Financhill
Buy
86

AWAEF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$0.12
Seasonality move :
4.92%
Day range:
$0.12 - $0.12
52-week range:
$0.07 - $0.14
Dividend yield:
7.08%
P/E ratio:
2.59x
P/S ratio:
0.29x
P/B ratio:
0.21x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
63.39%
Market cap:
$307.6M
Revenue:
$1.1B
EPS (TTM):
$0.03

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
AWAEF
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
GLVNF
Gallant Venture Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
KEN
Kenon Holdings Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
$8.1B $1.93 22.72% -10.95% $202.85
PAM
Pampa Energía SA
$464.3M $1.33 11.03% -10.98% $108.78
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
AWAEF
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
$0.12 -- $307.6M 2.59x $0.01 7.08% 0.29x
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group Ltd.
$0.04 -- $312.1M 4.10x $0.00 11.16% 0.95x
GLVNF
Gallant Venture Ltd.
$0.07 -- $382.4M -- $0.00 0% 2.62x
KEN
Kenon Holdings Ltd.
$80.87 -- $4.2B 8.94x $4.80 5.94% 5.28x
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
$179.18 $202.85 $38.7B 26.19x $0.48 1% 1.19x
PAM
Pampa Energía SA
$83.04 $108.78 $4.5B 13.03x $0.00 0% 2.32x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
AWAEF
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
67.75% 1.647 302.6% 1.11x
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group Ltd.
69.51% -1.965 -- 0.99x
GLVNF
Gallant Venture Ltd.
42.98% 0.000 -- 0.94x
KEN
Kenon Holdings Ltd.
47.88% 0.943 36.22% 4.54x
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
86.01% 2.653 38.1% 0.54x
PAM
Pampa Energía SA
34.35% 0.636 55.14% 1.78x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
AWAEF
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
$87.4M $49.3M 1.63% 3.84% 17.48% -$42.5M
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group Ltd.
-- -- 2.19% 6.64% -- --
GLVNF
Gallant Venture Ltd.
-- -- -0.65% -1.1% -- --
KEN
Kenon Holdings Ltd.
$68M $24M -0.46% -0.7% 9.06% $65M
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
$568M -$44M 10.58% 59.88% -0.58% $231M
PAM
Pampa Energía SA
$245.8M $150.7M 6.69% 10.22% 25.16% $112.6M

SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns AWAEF or CWPWF?

    Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has a net margin of 4.54% compared to SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.84% beat Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.64%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AWAEF
    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
    27.08% $0.01 $5.3B
    CWPWF
    Concord New Energy Group Ltd.
    -- -- $4B
  • What do Analysts Say About AWAEF or CWPWF?

    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Concord New Energy Group Ltd., analysts believe SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Concord New Energy Group Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AWAEF
    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
    0 0 0
    CWPWF
    Concord New Energy Group Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is AWAEF or CWPWF More Risky?

    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.342, which suggesting that the stock is 65.8% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.006, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.444%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AWAEF or CWPWF?

    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.08%. Concord New Energy Group Ltd. offers a yield of 11.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. pays 25.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Concord New Energy Group Ltd. pays out 32.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AWAEF or CWPWF?

    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $322.9M, which are larger than Concord New Energy Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $14.7M is higher than Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.59x while Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. is 0.29x versus 0.95x for Concord New Energy Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AWAEF
    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
    0.29x 2.59x $322.9M $14.7M
    CWPWF
    Concord New Energy Group Ltd.
    0.95x 4.10x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns AWAEF or GLVNF?

    Gallant Venture Ltd. has a net margin of 4.54% compared to SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.84% beat Gallant Venture Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.1%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AWAEF
    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
    27.08% $0.01 $5.3B
    GLVNF
    Gallant Venture Ltd.
    -- -- $906.3M
  • What do Analysts Say About AWAEF or GLVNF?

    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gallant Venture Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Gallant Venture Ltd., analysts believe SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Gallant Venture Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AWAEF
    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
    0 0 0
    GLVNF
    Gallant Venture Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is AWAEF or GLVNF More Risky?

    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.342, which suggesting that the stock is 65.8% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gallant Venture Ltd. has a beta of 0.363, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.726%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AWAEF or GLVNF?

    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.08%. Gallant Venture Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. pays 25.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Gallant Venture Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AWAEF or GLVNF?

