AWAEF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ellomay Capital has a net margin of 9.14% compared to SIIC Environment Holdings's net margin of 49.49%. SIIC Environment Holdings's return on equity of 3.34% beat Ellomay Capital's return on equity of -2.88%.

SIIC Environment Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ellomay Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -31.72%. Given that Ellomay Capital has higher upside potential than SIIC Environment Holdings, analysts believe Ellomay Capital is more attractive than SIIC Environment Holdings.

SIIC Environment Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ellomay Capital has a beta of 1.198, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.809%.

SIIC Environment Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.14%. Ellomay Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SIIC Environment Holdings pays 33.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Ellomay Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIIC Environment Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SIIC Environment Holdings quarterly revenues are $272.2M, which are larger than Ellomay Capital quarterly revenues of $13.6M. SIIC Environment Holdings's net income of $24.9M is higher than Ellomay Capital's net income of $6.7M. Notably, SIIC Environment Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.60x while Ellomay Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SIIC Environment Holdings is 0.21x versus 4.88x for Ellomay Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gallant Venture has a net margin of 9.14% compared to SIIC Environment Holdings's net margin of --. SIIC Environment Holdings's return on equity of 3.34% beat Gallant Venture's return on equity of -5.96%.

SIIC Environment Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gallant Venture has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SIIC Environment Holdings has higher upside potential than Gallant Venture, analysts believe SIIC Environment Holdings is more attractive than Gallant Venture.

SIIC Environment Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gallant Venture has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SIIC Environment Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.14%. Gallant Venture offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SIIC Environment Holdings pays 33.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Gallant Venture pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIIC Environment Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SIIC Environment Holdings quarterly revenues are $272.2M, which are larger than Gallant Venture quarterly revenues of --. SIIC Environment Holdings's net income of $24.9M is higher than Gallant Venture's net income of --. Notably, SIIC Environment Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.60x while Gallant Venture's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SIIC Environment Holdings is 0.21x versus 2.75x for Gallant Venture. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kenon Holdings has a net margin of 9.14% compared to SIIC Environment Holdings's net margin of 18.14%. SIIC Environment Holdings's return on equity of 3.34% beat Kenon Holdings's return on equity of 8.41%.

SIIC Environment Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kenon Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -58.57%. Given that Kenon Holdings has higher upside potential than SIIC Environment Holdings, analysts believe Kenon Holdings is more attractive than SIIC Environment Holdings.

SIIC Environment Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kenon Holdings has a beta of 1.309, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.948%.

SIIC Environment Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.14%. Kenon Holdings offers a yield of 12.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.80 per share. SIIC Environment Holdings pays 33.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Kenon Holdings pays out -63.72% of its earnings as a dividend. SIIC Environment Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SIIC Environment Holdings quarterly revenues are $272.2M, which are larger than Kenon Holdings quarterly revenues of $237M. SIIC Environment Holdings's net income of $24.9M is lower than Kenon Holdings's net income of $43M. Notably, SIIC Environment Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.60x while Kenon Holdings's PE ratio is 9.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SIIC Environment Holdings is 0.21x versus 2.23x for Kenon Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talen Energy has a net margin of 9.14% compared to SIIC Environment Holdings's net margin of 30.27%. SIIC Environment Holdings's return on equity of 3.34% beat Talen Energy's return on equity of --.

SIIC Environment Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $253.74 which suggests that it could grow by 19.29%. Given that Talen Energy has higher upside potential than SIIC Environment Holdings, analysts believe Talen Energy is more attractive than SIIC Environment Holdings.

SIIC Environment Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SIIC Environment Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.14%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SIIC Environment Holdings pays 33.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIIC Environment Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SIIC Environment Holdings quarterly revenues are $272.2M, which are smaller than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $555M. SIIC Environment Holdings's net income of $24.9M is lower than Talen Energy's net income of $168M. Notably, SIIC Environment Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.60x while Talen Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SIIC Environment Holdings is 0.21x versus -- for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.