Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Buy
90
AWAEF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.14
Seasonality move
:
2.34%
Day range:
$0.14 - $0.14
52-week range:
$0.07 - $0.14
Dividend yield:
5.87%
P/E ratio:
2.59x
P/S ratio:
0.34x
P/B ratio:
0.25x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
36.05%
Market cap:
$360.6M
Revenue:
$1.1B
EPS (TTM):
$0.03
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AWAEF
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CEG
Constellation Energy Corp.
|
$6.6B | $3.12 | 0.62% | -17.95% | $399.93 |
|
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ELLO
Ellomay Capital Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GLVNF
Gallant Venture Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KEN
Kenon Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AWAEF
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.14 | -- | $360.6M | 2.59x | $0.01 | 5.87% | 0.34x |
|
CEG
Constellation Energy Corp.
|
$359.82 | $399.93 | $112.4B | 41.21x | $0.39 | 0.43% | 4.21x |
|
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group Ltd.
|
$0.04 | -- | $326.1M | 4.10x | $0.00 | 10.79% | 1.00x |
|
ELLO
Ellomay Capital Ltd.
|
$21.58 | -- | $297.4M | 57.90x | $0.00 | 0% | 6.17x |
|
GLVNF
Gallant Venture Ltd.
|
$0.07 | -- | $382.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.62x |
|
KEN
Kenon Holdings Ltd.
|
$61.35 | -- | $3.2B | 6.78x | $4.80 | 7.82% | 4.01x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AWAEF
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
|
67.75% | 0.996 | 302.6% | 1.11x |
|
CEG
Constellation Energy Corp.
|
38.64% | 4.051 | 8.76% | 1.00x |
|
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group Ltd.
|
69.51% | -2.260 | -- | 0.99x |
|
ELLO
Ellomay Capital Ltd.
|
79.41% | 0.746 | 302.91% | 0.85x |
|
GLVNF
Gallant Venture Ltd.
|
42.98% | 0.000 | -- | 0.94x |
|
KEN
Kenon Holdings Ltd.
|
47.88% | 0.477 | 36.22% | 4.54x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AWAEF
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
|
$87.4M | $49.3M | 1.63% | 3.84% | 17.48% | -$42.5M |
|
CEG
Constellation Energy Corp.
|
$1.7B | $1.5B | 12.3% | 20.06% | 21.42% | $1.5B |
|
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.19% | 6.64% | -- | -- |
|
ELLO
Ellomay Capital Ltd.
|
$3.6M | $621.4K | -0.65% | -2.88% | 91.25% | -$28.9M |
|
GLVNF
Gallant Venture Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -0.65% | -1.1% | -- | -- |
|
KEN
Kenon Holdings Ltd.
|
$68M | $24M | -0.46% | -0.7% | 9.06% | $65M |
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AWAEF or CEG?
Constellation Energy Corp. has a net margin of 4.54% compared to SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 12.93%. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.84% beat Constellation Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 20.06%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AWAEFSIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.27.08% $0.01 $5.3B CEGConstellation Energy Corp.23.72% $2.97 $23.7B -
What do Analysts Say About AWAEF or CEG?
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Constellation Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $399.93 which suggests that it could grow by 11.15%. Given that Constellation Energy Corp. has higher upside potential than SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Constellation Energy Corp. is more attractive than SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AWAEFSIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 CEGConstellation Energy Corp.9 5 0 -
Is AWAEF or CEG More Risky?
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.321, which suggesting that the stock is 67.934% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellation Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AWAEF or CEG?
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. Constellation Energy Corp. offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. pays 25.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Energy Corp. pays out 11.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AWAEF or CEG?
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $322.9M, which are smaller than Constellation Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $7.2B. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $14.7M is lower than Constellation Energy Corp.'s net income of $929M. Notably, SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.59x while Constellation Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 41.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. is 0.34x versus 4.21x for Constellation Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AWAEFSIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.0.34x 2.59x $322.9M $14.7M CEGConstellation Energy Corp.4.21x 41.21x $7.2B $929M
-
Which has Higher Returns AWAEF or CWPWF?
Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has a net margin of 4.54% compared to SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.84% beat Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AWAEFSIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.27.08% $0.01 $5.3B CWPWFConcord New Energy Group Ltd.-- -- $4B -
What do Analysts Say About AWAEF or CWPWF?
