KEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ellomay Capital has a net margin of 18.14% compared to Kenon Holdings's net margin of 49.49%. Kenon Holdings's return on equity of 8.41% beat Ellomay Capital's return on equity of -2.88%.

Kenon Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -58.57%. On the other hand Ellomay Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -31.72%. Given that Kenon Holdings has more downside risk than Ellomay Capital, analysts believe Ellomay Capital is more attractive than Kenon Holdings.

Kenon Holdings has a beta of 1.309, which suggesting that the stock is 30.948% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ellomay Capital has a beta of 1.198, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.809%.

Kenon Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $3.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.11%. Ellomay Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kenon Holdings pays -63.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Ellomay Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kenon Holdings quarterly revenues are $237M, which are larger than Ellomay Capital quarterly revenues of $13.6M. Kenon Holdings's net income of $43M is higher than Ellomay Capital's net income of $6.7M. Notably, Kenon Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.81x while Ellomay Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kenon Holdings is 2.23x versus 4.88x for Ellomay Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Vernova has a net margin of 18.14% compared to Kenon Holdings's net margin of -1.79%. Kenon Holdings's return on equity of 8.41% beat GE Vernova's return on equity of --.

Kenon Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -58.57%. On the other hand GE Vernova has an analysts' consensus of $366.50 which suggests that it could fall by -0.55%. Given that Kenon Holdings has more downside risk than GE Vernova, analysts believe GE Vernova is more attractive than Kenon Holdings.

Kenon Holdings has a beta of 1.309, which suggesting that the stock is 30.948% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Vernova has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kenon Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $3.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.11%. GE Vernova offers a yield of 0.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Kenon Holdings pays -63.72% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Vernova pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kenon Holdings quarterly revenues are $237M, which are smaller than GE Vernova quarterly revenues of $7.3B. Kenon Holdings's net income of $43M is higher than GE Vernova's net income of -$130M. Notably, Kenon Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.81x while GE Vernova's PE ratio is 88.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kenon Holdings is 2.23x versus 2.95x for GE Vernova. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gallant Venture has a net margin of 18.14% compared to Kenon Holdings's net margin of --. Kenon Holdings's return on equity of 8.41% beat Gallant Venture's return on equity of -5.96%.

Kenon Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -58.57%. On the other hand Gallant Venture has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kenon Holdings has higher upside potential than Gallant Venture, analysts believe Kenon Holdings is more attractive than Gallant Venture.

Kenon Holdings has a beta of 1.309, which suggesting that the stock is 30.948% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gallant Venture has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kenon Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $3.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.11%. Gallant Venture offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kenon Holdings pays -63.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Gallant Venture pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kenon Holdings quarterly revenues are $237M, which are larger than Gallant Venture quarterly revenues of --. Kenon Holdings's net income of $43M is higher than Gallant Venture's net income of --. Notably, Kenon Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.81x while Gallant Venture's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kenon Holdings is 2.23x versus 2.75x for Gallant Venture. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ormat Technologies has a net margin of 18.14% compared to Kenon Holdings's net margin of 10.43%. Kenon Holdings's return on equity of 8.41% beat Ormat Technologies's return on equity of 4.79%.

Kenon Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -58.57%. On the other hand Ormat Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.75%. Given that Ormat Technologies has higher upside potential than Kenon Holdings, analysts believe Ormat Technologies is more attractive than Kenon Holdings.

Kenon Holdings has a beta of 1.309, which suggesting that the stock is 30.948% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ormat Technologies has a beta of 0.571, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.89%.

Kenon Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $3.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.11%. Ormat Technologies offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Kenon Holdings pays -63.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Ormat Technologies pays out 22.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Ormat Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kenon Holdings quarterly revenues are $237M, which are larger than Ormat Technologies quarterly revenues of $211.8M. Kenon Holdings's net income of $43M is higher than Ormat Technologies's net income of $22.1M. Notably, Kenon Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.81x while Ormat Technologies's PE ratio is 35.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kenon Holdings is 2.23x versus 4.76x for Ormat Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.