    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $322.9M, which are larger than Gallant Venture Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $14.7M is higher than Gallant Venture Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.59x while Gallant Venture Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. is 0.29x versus 2.62x for Gallant Venture Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AWAEF
    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
    0.29x 2.59x $322.9M $14.7M
    GLVNF
    Gallant Venture Ltd.
    2.62x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns AWAEF or KEN?

    Kenon Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 4.54% compared to SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 25.28%. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.84% beat Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.7%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AWAEF
    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
    27.08% $0.01 $5.3B
    KEN
    Kenon Holdings Ltd.
    25.66% $0.48 $4.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About AWAEF or KEN?

    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kenon Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -83.93%. Given that Kenon Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Kenon Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AWAEF
    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
    0 0 0
    KEN
    Kenon Holdings Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is AWAEF or KEN More Risky?

    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.342, which suggesting that the stock is 65.8% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kenon Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 1.005, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.46299999999999%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AWAEF or KEN?

    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.08%. Kenon Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 5.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.80 per share. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. pays 25.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Kenon Holdings Ltd. pays out 33.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AWAEF or KEN?

    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $322.9M, which are larger than Kenon Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $265M. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $14.7M is lower than Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $67M. Notably, SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.59x while Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. is 0.29x versus 5.28x for Kenon Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AWAEF
    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
    0.29x 2.59x $322.9M $14.7M
    KEN
    Kenon Holdings Ltd.
    5.28x 8.94x $265M $67M
  • Which has Higher Returns AWAEF or NRG?

    NRG Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 4.54% compared to SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 2.01%. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.84% beat NRG Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 59.88%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AWAEF
    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
    27.08% $0.01 $5.3B
    NRG
    NRG Energy, Inc.
    7.49% $0.69 $14.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About AWAEF or NRG?

    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NRG Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $202.85 which suggests that it could grow by 13.21%. Given that NRG Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd., analysts believe NRG Energy, Inc. is more attractive than SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AWAEF
    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
    0 0 0
    NRG
    NRG Energy, Inc.
    8 3 1
  • Is AWAEF or NRG More Risky?

    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.342, which suggesting that the stock is 65.8% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NRG Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.272, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.222%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AWAEF or NRG?

    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.08%. NRG Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. pays 25.23% of its earnings as a dividend. NRG Energy, Inc. pays out 32.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AWAEF or NRG?

    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $322.9M, which are smaller than NRG Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.6B. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $14.7M is lower than NRG Energy, Inc.'s net income of $152M. Notably, SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.59x while NRG Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. is 0.29x versus 1.19x for NRG Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AWAEF
    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
    0.29x 2.59x $322.9M $14.7M
    NRG
    NRG Energy, Inc.
    1.19x 26.19x $7.6B $152M
  • Which has Higher Returns AWAEF or PAM?

    Pampa Energía SA has a net margin of 4.54% compared to SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 5.06%. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.84% beat Pampa Energía SA's return on equity of 10.22%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AWAEF
    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
    27.08% $0.01 $5.3B
    PAM
    Pampa Energía SA
    41.05% $0.56 $5.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About AWAEF or PAM?

    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pampa Energía SA has an analysts' consensus of $108.78 which suggests that it could grow by 30.99%. Given that Pampa Energía SA has higher upside potential than SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Pampa Energía SA is more attractive than SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AWAEF
    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
    0 0 0
    PAM
    Pampa Energía SA
    5 3 0
  • Is AWAEF or PAM More Risky?

    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.342, which suggesting that the stock is 65.8% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pampa Energía SA has a beta of 1.142, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.177%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AWAEF or PAM?

    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.08%. Pampa Energía SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. pays 25.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Pampa Energía SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AWAEF or PAM?

    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $322.9M, which are smaller than Pampa Energía SA quarterly revenues of $598.7M. SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $14.7M is lower than Pampa Energía SA's net income of $30.3M. Notably, SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.59x while Pampa Energía SA's PE ratio is 13.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd. is 0.29x versus 2.32x for Pampa Energía SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AWAEF
    SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
    0.29x 2.59x $322.9M $14.7M
    PAM
    Pampa Energía SA
    2.32x 13.03x $598.7M $30.3M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?

Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…

Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?

Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…

Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?

Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…

Stock Ideas

Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x

Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x

Alerts

Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 21

RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is up 34.37% over the past day.

Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 21

JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 24.98% over the past day.

Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 21

Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is up 23.81% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock