CWPWF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Centrica Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.64% beat Centrica Plc's return on equity of -5.51%.

Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Centrica Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Centrica Plc, analysts believe Concord New Energy Group Ltd. is more attractive than Centrica Plc.

Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.044, which suggesting that the stock is 95.625% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Centrica Plc has a beta of 0.678, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.181%.

Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.16%. Centrica Plc offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Concord New Energy Group Ltd. pays 15.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Centrica Plc pays out 16.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Concord New Energy Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Centrica Plc quarterly revenues of --. Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Centrica Plc's net income of --. Notably, Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.39x while Centrica Plc's PE ratio is 18.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Concord New Energy Group Ltd. is 0.90x versus 0.56x for Centrica Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gallant Venture Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.64% beat Gallant Venture Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.1%.

Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gallant Venture Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Gallant Venture Ltd., analysts believe Concord New Energy Group Ltd. is more attractive than Gallant Venture Ltd..

Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.044, which suggesting that the stock is 95.625% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gallant Venture Ltd. has a beta of 0.374, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.597%.

Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.16%. Gallant Venture Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Concord New Energy Group Ltd. pays 15.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Gallant Venture Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Concord New Energy Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gallant Venture Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Gallant Venture Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.39x while Gallant Venture Ltd.'s PE ratio is 58.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Concord New Energy Group Ltd. is 0.90x versus 2.37x for Gallant Venture Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kenon Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s net margin of 25.28%. Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.64% beat Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.7%.

Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kenon Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -84.79%. Given that Kenon Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Concord New Energy Group Ltd., analysts believe Kenon Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Concord New Energy Group Ltd..

Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.044, which suggesting that the stock is 95.625% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kenon Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.940, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.995%.

Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.16%. Kenon Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 5.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.80 per share. Concord New Energy Group Ltd. pays 15.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Kenon Holdings Ltd. pays out 33.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Concord New Energy Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kenon Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $265M. Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $67M. Notably, Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.39x while Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 66.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Concord New Energy Group Ltd. is 0.90x versus 5.13x for Kenon Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NRG Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s net margin of 0.85%. Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.64% beat NRG Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.59%.

Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NRG Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $201.94 which suggests that it could grow by 32.26%. Given that NRG Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Concord New Energy Group Ltd., analysts believe NRG Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Concord New Energy Group Ltd..

Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.044, which suggesting that the stock is 95.625% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NRG Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.352, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.174%.

Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.16%. NRG Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Concord New Energy Group Ltd. pays 15.39% of its earnings as a dividend. NRG Energy, Inc. pays out 43.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Concord New Energy Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NRG Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than NRG Energy, Inc.'s net income of $66M. Notably, Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.39x while NRG Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 39.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Concord New Energy Group Ltd. is 0.90x versus 0.99x for NRG Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.