GLVNF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Constellation Energy Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Gallant Venture Ltd.'s net margin of 12.93%. Gallant Venture Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.1% beat Constellation Energy Corp.'s return on equity of 20.06%.

Gallant Venture Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Constellation Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $399.93 which suggests that it could grow by 11.15%. Given that Constellation Energy Corp. has higher upside potential than Gallant Venture Ltd., analysts believe Constellation Energy Corp. is more attractive than Gallant Venture Ltd..

Gallant Venture Ltd. has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.068% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellation Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Gallant Venture Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Constellation Energy Corp. offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Gallant Venture Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Energy Corp. pays out 11.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Energy Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gallant Venture Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Constellation Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Gallant Venture Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Constellation Energy Corp.'s net income of $929M. Notably, Gallant Venture Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Constellation Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is 41.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gallant Venture Ltd. is 2.62x versus 4.21x for Constellation Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Gallant Venture Ltd.'s net margin of --. Gallant Venture Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.1% beat Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.64%.

Gallant Venture Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gallant Venture Ltd. has higher upside potential than Concord New Energy Group Ltd., analysts believe Gallant Venture Ltd. is more attractive than Concord New Energy Group Ltd..

Gallant Venture Ltd. has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.068% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.031, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.132%.

Gallant Venture Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Concord New Energy Group Ltd. offers a yield of 10.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gallant Venture Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Concord New Energy Group Ltd. pays out 32.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gallant Venture Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Concord New Energy Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Gallant Venture Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Gallant Venture Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gallant Venture Ltd. is 2.62x versus 1.00x for Concord New Energy Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ellomay Capital Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Gallant Venture Ltd.'s net margin of 49.49%. Gallant Venture Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.1% beat Ellomay Capital Ltd.'s return on equity of -2.88%.

Gallant Venture Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ellomay Capital Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -47.64%. Given that Ellomay Capital Ltd. has higher upside potential than Gallant Venture Ltd., analysts believe Ellomay Capital Ltd. is more attractive than Gallant Venture Ltd..

Gallant Venture Ltd. has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.068% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ellomay Capital Ltd. has a beta of 1.028, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.774%.

Gallant Venture Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ellomay Capital Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gallant Venture Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ellomay Capital Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gallant Venture Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ellomay Capital Ltd. quarterly revenues of $13.6M. Gallant Venture Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Ellomay Capital Ltd.'s net income of $6.7M. Notably, Gallant Venture Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ellomay Capital Ltd.'s PE ratio is 57.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gallant Venture Ltd. is 2.62x versus 6.17x for Ellomay Capital Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kenon Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Gallant Venture Ltd.'s net margin of 25.28%. Gallant Venture Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.1% beat Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.7%.

Gallant Venture Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kenon Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -78.81%. Given that Kenon Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Gallant Venture Ltd., analysts believe Kenon Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Gallant Venture Ltd..

Gallant Venture Ltd. has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.068% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kenon Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.197%.

Gallant Venture Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kenon Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 7.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.80 per share. Gallant Venture Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kenon Holdings Ltd. pays out 33.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gallant Venture Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kenon Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $265M. Gallant Venture Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $67M. Notably, Gallant Venture Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 6.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gallant Venture Ltd. is 2.62x versus 4.01x for Kenon Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.