ARGTF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Royalty Corp. has a net margin of 35.98% compared to Artemis Gold, Inc.'s net margin of -27.31%. Artemis Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.7% beat Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15%.

Artemis Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gold Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.11 which suggests that it could grow by 27.36%. Given that Gold Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than Artemis Gold, Inc., analysts believe Gold Royalty Corp. is more attractive than Artemis Gold, Inc..

Artemis Gold, Inc. has a beta of 1.137, which suggesting that the stock is 13.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Artemis Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Artemis Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Artemis Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $223.7M, which are larger than Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. Artemis Gold, Inc.'s net income of $80.5M is higher than Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Artemis Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 43.13x while Gold Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Artemis Gold, Inc. is 15.14x versus 47.27x for Gold Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McEwen, Inc. has a net margin of 35.98% compared to Artemis Gold, Inc.'s net margin of -0.91%. Artemis Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.7% beat McEwen, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.43%.

Artemis Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand McEwen, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.60 which suggests that it could grow by 19.77%. Given that McEwen, Inc. has higher upside potential than Artemis Gold, Inc., analysts believe McEwen, Inc. is more attractive than Artemis Gold, Inc..

Artemis Gold, Inc. has a beta of 1.137, which suggesting that the stock is 13.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen, Inc. has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.347%.

Artemis Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McEwen, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Artemis Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Artemis Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $223.7M, which are larger than McEwen, Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.5M. Artemis Gold, Inc.'s net income of $80.5M is higher than McEwen, Inc.'s net income of -$462K. Notably, Artemis Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 43.13x while McEwen, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Artemis Gold, Inc. is 15.14x versus 6.08x for McEwen, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a net margin of 35.98% compared to Artemis Gold, Inc.'s net margin of --. Artemis Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.7% beat Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31%.

Artemis Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Seabridge Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $55.78 which suggests that it could grow by 96.08%. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Artemis Gold, Inc., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Artemis Gold, Inc..

Artemis Gold, Inc. has a beta of 1.137, which suggesting that the stock is 13.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.933%.

Artemis Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seabridge Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Artemis Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Artemis Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $223.7M, which are larger than Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Artemis Gold, Inc.'s net income of $80.5M is higher than Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M. Notably, Artemis Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 43.13x while Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Artemis Gold, Inc. is 15.14x versus -- for Seabridge Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Victoria Gold Corp. has a net margin of 35.98% compared to Artemis Gold, Inc.'s net margin of -10.81%. Artemis Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.7% beat Victoria Gold Corp.'s return on equity of 2.62%.

Artemis Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Victoria Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Artemis Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Victoria Gold Corp., analysts believe Artemis Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Victoria Gold Corp..

Artemis Gold, Inc. has a beta of 1.137, which suggesting that the stock is 13.707% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria Gold Corp. has a beta of 18.710, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1770.964%.

Artemis Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Victoria Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Artemis Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Artemis Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $223.7M, which are larger than Victoria Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of $61.5M. Artemis Gold, Inc.'s net income of $80.5M is higher than Victoria Gold Corp.'s net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Artemis Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 43.13x while Victoria Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 2.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Artemis Gold, Inc. is 15.14x versus 0.01x for Victoria Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.