Financhill
Buy
53

PAM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$85.80
Seasonality move :
5.65%
Day range:
$82.26 - $86.96
52-week range:
$38.15 - $93.11
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
21.91x
P/S ratio:
1.14x
P/B ratio:
1.46x
Volume:
219.8K
Avg. volume:
338K
1-year change:
71.57%
Market cap:
$4.7B
Revenue:
$5.3B
EPS (TTM):
$3.92

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
PAM
Pampa Energia SA
$560.9M $1.83 -81.78% -39.65% $47.63
AES
The AES
$3.5B $0.64 1.63% 99.78% $18.56
CEPU
Central Puerto SA
$162.5M -- -71.7% -- --
EDCFF
Enel Generacion Costanera SA
-- -- -- -- --
EDN
Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA
$512.2M -$0.01 -62.64% -99.12% $53.50
TRSNF
Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
PAM
Pampa Energia SA
$85.92 $47.63 $4.7B 21.91x $0.00 0% 1.14x
AES
The AES
$13.00 $18.56 $9.2B 9.03x $0.17 5.31% 0.75x
CEPU
Central Puerto SA
$13.67 -- $2.1B 5.07x $0.40 6.62% 17.16x
EDCFF
Enel Generacion Costanera SA
$0.22 -- $154.4M -- $0.02 0% 11.88x
EDN
Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA
$42.27 $53.50 $1.9B 1.40x $0.00 0% 7.83x
TRSNF
Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA
$1.24 -- $549.2M -- $0.00 0% 15.34x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
PAM
Pampa Energia SA
35.12% 0.218 52.98% 1.99x
AES
The AES
89.95% 0.371 158.24% 0.31x
CEPU
Central Puerto SA
17.94% -1.028 26.84% 1.87x
EDCFF
Enel Generacion Costanera SA
24.33% 0.000 26.87% 1.75x
EDN
Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA
22.58% 0.482 34.87% 0.68x
TRSNF
Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA
-- 0.000 -- 1.60x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
PAM
Pampa Energia SA
$176.9M $111M 18.67% 29.14% 36.83% $108.9M
AES
The AES
$722M $665M 2.94% 15.92% 21.53% -$847M
CEPU
Central Puerto SA
$77M $80.6M 18.55% 23.29% 56.25% $91.1M
EDCFF
Enel Generacion Costanera SA
$1.6M $1M -46.52% -61.11% 19.77% $11.8M
EDN
Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA
$108.4M $7.1M -4.91% -6.05% 39.61% -$45.6M
TRSNF
Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA
$36.6M $30.4M -7.3% -7.3% 34.83% $28.4M

Pampa Energia SA vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns PAM or AES?

    The AES has a net margin of 27.31% compared to Pampa Energia SA's net margin of 15.26%. Pampa Energia SA's return on equity of 29.14% beat The AES's return on equity of 15.92%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PAM
    Pampa Energia SA
    32.59% $2.73 $4.9B
    AES
    The AES
    21.95% $0.71 $37.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About PAM or AES?

    Pampa Energia SA has a consensus price target of $47.63, signalling upside risk potential of 5.33%. On the other hand The AES has an analysts' consensus of $18.56 which suggests that it could grow by 42.79%. Given that The AES has higher upside potential than Pampa Energia SA, analysts believe The AES is more attractive than Pampa Energia SA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PAM
    Pampa Energia SA
    3 4 1
    AES
    The AES
    7 3 0
  • Is PAM or AES More Risky?

    Pampa Energia SA has a beta of 0.962, which suggesting that the stock is 3.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The AES has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.335%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PAM or AES?

    Pampa Energia SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The AES offers a yield of 5.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Pampa Energia SA pays 0.33% of its earnings as a dividend. The AES pays out 178.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Pampa Energia SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The AES's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PAM or AES?

    Pampa Energia SA quarterly revenues are $543M, which are smaller than The AES quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Pampa Energia SA's net income of $148.3M is lower than The AES's net income of $502M. Notably, Pampa Energia SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.91x while The AES's PE ratio is 9.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pampa Energia SA is 1.14x versus 0.75x for The AES. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PAM
    Pampa Energia SA
    1.14x 21.91x $543M $148.3M
    AES
    The AES
    0.75x 9.03x $3.3B $502M
  • Which has Higher Returns PAM or CEPU?

    Central Puerto SA has a net margin of 27.31% compared to Pampa Energia SA's net margin of 21.21%. Pampa Energia SA's return on equity of 29.14% beat Central Puerto SA's return on equity of 23.29%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PAM
    Pampa Energia SA
    32.59% $2.73 $4.9B
    CEPU
    Central Puerto SA
    40.25% $0.27 $2.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About PAM or CEPU?

    Pampa Energia SA has a consensus price target of $47.63, signalling upside risk potential of 5.33%. On the other hand Central Puerto SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 17.05%. Given that Central Puerto SA has higher upside potential than Pampa Energia SA, analysts believe Central Puerto SA is more attractive than Pampa Energia SA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PAM
    Pampa Energia SA
    3 4 1
    CEPU
    Central Puerto SA
    0 0 0
  • Is PAM or CEPU More Risky?

    Pampa Energia SA has a beta of 0.962, which suggesting that the stock is 3.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Central Puerto SA has a beta of 1.297, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.708%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PAM or CEPU?

    Pampa Energia SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Central Puerto SA offers a yield of 6.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Pampa Energia SA pays 0.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Central Puerto SA pays out 14.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PAM or CEPU?

