LXFR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NightFood Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 2.69% compared to Luxfer Holdings Plc's net margin of -472.39%. Luxfer Holdings Plc's return on equity of 7.15% beat NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -87.41%.

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 21.43%. On the other hand NightFood Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Luxfer Holdings Plc has higher upside potential than NightFood Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Luxfer Holdings Plc is more attractive than NightFood Holdings, Inc..

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a beta of 1.019, which suggesting that the stock is 1.939% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NightFood Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -1.116, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 211.643%.

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. NightFood Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luxfer Holdings Plc pays 75.76% of its earnings as a dividend. NightFood Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Luxfer Holdings Plc quarterly revenues are $92.9M, which are larger than NightFood Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $782K. Luxfer Holdings Plc's net income of $2.5M is higher than NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3.7M. Notably, Luxfer Holdings Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.48x while NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luxfer Holdings Plc is 0.95x versus 6.12x for NightFood Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a net margin of 2.69% compared to Luxfer Holdings Plc's net margin of 1.23%. Luxfer Holdings Plc's return on equity of 7.15% beat Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 7.37%.

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 21.43%. On the other hand Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -26.89%. Given that Luxfer Holdings Plc has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp., analysts believe Luxfer Holdings Plc is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp..

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a beta of 1.019, which suggesting that the stock is 1.939% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.184, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.351%.

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Luxfer Holdings Plc pays 75.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. pays out 15.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Luxfer Holdings Plc quarterly revenues are $92.9M, which are smaller than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $398.6M. Luxfer Holdings Plc's net income of $2.5M is lower than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net income of $4.9M. Notably, Luxfer Holdings Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.48x while Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luxfer Holdings Plc is 0.95x versus 0.19x for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quality Industrial Corp. has a net margin of 2.69% compared to Luxfer Holdings Plc's net margin of -2.22%. Luxfer Holdings Plc's return on equity of 7.15% beat Quality Industrial Corp.'s return on equity of -79.19%.

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 21.43%. On the other hand Quality Industrial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Luxfer Holdings Plc has higher upside potential than Quality Industrial Corp., analysts believe Luxfer Holdings Plc is more attractive than Quality Industrial Corp..

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a beta of 1.019, which suggesting that the stock is 1.939% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quality Industrial Corp. has a beta of -5.302, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 630.204%.

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. Quality Industrial Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luxfer Holdings Plc pays 75.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Quality Industrial Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Luxfer Holdings Plc quarterly revenues are $92.9M, which are larger than Quality Industrial Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.5M. Luxfer Holdings Plc's net income of $2.5M is higher than Quality Industrial Corp.'s net income of -$78.2K. Notably, Luxfer Holdings Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.48x while Quality Industrial Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luxfer Holdings Plc is 0.95x versus 0.19x for Quality Industrial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic, Inc. has a net margin of 2.69% compared to Luxfer Holdings Plc's net margin of -3.1%. Luxfer Holdings Plc's return on equity of 7.15% beat Symbotic, Inc.'s return on equity of -21.35%.

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 21.43%. On the other hand Symbotic, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $61.42 which suggests that it could grow by 5.37%. Given that Luxfer Holdings Plc has higher upside potential than Symbotic, Inc., analysts believe Luxfer Holdings Plc is more attractive than Symbotic, Inc..

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a beta of 1.019, which suggesting that the stock is 1.939% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. Symbotic, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luxfer Holdings Plc pays 75.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Luxfer Holdings Plc quarterly revenues are $92.9M, which are smaller than Symbotic, Inc. quarterly revenues of $618.5M. Luxfer Holdings Plc's net income of $2.5M is higher than Symbotic, Inc.'s net income of -$19.1M. Notably, Luxfer Holdings Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.48x while Symbotic, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luxfer Holdings Plc is 0.95x versus 2.82x for Symbotic, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.