PKOH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of 0.13% compared to Park-Ohio Holdings's net margin of -20.76%. Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 10.13% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -20.47%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Park-Ohio Holdings has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Park-Ohio Holdings is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.068% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.163, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.682%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.57%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Park-Ohio Holdings pays 22.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues are $388.4M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7M. Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $500K is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Park-Ohio Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.92x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park-Ohio Holdings is 0.16x versus 0.35x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a net margin of 0.13% compared to Park-Ohio Holdings's net margin of 3.39%. Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 10.13% beat Luxfer Holdings PLC's return on equity of 8.57%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -20.47%. On the other hand Luxfer Holdings PLC has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 67.82%. Given that Luxfer Holdings PLC has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings, analysts believe Luxfer Holdings PLC is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.068% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luxfer Holdings PLC has a beta of 0.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.94%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.57%. Luxfer Holdings PLC offers a yield of 6.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Park-Ohio Holdings pays 22.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings PLC pays out 76.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues are $388.4M, which are larger than Luxfer Holdings PLC quarterly revenues of $103.4M. Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $500K is lower than Luxfer Holdings PLC's net income of $3.5M. Notably, Park-Ohio Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.92x while Luxfer Holdings PLC's PE ratio is 14.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park-Ohio Holdings is 0.16x versus 0.70x for Luxfer Holdings PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quality Industrial has a net margin of 0.13% compared to Park-Ohio Holdings's net margin of --. Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 10.13% beat Quality Industrial's return on equity of --.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -20.47%. On the other hand Quality Industrial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Park-Ohio Holdings has higher upside potential than Quality Industrial, analysts believe Park-Ohio Holdings is more attractive than Quality Industrial.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.068% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quality Industrial has a beta of -4.080, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 507.955%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.57%. Quality Industrial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park-Ohio Holdings pays 22.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Quality Industrial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues are $388.4M, which are larger than Quality Industrial quarterly revenues of --. Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $500K is higher than Quality Industrial's net income of --. Notably, Park-Ohio Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.92x while Quality Industrial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park-Ohio Holdings is 0.16x versus 0.03x for Quality Industrial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symbotic has a net margin of 0.13% compared to Park-Ohio Holdings's net margin of -0.71%. Park-Ohio Holdings's return on equity of 10.13% beat Symbotic's return on equity of -4.04%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -20.47%. On the other hand Symbotic has an analysts' consensus of $33.76 which suggests that it could grow by 63.63%. Given that Symbotic has higher upside potential than Park-Ohio Holdings, analysts believe Symbotic is more attractive than Park-Ohio Holdings.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.068% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symbotic has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Park-Ohio Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.57%. Symbotic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park-Ohio Holdings pays 22.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Symbotic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park-Ohio Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park-Ohio Holdings quarterly revenues are $388.4M, which are smaller than Symbotic quarterly revenues of $486.7M. Park-Ohio Holdings's net income of $500K is higher than Symbotic's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Park-Ohio Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.92x while Symbotic's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park-Ohio Holdings is 0.16x versus 1.09x for Symbotic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.