ARGTF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gatos Silver has a net margin of -- compared to Artemis Gold's net margin of --. Artemis Gold's return on equity of -- beat Gatos Silver's return on equity of --.

Artemis Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gatos Silver has an analysts' consensus of $15.92 which suggests that it could grow by 10.37%. Given that Gatos Silver has higher upside potential than Artemis Gold, analysts believe Gatos Silver is more attractive than Artemis Gold.

Artemis Gold has a beta of 1.373, which suggesting that the stock is 37.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gatos Silver has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Artemis Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gatos Silver offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Artemis Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gatos Silver pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Artemis Gold quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gatos Silver quarterly revenues of --. Artemis Gold's net income of -$7.5M is lower than Gatos Silver's net income of $9.9M. Notably, Artemis Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gatos Silver's PE ratio is 30.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Artemis Gold is -- versus -- for Gatos Silver. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Royalty has a net margin of -- compared to Artemis Gold's net margin of -124.64%. Artemis Gold's return on equity of -- beat Gold Royalty's return on equity of -3.65%.

Artemis Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gold Royalty has an analysts' consensus of $3.39 which suggests that it could grow by 162.98%. Given that Gold Royalty has higher upside potential than Artemis Gold, analysts believe Gold Royalty is more attractive than Artemis Gold.

Artemis Gold has a beta of 1.373, which suggesting that the stock is 37.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Artemis Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Artemis Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty pays out -9.71% of its earnings as a dividend.

Artemis Gold quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Royalty quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Artemis Gold's net income of -$7.5M is lower than Gold Royalty's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Artemis Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Royalty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Artemis Gold is -- versus 24.16x for Gold Royalty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McEwen Mining has a net margin of -- compared to Artemis Gold's net margin of -3.98%. Artemis Gold's return on equity of -- beat McEwen Mining's return on equity of 21.4%.

Artemis Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand McEwen Mining has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 81.68%. Given that McEwen Mining has higher upside potential than Artemis Gold, analysts believe McEwen Mining is more attractive than Artemis Gold.

Artemis Gold has a beta of 1.373, which suggesting that the stock is 37.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen Mining has a beta of 1.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.879%.

Artemis Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McEwen Mining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Artemis Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen Mining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Artemis Gold quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than McEwen Mining quarterly revenues of $52.3M. Artemis Gold's net income of -$7.5M is lower than McEwen Mining's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Artemis Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while McEwen Mining's PE ratio is 3.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Artemis Gold is -- versus 2.01x for McEwen Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold has a net margin of -- compared to Artemis Gold's net margin of --. Artemis Gold's return on equity of -- beat Seabridge Gold's return on equity of --.

Artemis Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Seabridge Gold has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 248.49%. Given that Seabridge Gold has higher upside potential than Artemis Gold, analysts believe Seabridge Gold is more attractive than Artemis Gold.

Artemis Gold has a beta of 1.373, which suggesting that the stock is 37.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold has a beta of 1.067, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.701%.

Artemis Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seabridge Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Artemis Gold pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Artemis Gold quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Seabridge Gold quarterly revenues of --. Artemis Gold's net income of -$7.5M is higher than Seabridge Gold's net income of -$20.2M. Notably, Artemis Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seabridge Gold's PE ratio is 263.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Artemis Gold is -- versus -- for Seabridge Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.