PKOH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a net margin of 1.23% compared to Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 0.11%. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 7.37% beat Luxfer Holdings Plc's return on equity of 5.74%.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $37.00, signalling upside risk potential of 38.06%. On the other hand Luxfer Holdings Plc has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 27.34%. Given that Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Luxfer Holdings Plc, analysts believe Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Luxfer Holdings Plc.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.798% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luxfer Holdings Plc has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.34000000000001%.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. Luxfer Holdings Plc offers a yield of 3.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. pays 15.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings Plc pays out 184.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Luxfer Holdings Plc's is not.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $398.6M, which are larger than Luxfer Holdings Plc quarterly revenues of $90.7M. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net income of $4.9M is higher than Luxfer Holdings Plc's net income of $100K. Notably, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.94x while Luxfer Holdings Plc's PE ratio is 47.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is 0.23x versus 0.94x for Luxfer Holdings Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NightFood Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 1.23% compared to Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net margin of -193.9%. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 7.37% beat NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -48.08%.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $37.00, signalling upside risk potential of 38.06%. On the other hand NightFood Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than NightFood Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is more attractive than NightFood Holdings, Inc..

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.798% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NightFood Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.821, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 182.133%.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. NightFood Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. pays 15.69% of its earnings as a dividend. NightFood Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $398.6M, which are larger than NightFood Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net income of $4.9M is higher than NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.94x while NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is 0.23x versus 1.82x for NightFood Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quality Industrial Corp. has a net margin of 1.23% compared to Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net margin of -2.22%. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 7.37% beat Quality Industrial Corp.'s return on equity of -79.19%.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $37.00, signalling upside risk potential of 38.06%. On the other hand Quality Industrial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Quality Industrial Corp., analysts believe Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Quality Industrial Corp..

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.798% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quality Industrial Corp. has a beta of -5.276, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 627.59%.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. Quality Industrial Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. pays 15.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Quality Industrial Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $398.6M, which are larger than Quality Industrial Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.5M. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net income of $4.9M is higher than Quality Industrial Corp.'s net income of -$78.2K. Notably, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.94x while Quality Industrial Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is 0.23x versus 0.09x for Quality Industrial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic, Inc. has a net margin of 1.23% compared to Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 2.12%. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 7.37% beat Symbotic, Inc.'s return on equity of -10.95%.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $37.00, signalling upside risk potential of 38.06%. On the other hand Symbotic, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $63.93 which suggests that it could grow by 11.33%. Given that Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Symbotic, Inc., analysts believe Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Symbotic, Inc..

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.798% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. Symbotic, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. pays 15.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $398.6M, which are smaller than Symbotic, Inc. quarterly revenues of $630M. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net income of $4.9M is lower than Symbotic, Inc.'s net income of $13.4M. Notably, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.94x while Symbotic, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is 0.23x versus 2.74x for Symbotic, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.