PAM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Enel Generacion Costanera SA has a net margin of 24.37% compared to Pampa Energia SA's net margin of 36.92%. Pampa Energia SA's return on equity of 20.61% beat Enel Generacion Costanera SA's return on equity of 4.93%.

Pampa Energia SA has a consensus price target of $97.25, signalling upside risk potential of 34.4%. On the other hand Enel Generacion Costanera SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pampa Energia SA has higher upside potential than Enel Generacion Costanera SA, analysts believe Pampa Energia SA is more attractive than Enel Generacion Costanera SA.

Pampa Energia SA has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.322% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enel Generacion Costanera SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Pampa Energia SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enel Generacion Costanera SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Pampa Energia SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enel Generacion Costanera SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pampa Energia SA quarterly revenues are $435M, which are larger than Enel Generacion Costanera SA quarterly revenues of $31.8M. Pampa Energia SA's net income of $106M is higher than Enel Generacion Costanera SA's net income of $11.8M. Notably, Pampa Energia SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.15x while Enel Generacion Costanera SA's PE ratio is 42.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pampa Energia SA is 2.02x versus 2.48x for Enel Generacion Costanera SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA has a net margin of 24.37% compared to Pampa Energia SA's net margin of 5.88%. Pampa Energia SA's return on equity of 20.61% beat Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA's return on equity of 27.4%.

Pampa Energia SA has a consensus price target of $97.25, signalling upside risk potential of 34.4%. On the other hand Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA has an analysts' consensus of $48.50 which suggests that it could grow by 60.33%. Given that Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA has higher upside potential than Pampa Energia SA, analysts believe Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA is more attractive than Pampa Energia SA.

Pampa Energia SA has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.322% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA has a beta of 1.531, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.06%.

Pampa Energia SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pampa Energia SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pampa Energia SA quarterly revenues are $435M, which are smaller than Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA quarterly revenues of $630.6M. Pampa Energia SA's net income of $106M is higher than Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA's net income of $37.1M. Notably, Pampa Energia SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.15x while Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA's PE ratio is 4.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pampa Energia SA is 2.02x versus 0.65x for Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA has a net margin of 24.37% compared to Pampa Energia SA's net margin of 22.9%. Pampa Energia SA's return on equity of 20.61% beat Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA's return on equity of 12.35%.

Pampa Energia SA has a consensus price target of $97.25, signalling upside risk potential of 34.4%. On the other hand Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pampa Energia SA has higher upside potential than Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA, analysts believe Pampa Energia SA is more attractive than Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA.

Pampa Energia SA has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.322% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Pampa Energia SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pampa Energia SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pampa Energia SA quarterly revenues are $435M, which are larger than Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA quarterly revenues of $108.7M. Pampa Energia SA's net income of $106M is higher than Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA's net income of $24.9M. Notably, Pampa Energia SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.15x while Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA's PE ratio is 7.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pampa Energia SA is 2.02x versus 1.62x for Compania de Transporte de Energia Electrica en Alta Tension Transener SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Eco Wave Power Global AB has a net margin of 24.37% compared to Pampa Energia SA's net margin of -313.69%. Pampa Energia SA's return on equity of 20.61% beat Eco Wave Power Global AB's return on equity of -29.13%.

Pampa Energia SA has a consensus price target of $97.25, signalling upside risk potential of 34.4%. On the other hand Eco Wave Power Global AB has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 138.1%. Given that Eco Wave Power Global AB has higher upside potential than Pampa Energia SA, analysts believe Eco Wave Power Global AB is more attractive than Pampa Energia SA.

Pampa Energia SA has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.322% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eco Wave Power Global AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Pampa Energia SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Eco Wave Power Global AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pampa Energia SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eco Wave Power Global AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pampa Energia SA quarterly revenues are $435M, which are larger than Eco Wave Power Global AB quarterly revenues of $168K. Pampa Energia SA's net income of $106M is higher than Eco Wave Power Global AB's net income of -$527K. Notably, Pampa Energia SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.15x while Eco Wave Power Global AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pampa Energia SA is 2.02x versus -- for Eco Wave Power Global AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.