GLVNF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Smart Powerr has a net margin of -- compared to Gallant Venture's net margin of --. Gallant Venture's return on equity of -5.96% beat Smart Powerr's return on equity of --.

Gallant Venture has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Smart Powerr has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4781.45%. Given that Smart Powerr has higher upside potential than Gallant Venture, analysts believe Smart Powerr is more attractive than Gallant Venture.

Gallant Venture has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smart Powerr has a beta of 0.648, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.182%.

Gallant Venture has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Smart Powerr offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gallant Venture pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Smart Powerr pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gallant Venture quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Smart Powerr quarterly revenues of --. Gallant Venture's net income of -- is lower than Smart Powerr's net income of -$262.7K. Notably, Gallant Venture's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Smart Powerr's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gallant Venture is 2.75x versus -- for Smart Powerr. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ellomay Capital has a net margin of -- compared to Gallant Venture's net margin of 49.49%. Gallant Venture's return on equity of -5.96% beat Ellomay Capital's return on equity of -2.88%.

Gallant Venture has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ellomay Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -31.68%. Given that Ellomay Capital has higher upside potential than Gallant Venture, analysts believe Ellomay Capital is more attractive than Gallant Venture.

Gallant Venture has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ellomay Capital has a beta of 1.198, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.809%.

Gallant Venture has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ellomay Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gallant Venture pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ellomay Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gallant Venture quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ellomay Capital quarterly revenues of $13.6M. Gallant Venture's net income of -- is lower than Ellomay Capital's net income of $6.7M. Notably, Gallant Venture's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ellomay Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gallant Venture is 2.75x versus 4.87x for Ellomay Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kenon Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Gallant Venture's net margin of 18.14%. Gallant Venture's return on equity of -5.96% beat Kenon Holdings's return on equity of 8.41%.

Gallant Venture has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kenon Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -58.98%. Given that Kenon Holdings has higher upside potential than Gallant Venture, analysts believe Kenon Holdings is more attractive than Gallant Venture.

Gallant Venture has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kenon Holdings has a beta of 1.309, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.948%.

Gallant Venture has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kenon Holdings offers a yield of 11.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.80 per share. Gallant Venture pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kenon Holdings pays out -63.72% of its earnings as a dividend.

Gallant Venture quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kenon Holdings quarterly revenues of $237M. Gallant Venture's net income of -- is lower than Kenon Holdings's net income of $43M. Notably, Gallant Venture's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kenon Holdings's PE ratio is 9.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gallant Venture is 2.75x versus 2.26x for Kenon Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talen Energy has a net margin of -- compared to Gallant Venture's net margin of 30.27%. Gallant Venture's return on equity of -5.96% beat Talen Energy's return on equity of --.

Gallant Venture has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $253.74 which suggests that it could grow by 16.29%. Given that Talen Energy has higher upside potential than Gallant Venture, analysts believe Talen Energy is more attractive than Gallant Venture.

Gallant Venture has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Gallant Venture has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gallant Venture pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gallant Venture quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $555M. Gallant Venture's net income of -- is lower than Talen Energy's net income of $168M. Notably, Gallant Venture's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Talen Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gallant Venture is 2.75x versus -- for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.