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Concord New Energy Group Ltd., analysts believe SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Concord New Energy Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AWAEFSIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 CWPWFConcord New Energy Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is AWAEF or CWPWF More Risky?
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.321, which suggesting that the stock is 67.934% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.031, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.132%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AWAEF or CWPWF?
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. Concord New Energy Group Ltd. offers a yield of 10.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. pays 25.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Concord New Energy Group Ltd. pays out 32.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AWAEF or CWPWF?
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $322.9M, which are larger than Concord New Energy Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $14.7M is higher than Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.59x while Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. is 0.34x versus 1.00x for Concord New Energy Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AWAEFSIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.0.34x 2.59x $322.9M $14.7M CWPWFConcord New Energy Group Ltd.1.00x 4.10x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AWAEF or ELLO?
Ellomay Capital Ltd. has a net margin of 4.54% compared to SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 49.49%. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.84% beat Ellomay Capital Ltd.'s return on equity of -2.88%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AWAEFSIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.27.08% $0.01 $5.3B ELLOEllomay Capital Ltd.26.27% $0.52 $656.7M -
What do Analysts Say About AWAEF or ELLO?
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ellomay Capital Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -47.64%. Given that Ellomay Capital Ltd. has higher upside potential than SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Ellomay Capital Ltd. is more attractive than SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AWAEFSIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 ELLOEllomay Capital Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is AWAEF or ELLO More Risky?
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.321, which suggesting that the stock is 67.934% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ellomay Capital Ltd. has a beta of 1.028, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.774%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AWAEF or ELLO?
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. Ellomay Capital Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. pays 25.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Ellomay Capital Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AWAEF or ELLO?
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $322.9M, which are larger than Ellomay Capital Ltd. quarterly revenues of $13.6M. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $14.7M is higher than Ellomay Capital Ltd.'s net income of $6.7M. Notably, SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.59x while Ellomay Capital Ltd.'s PE ratio is 57.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. is 0.34x versus 6.17x for Ellomay Capital Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AWAEFSIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.0.34x 2.59x $322.9M $14.7M ELLOEllomay Capital Ltd.6.17x 57.90x $13.6M $6.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns AWAEF or GLVNF?
Gallant Venture Ltd. has a net margin of 4.54% compared to SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.84% beat Gallant Venture Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.1%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AWAEFSIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.27.08% $0.01 $5.3B GLVNFGallant Venture Ltd.-- -- $906.3M -
What do Analysts Say About AWAEF or GLVNF?
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gallant Venture Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Gallant Venture Ltd., analysts believe SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Gallant Venture Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AWAEFSIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 GLVNFGallant Venture Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is AWAEF or GLVNF More Risky?
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.321, which suggesting that the stock is 67.934% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gallant Venture Ltd. has a beta of 0.359, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.068%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AWAEF or GLVNF?
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. Gallant Venture Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. pays 25.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Gallant Venture Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AWAEF or GLVNF?
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $322.9M, which are larger than Gallant Venture Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $14.7M is higher than Gallant Venture Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.59x while Gallant Venture Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. is 0.34x versus 2.62x for Gallant Venture Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AWAEFSIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.0.34x 2.59x $322.9M $14.7M GLVNFGallant Venture Ltd.2.62x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AWAEF or KEN?
Kenon Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 4.54% compared to SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 25.28%. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.84% beat Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AWAEFSIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.27.08% $0.01 $5.3B KENKenon Holdings Ltd.25.66% $0.48 $4.3B -
What do Analysts Say About AWAEF or KEN?
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kenon Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -78.81%. Given that Kenon Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Kenon Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AWAEFSIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 KENKenon Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is AWAEF or KEN More Risky?
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.321, which suggesting that the stock is 67.934% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kenon Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.197%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AWAEF or KEN?
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. Kenon Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 7.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.80 per share. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. pays 25.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Kenon Holdings Ltd. pays out 33.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AWAEF or KEN?
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $322.9M, which are larger than Kenon Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $265M. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $14.7M is lower than Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $67M. Notably, SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.59x while Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 6.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. is 0.34x versus 4.01x for Kenon Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AWAEFSIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.0.34x 2.59x $322.9M $14.7M KENKenon Holdings Ltd.4.01x 6.78x $265M $67M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
50
TGL alert for Dec 8
Treasure Global, Inc. [TGL] is up 21.86% over the past day.
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 39.76% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 7.15% over the past day.
