PKOH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Luxfer Holdings Plc has a net margin of 1.23% compared to Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 2.69%. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 7.37% beat Luxfer Holdings Plc's return on equity of 7.15%.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -30.82%. On the other hand Luxfer Holdings Plc has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.8%. Given that Luxfer Holdings Plc has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp., analysts believe Luxfer Holdings Plc is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp..

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.170, which suggesting that the stock is 17.041% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luxfer Holdings Plc has a beta of 0.996, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.414%.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Luxfer Holdings Plc offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. pays 15.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings Plc pays out 75.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $398.6M, which are larger than Luxfer Holdings Plc quarterly revenues of $92.9M. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net income of $4.9M is higher than Luxfer Holdings Plc's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.82x while Luxfer Holdings Plc's PE ratio is 27.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is 0.20x versus 0.97x for Luxfer Holdings Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NightFood Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 1.23% compared to Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net margin of -472.39%. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 7.37% beat NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -87.41%.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -30.82%. On the other hand NightFood Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than NightFood Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is more attractive than NightFood Holdings, Inc..

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.170, which suggesting that the stock is 17.041% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NightFood Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.979, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 197.936%.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. NightFood Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. pays 15.69% of its earnings as a dividend. NightFood Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $398.6M, which are larger than NightFood Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $782K. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net income of $4.9M is higher than NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3.7M. Notably, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.82x while NightFood Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is 0.20x versus 5.90x for NightFood Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quality Industrial Corp. has a net margin of 1.23% compared to Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net margin of -2.22%. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 7.37% beat Quality Industrial Corp.'s return on equity of -79.19%.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -30.82%. On the other hand Quality Industrial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Quality Industrial Corp., analysts believe Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Quality Industrial Corp..

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.170, which suggesting that the stock is 17.041% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quality Industrial Corp. has a beta of -5.275, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 627.514%.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Quality Industrial Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. pays 15.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Quality Industrial Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $398.6M, which are larger than Quality Industrial Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.5M. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net income of $4.9M is higher than Quality Industrial Corp.'s net income of -$78.2K. Notably, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.82x while Quality Industrial Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is 0.20x versus 0.20x for Quality Industrial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic, Inc. has a net margin of 1.23% compared to Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net margin of -3.1%. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 7.37% beat Symbotic, Inc.'s return on equity of -21.35%.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -30.82%. On the other hand Symbotic, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $61.42 which suggests that it could fall by -13.01%. Given that Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has more downside risk than Symbotic, Inc., analysts believe Symbotic, Inc. is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings Corp..

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.170, which suggesting that the stock is 17.041% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Symbotic, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. pays 15.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $398.6M, which are smaller than Symbotic, Inc. quarterly revenues of $618.5M. Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s net income of $4.9M is higher than Symbotic, Inc.'s net income of -$19.1M. Notably, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.82x while Symbotic, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is 0.20x versus 3.42x for Symbotic, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.