity of 5.74% beat Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 7.37%.

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 27.34%. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $37.00 which suggests that it could grow by 38.06%. Given that Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Luxfer Holdings Plc, analysts believe Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Luxfer Holdings Plc.

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a beta of 1.003, which suggesting that the stock is 0.34000000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.158, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.798%.

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.9%. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Luxfer Holdings Plc pays 184.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. pays out 15.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Luxfer Holdings Plc's is not.

Luxfer Holdings Plc quarterly revenues are $90.7M, which are smaller than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $398.6M. Luxfer Holdings Plc's net income of $100K is lower than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net income of $4.9M. Notably, Luxfer Holdings Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.36x while Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luxfer Holdings Plc is 0.94x versus 0.23x for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quality Industrial Corp. has a net margin of 0.11% compared to Luxfer Holdings Plc's net margin of -2.22%. Luxfer Holdings Plc's return on equity of 5.74% beat Quality Industrial Corp.'s return on equity of -79.19%.

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 27.34%. On the other hand Quality Industrial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Luxfer Holdings Plc has higher upside potential than Quality Industrial Corp., analysts believe Luxfer Holdings Plc is more attractive than Quality Industrial Corp..

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a beta of 1.003, which suggesting that the stock is 0.34000000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quality Industrial Corp. has a beta of -5.276, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 627.59%.

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.9%. Quality Industrial Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luxfer Holdings Plc pays 184.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Quality Industrial Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Luxfer Holdings Plc quarterly revenues are $90.7M, which are larger than Quality Industrial Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.5M. Luxfer Holdings Plc's net income of $100K is higher than Quality Industrial Corp.'s net income of -$78.2K. Notably, Luxfer Holdings Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.36x while Quality Industrial Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luxfer Holdings Plc is 0.94x versus 0.09x for Quality Industrial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic, Inc. has a net margin of 0.11% compared to Luxfer Holdings Plc's net margin of 2.12%. Luxfer Holdings Plc's return on equity of 5.74% beat Symbotic, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.95%.

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 27.34%. On the other hand Symbotic, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $63.93 which suggests that it could grow by 11.33%. Given that Luxfer Holdings Plc has higher upside potential than Symbotic, Inc., analysts believe Luxfer Holdings Plc is more attractive than Symbotic, Inc..

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a beta of 1.003, which suggesting that the stock is 0.34000000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.9%. Symbotic, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luxfer Holdings Plc pays 184.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Luxfer Holdings Plc quarterly revenues are $90.7M, which are smaller than Symbotic, Inc. quarterly revenues of $630M. Luxfer Holdings Plc's net income of $100K is lower than Symbotic, Inc.'s net income of $13.4M. Notably, Luxfer Holdings Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.36x while Symbotic, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luxfer Holdings Plc is 0.94x versus 2.74x for Symbotic, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.