    Pampa Energia SA quarterly revenues are $543M, which are larger than Central Puerto SA quarterly revenues of $191.2M. Pampa Energia SA's net income of $148.3M is higher than Central Puerto SA's net income of $40.5M. Notably, Pampa Energia SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.91x while Central Puerto SA's PE ratio is 5.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pampa Energia SA is 1.14x versus 17.16x for Central Puerto SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PAM
    Pampa Energia SA
    1.14x 21.91x $543M $148.3M
    CEPU
    Central Puerto SA
    17.16x 5.07x $191.2M $40.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns PAM or EDCFF?

    Enel Generacion Costanera SA has a net margin of 27.31% compared to Pampa Energia SA's net margin of -13.86%. Pampa Energia SA's return on equity of 29.14% beat Enel Generacion Costanera SA's return on equity of -61.11%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PAM
    Pampa Energia SA
    32.59% $2.73 $4.9B
    EDCFF
    Enel Generacion Costanera SA
    6.01% -$0.00 $155.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About PAM or EDCFF?

    Pampa Energia SA has a consensus price target of $47.63, signalling upside risk potential of 5.33%. On the other hand Enel Generacion Costanera SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pampa Energia SA has higher upside potential than Enel Generacion Costanera SA, analysts believe Pampa Energia SA is more attractive than Enel Generacion Costanera SA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PAM
    Pampa Energia SA
    3 4 1
    EDCFF
    Enel Generacion Costanera SA
    0 0 0
  • Is PAM or EDCFF More Risky?

    Pampa Energia SA has a beta of 0.962, which suggesting that the stock is 3.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enel Generacion Costanera SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PAM or EDCFF?

    Pampa Energia SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enel Generacion Costanera SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Pampa Energia SA pays 0.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Enel Generacion Costanera SA pays out -7.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Pampa Energia SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PAM or EDCFF?

    Pampa Energia SA quarterly revenues are $543M, which are larger than Enel Generacion Costanera SA quarterly revenues of $27M. Pampa Energia SA's net income of $148.3M is higher than Enel Generacion Costanera SA's net income of -$3.7M. Notably, Pampa Energia SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.91x while Enel Generacion Costanera SA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pampa Energia SA is 1.14x versus 11.88x for Enel Generacion Costanera SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PAM
    Pampa Energia SA
    1.14x 21.91x $543M $148.3M
    EDCFF
    Enel Generacion Costanera SA
    11.88x -- $27M -$3.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns PAM or EDN?

    Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA has a net margin of 27.31% compared to Pampa Energia SA's net margin of 20.59%. Pampa Energia SA's return on equity of 29.14% beat Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA's return on equity of -6.05%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PAM
    Pampa Energia SA
    32.59% $2.73 $4.9B
    EDN
    Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA
    18.35% $2.78 $1.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About PAM or EDN?

    Pampa Energia SA has a consensus price target of $47.63, signalling upside risk potential of 5.33%. On the other hand Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA has an analysts' consensus of $53.50 which suggests that it could grow by 26.57%. Given that Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA has higher upside potential than Pampa Energia SA, analysts believe Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA is more attractive than Pampa Energia SA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PAM
    Pampa Energia SA
    3 4 1
    EDN
    Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA
    1 0 0
  • Is PAM or EDN More Risky?

    Pampa Energia SA has a beta of 0.962, which suggesting that the stock is 3.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA has a beta of 1.451, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.149%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PAM or EDN?

    Pampa Energia SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pampa Energia SA pays 0.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pampa Energia SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PAM or EDN?

    Pampa Energia SA quarterly revenues are $543M, which are smaller than Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA quarterly revenues of $590.9M. Pampa Energia SA's net income of $148.3M is higher than Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA's net income of $121.7M. Notably, Pampa Energia SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.91x while Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA's PE ratio is 1.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pampa Energia SA is 1.14x versus 7.83x for Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PAM
    Pampa Energia SA
    1.14x 21.91x $543M $148.3M
    EDN
    Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA
    7.83x 1.40x $590.9M $121.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns PAM or TRSNF?

    Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA has a net margin of 27.31% compared to Pampa Energia SA's net margin of 22.34%. Pampa Energia SA's return on equity of 29.14% beat Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA's return on equity of -7.3%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PAM
    Pampa Energia SA
    32.59% $2.73 $4.9B
    TRSNF
    Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA
    43.63% $0.04 $574.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About PAM or TRSNF?

    Pampa Energia SA has a consensus price target of $47.63, signalling upside risk potential of 5.33%. On the other hand Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pampa Energia SA has higher upside potential than Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA, analysts believe Pampa Energia SA is more attractive than Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PAM
    Pampa Energia SA
    3 4 1
    TRSNF
    Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA
    0 0 0
  • Is PAM or TRSNF More Risky?

    Pampa Energia SA has a beta of 0.962, which suggesting that the stock is 3.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PAM or TRSNF?

    Pampa Energia SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pampa Energia SA pays 0.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pampa Energia SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PAM or TRSNF?

    Pampa Energia SA quarterly revenues are $543M, which are larger than Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA quarterly revenues of $83.9M. Pampa Energia SA's net income of $148.3M is higher than Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA's net income of $18.8M. Notably, Pampa Energia SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.91x while Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pampa Energia SA is 1.14x versus 15.34x for Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PAM
    Pampa Energia SA
    1.14x 21.91x $543M $148.3M
    TRSNF
    Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA
    15.34x -- $83.9M $18.8M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret

It’s not often that a company with the scale and…

Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?

Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…

Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?

Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…

Stock Ideas

Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x

Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21

Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.

Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21

Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.

Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21

Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock