KEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Centrica Plc has a net margin of 25.28% compared to Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.7% beat Centrica Plc's return on equity of -5.51%.

Kenon Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -84.79%. On the other hand Centrica Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kenon Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Centrica Plc, analysts believe Kenon Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Centrica Plc.

Kenon Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 5.995% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Centrica Plc has a beta of 0.678, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.181%.

Kenon Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $4.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.66%. Centrica Plc offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Kenon Holdings Ltd. pays 33.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Centrica Plc pays out 16.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kenon Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $265M, which are larger than Centrica Plc quarterly revenues of --. Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $67M is higher than Centrica Plc's net income of --. Notably, Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 66.44x while Centrica Plc's PE ratio is 18.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kenon Holdings Ltd. is 5.13x versus 0.56x for Centrica Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has a net margin of 25.28% compared to Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.7% beat Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.64%.

Kenon Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -84.79%. On the other hand Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kenon Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Concord New Energy Group Ltd., analysts believe Kenon Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Concord New Energy Group Ltd..

Kenon Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 5.995% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Concord New Energy Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.044, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.625%.

Kenon Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $4.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.66%. Concord New Energy Group Ltd. offers a yield of 11.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kenon Holdings Ltd. pays 33.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Concord New Energy Group Ltd. pays out 15.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kenon Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $265M, which are larger than Concord New Energy Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $67M is higher than Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 66.44x while Concord New Energy Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 17.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kenon Holdings Ltd. is 5.13x versus 0.90x for Concord New Energy Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gallant Venture Ltd. has a net margin of 25.28% compared to Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.7% beat Gallant Venture Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.1%.

Kenon Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -84.79%. On the other hand Gallant Venture Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kenon Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Gallant Venture Ltd., analysts believe Kenon Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Gallant Venture Ltd..

Kenon Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 5.995% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gallant Venture Ltd. has a beta of 0.374, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.597%.

Kenon Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $4.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.66%. Gallant Venture Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kenon Holdings Ltd. pays 33.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Gallant Venture Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kenon Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $265M, which are larger than Gallant Venture Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $67M is higher than Gallant Venture Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 66.44x while Gallant Venture Ltd.'s PE ratio is 58.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kenon Holdings Ltd. is 5.13x versus 2.37x for Gallant Venture Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NRG Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 25.28% compared to Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 0.85%. Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.7% beat NRG Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.59%.

Kenon Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -84.79%. On the other hand NRG Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $201.94 which suggests that it could grow by 32.26%. Given that NRG Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kenon Holdings Ltd., analysts believe NRG Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Kenon Holdings Ltd..

Kenon Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 5.995% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NRG Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.352, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.174%.

Kenon Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $4.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.66%. NRG Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Kenon Holdings Ltd. pays 33.52% of its earnings as a dividend. NRG Energy, Inc. pays out 43.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kenon Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are $265M, which are smaller than NRG Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $67M is higher than NRG Energy, Inc.'s net income of $66M. Notably, Kenon Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 66.44x while NRG Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 39.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kenon Holdings Ltd. is 5.13x versus 0.99x for NRG Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.